Pharmaceutical Messianism and the Politics of Covid-19 in the United States

Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, public officials in the United States–from the President to governors, mayors, lawmakers, and even school district commissioners–touted unproven treatments for COVID-19 alongside, and sometimes as opposed to, mask and vaccine mandates. Utilising the framework of ‘ph...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lasco, Gideon, Yu, Vincen Gregory, Bharti, Nishtha
Format: text
Published: Archīum Ateneo 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://archium.ateneo.edu/dev-stud-faculty-pubs/149
https://archium.ateneo.edu/context/dev-stud-faculty-pubs/article/1149/viewcontent/Pharmaceutical_messianism_and_the_politics_of_COVID_19_in_the_United_States.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Ateneo De Manila University
id ph-ateneo-arc.dev-stud-faculty-pubs-1149
record_format eprints
spelling ph-ateneo-arc.dev-stud-faculty-pubs-11492024-07-16T05:33:30Z Pharmaceutical Messianism and the Politics of Covid-19 in the United States Lasco, Gideon Yu, Vincen Gregory Bharti, Nishtha Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, public officials in the United States–from the President to governors, mayors, lawmakers, and even school district commissioners–touted unproven treatments for COVID-19 alongside, and sometimes as opposed to, mask and vaccine mandates. Utilising the framework of ‘pharmaceutical messianism’, our article focuses on three such cures–hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, and monoclonal antibodies–to explore how pharmaceuticals were mobilised within politicised pandemic discourses. Using the states of Utah, Texas, and Florida as illustrative examples, we make the case for paying attention to pharmaceutical messianism at the subnational and local levels, which can very well determine pandemic responses and outcomes in contexts such as the US where subnational governments have wide autonomy. Moreover, we argue that aside from the affordability of the treatments being studied and the heterodox knowledge claiming their efficacy, the widespread uptake of these cures was also informed by popular medical (including immunological) knowledge, pre-existing attitudes toward ‘orthodox’ measures like vaccines and masks, and mistrust toward authorities and institutions identified with the ‘medical establishment’. Taken together, our case studies affirm the recurrent nature of pharmaceutical messianism in times of health crises–while also refining the concept and exposing its limitations. 2024-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://archium.ateneo.edu/dev-stud-faculty-pubs/149 https://archium.ateneo.edu/context/dev-stud-faculty-pubs/article/1149/viewcontent/Pharmaceutical_messianism_and_the_politics_of_COVID_19_in_the_United_States.pdf Development Studies Faculty Publications Archīum Ateneo COVID-19 medical populism pandemics pharmaceutical anthropology Pharmaceutical messianism politics of health Anthropology COVID-19 Medicine and Health Sciences Public Health
institution Ateneo De Manila University
building Ateneo De Manila University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider Ateneo De Manila University Library
collection archium.Ateneo Institutional Repository
topic COVID-19
medical populism
pandemics
pharmaceutical anthropology
Pharmaceutical messianism
politics of health
Anthropology
COVID-19
Medicine and Health Sciences
Public Health
spellingShingle COVID-19
medical populism
pandemics
pharmaceutical anthropology
Pharmaceutical messianism
politics of health
Anthropology
COVID-19
Medicine and Health Sciences
Public Health
Lasco, Gideon
Yu, Vincen Gregory
Bharti, Nishtha
Pharmaceutical Messianism and the Politics of Covid-19 in the United States
description Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, public officials in the United States–from the President to governors, mayors, lawmakers, and even school district commissioners–touted unproven treatments for COVID-19 alongside, and sometimes as opposed to, mask and vaccine mandates. Utilising the framework of ‘pharmaceutical messianism’, our article focuses on three such cures–hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, and monoclonal antibodies–to explore how pharmaceuticals were mobilised within politicised pandemic discourses. Using the states of Utah, Texas, and Florida as illustrative examples, we make the case for paying attention to pharmaceutical messianism at the subnational and local levels, which can very well determine pandemic responses and outcomes in contexts such as the US where subnational governments have wide autonomy. Moreover, we argue that aside from the affordability of the treatments being studied and the heterodox knowledge claiming their efficacy, the widespread uptake of these cures was also informed by popular medical (including immunological) knowledge, pre-existing attitudes toward ‘orthodox’ measures like vaccines and masks, and mistrust toward authorities and institutions identified with the ‘medical establishment’. Taken together, our case studies affirm the recurrent nature of pharmaceutical messianism in times of health crises–while also refining the concept and exposing its limitations.
format text
author Lasco, Gideon
Yu, Vincen Gregory
Bharti, Nishtha
author_facet Lasco, Gideon
Yu, Vincen Gregory
Bharti, Nishtha
author_sort Lasco, Gideon
title Pharmaceutical Messianism and the Politics of Covid-19 in the United States
title_short Pharmaceutical Messianism and the Politics of Covid-19 in the United States
title_full Pharmaceutical Messianism and the Politics of Covid-19 in the United States
title_fullStr Pharmaceutical Messianism and the Politics of Covid-19 in the United States
title_full_unstemmed Pharmaceutical Messianism and the Politics of Covid-19 in the United States
title_sort pharmaceutical messianism and the politics of covid-19 in the united states
publisher Archīum Ateneo
publishDate 2024
url https://archium.ateneo.edu/dev-stud-faculty-pubs/149
https://archium.ateneo.edu/context/dev-stud-faculty-pubs/article/1149/viewcontent/Pharmaceutical_messianism_and_the_politics_of_COVID_19_in_the_United_States.pdf
_version_ 1806061418653417472