Assessing the Collaboration Quality in the Pair Program Tracing and Debugging Eye-Tracking Experiment

We assessed the extent of collaboration of pairs of novice programmers as they traced and debugged fragments of code using cross-recurrence quantification analysis (CRQA). Specifically, we compared which among the pairs collaborated the most given a particular task. This was also a preliminary study...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Villamor, Maureen, Paredes, Yancy Vance, Samaco, Japeth Duayne, Cortez, Joanna Feliz, Martinez, Joshua, Rodrigo, Ma. Mercedes T
Format: text
Published: Archīum Ateneo 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://archium.ateneo.edu/discs-faculty-pubs/59
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318154749_Assessing_the_Collaboration_Quality_in_the_Pair_Program_Tracing_and_Debugging_Eye-Tracking_Experiment
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Ateneo De Manila University
id ph-ateneo-arc.discs-faculty-pubs-1058
record_format eprints
spelling ph-ateneo-arc.discs-faculty-pubs-10582020-04-03T09:15:25Z Assessing the Collaboration Quality in the Pair Program Tracing and Debugging Eye-Tracking Experiment Villamor, Maureen Paredes, Yancy Vance Samaco, Japeth Duayne Cortez, Joanna Feliz Martinez, Joshua Rodrigo, Ma. Mercedes T We assessed the extent of collaboration of pairs of novice programmers as they traced and debugged fragments of code using cross-recurrence quantification analysis (CRQA). Specifically, we compared which among the pairs collaborated the most given a particular task. This was also a preliminary study that looked for patterns on how the pairs categorized according to expertise collaborated. We performed a CRQA to build cross-recurrence plots using the eye tracking data and computed for the CRQA metrics, such as recurrence rate (RR), determinism (DET), entropy (ENTR), and laminarity (LAM) using the CRP toolbox for MATLAB. Findings showed that Pair 3, which consisted of both high-performers, collaborated the most because of its highest RR and DET. However, its highest ENT and LAM implied that Pair 3 struggled the most in program comprehension. We found also that all the pairs as assessed through their RR’s started with low values, peaked in the middle, declined, and increased again when the task was about to end, regardless of how well partners knew each other prior to the task. This could mean that at the start the pairs were still independently assessing how to approach the task, then they started to collaborate once comfortable but then worked independently again in an attempt to finish. 2017-06-01T07:00:00Z text https://archium.ateneo.edu/discs-faculty-pubs/59 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318154749_Assessing_the_Collaboration_Quality_in_the_Pair_Program_Tracing_and_Debugging_Eye-Tracking_Experiment Department of Information Systems & Computer Science Faculty Publications Archīum Ateneo Eye-tracking Collaboration Cross-recurrence quantification Computer Sciences
institution Ateneo De Manila University
building Ateneo De Manila University Library
country Philippines
collection archium.Ateneo Institutional Repository
topic Eye-tracking
Collaboration
Cross-recurrence quantification
Computer Sciences
spellingShingle Eye-tracking
Collaboration
Cross-recurrence quantification
Computer Sciences
Villamor, Maureen
Paredes, Yancy Vance
Samaco, Japeth Duayne
Cortez, Joanna Feliz
Martinez, Joshua
Rodrigo, Ma. Mercedes T
Assessing the Collaboration Quality in the Pair Program Tracing and Debugging Eye-Tracking Experiment
description We assessed the extent of collaboration of pairs of novice programmers as they traced and debugged fragments of code using cross-recurrence quantification analysis (CRQA). Specifically, we compared which among the pairs collaborated the most given a particular task. This was also a preliminary study that looked for patterns on how the pairs categorized according to expertise collaborated. We performed a CRQA to build cross-recurrence plots using the eye tracking data and computed for the CRQA metrics, such as recurrence rate (RR), determinism (DET), entropy (ENTR), and laminarity (LAM) using the CRP toolbox for MATLAB. Findings showed that Pair 3, which consisted of both high-performers, collaborated the most because of its highest RR and DET. However, its highest ENT and LAM implied that Pair 3 struggled the most in program comprehension. We found also that all the pairs as assessed through their RR’s started with low values, peaked in the middle, declined, and increased again when the task was about to end, regardless of how well partners knew each other prior to the task. This could mean that at the start the pairs were still independently assessing how to approach the task, then they started to collaborate once comfortable but then worked independently again in an attempt to finish.
format text
author Villamor, Maureen
Paredes, Yancy Vance
Samaco, Japeth Duayne
Cortez, Joanna Feliz
Martinez, Joshua
Rodrigo, Ma. Mercedes T
author_facet Villamor, Maureen
Paredes, Yancy Vance
Samaco, Japeth Duayne
Cortez, Joanna Feliz
Martinez, Joshua
Rodrigo, Ma. Mercedes T
author_sort Villamor, Maureen
title Assessing the Collaboration Quality in the Pair Program Tracing and Debugging Eye-Tracking Experiment
title_short Assessing the Collaboration Quality in the Pair Program Tracing and Debugging Eye-Tracking Experiment
title_full Assessing the Collaboration Quality in the Pair Program Tracing and Debugging Eye-Tracking Experiment
title_fullStr Assessing the Collaboration Quality in the Pair Program Tracing and Debugging Eye-Tracking Experiment
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the Collaboration Quality in the Pair Program Tracing and Debugging Eye-Tracking Experiment
title_sort assessing the collaboration quality in the pair program tracing and debugging eye-tracking experiment
publisher Archīum Ateneo
publishDate 2017
url https://archium.ateneo.edu/discs-faculty-pubs/59
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318154749_Assessing_the_Collaboration_Quality_in_the_Pair_Program_Tracing_and_Debugging_Eye-Tracking_Experiment
_version_ 1681506557935747072