Agrarian Reform and Democracy: Lessons from the Philippine Experience

Throughout the country’s history, agrarian reform in the Philippines has long been a combative issue and one that is often preceded by some form of instability and violence. Used mainly as a tool to garner grassroots support, agrarian reforms were formally institutionalized by setting up regulations...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lanzona, Leonardo A, Jr
Format: text
Published: Archīum Ateneo 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://archium.ateneo.edu/economics-faculty-pubs/4
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0976399619879866
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Ateneo De Manila University
id ph-ateneo-arc.economics-faculty-pubs-1002
record_format eprints
spelling ph-ateneo-arc.economics-faculty-pubs-10022020-03-25T08:07:45Z Agrarian Reform and Democracy: Lessons from the Philippine Experience Lanzona, Leonardo A, Jr Throughout the country’s history, agrarian reform in the Philippines has long been a combative issue and one that is often preceded by some form of instability and violence. Used mainly as a tool to garner grassroots support, agrarian reforms were formally institutionalized by setting up regulations on land size and contracts. Despite efforts to integrate the reforms to the markets, including the clustering of small hectares (ha) of land into large corporate estates, the benefits of the Agrarian Reform Program remained elusive under conservative demarcations set by regulations, including the definition of property rights, transformation or maintenance of state structures and the contract limitations to be formed at the production level. Land continues to be redistributed favorably to former landowner elites. This study finds that inequality in land ownership persists as the institutions set de facto political power to the elites. Under this condition, the equitable redistribution of land is an impossibility. The Philippine Agrarian Reform Programs have been hampered by high transaction costs and inadequate credible commitments, thus resulting in the erosion of market forces and elite capture of institutions. Based on agency theory, the existing regulation-based programme, which relies on the state’s power to expropriate, should give away to a more demand-driven, community-led Agrarian Reform Program that gives the parties more space to negotiate and bargain about the final allocation of the land. This involves the promulgation of relational contracts and the creation of more democratic institutions. 2019-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://archium.ateneo.edu/economics-faculty-pubs/4 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0976399619879866 Economics Department Faculty Publications Archīum Ateneo Market-led agrarian reform democracy transaction costs agency theory Philippines Economics
institution Ateneo De Manila University
building Ateneo De Manila University Library
country Philippines
collection archium.Ateneo Institutional Repository
topic Market-led agrarian reform
democracy
transaction costs
agency theory
Philippines
Economics
spellingShingle Market-led agrarian reform
democracy
transaction costs
agency theory
Philippines
Economics
Lanzona, Leonardo A, Jr
Agrarian Reform and Democracy: Lessons from the Philippine Experience
description Throughout the country’s history, agrarian reform in the Philippines has long been a combative issue and one that is often preceded by some form of instability and violence. Used mainly as a tool to garner grassroots support, agrarian reforms were formally institutionalized by setting up regulations on land size and contracts. Despite efforts to integrate the reforms to the markets, including the clustering of small hectares (ha) of land into large corporate estates, the benefits of the Agrarian Reform Program remained elusive under conservative demarcations set by regulations, including the definition of property rights, transformation or maintenance of state structures and the contract limitations to be formed at the production level. Land continues to be redistributed favorably to former landowner elites. This study finds that inequality in land ownership persists as the institutions set de facto political power to the elites. Under this condition, the equitable redistribution of land is an impossibility. The Philippine Agrarian Reform Programs have been hampered by high transaction costs and inadequate credible commitments, thus resulting in the erosion of market forces and elite capture of institutions. Based on agency theory, the existing regulation-based programme, which relies on the state’s power to expropriate, should give away to a more demand-driven, community-led Agrarian Reform Program that gives the parties more space to negotiate and bargain about the final allocation of the land. This involves the promulgation of relational contracts and the creation of more democratic institutions.
format text
author Lanzona, Leonardo A, Jr
author_facet Lanzona, Leonardo A, Jr
author_sort Lanzona, Leonardo A, Jr
title Agrarian Reform and Democracy: Lessons from the Philippine Experience
title_short Agrarian Reform and Democracy: Lessons from the Philippine Experience
title_full Agrarian Reform and Democracy: Lessons from the Philippine Experience
title_fullStr Agrarian Reform and Democracy: Lessons from the Philippine Experience
title_full_unstemmed Agrarian Reform and Democracy: Lessons from the Philippine Experience
title_sort agrarian reform and democracy: lessons from the philippine experience
publisher Archīum Ateneo
publishDate 2019
url https://archium.ateneo.edu/economics-faculty-pubs/4
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0976399619879866
_version_ 1681506560498466816