Risk Management and Coping Strategies

This paper attempts to explore the use of an OECD Multi-Dimensional Country Review (MDCR) framework in understanding the long-term development history of the Philippines. The MDCR recognizes the multiplicity of development objectives countries usually pursue and therefore the associated multiplicity...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ravago, Majah-Leah V, Roumasset, James, Jandoc, Karl
Format: text
Published: Archīum Ateneo 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://archium.ateneo.edu/economics-faculty-pubs/30
https://ideas.repec.org/p/phs/dpaper/201515.html
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Ateneo De Manila University
id ph-ateneo-arc.economics-faculty-pubs-1029
record_format eprints
spelling ph-ateneo-arc.economics-faculty-pubs-10292020-06-04T09:46:44Z Risk Management and Coping Strategies Ravago, Majah-Leah V Roumasset, James Jandoc, Karl This paper attempts to explore the use of an OECD Multi-Dimensional Country Review (MDCR) framework in understanding the long-term development history of the Philippines. The MDCR recognizes the multiplicity of development objectives countries usually pursue and therefore the associated multiplicity of challenges and opportunities. Following a conventional dichotomy of explaining the country’s development dynamics into economic and non-economic factors, the paper reviews the historical economic record and examines more recent non-economic hypotheses. While the latter is mostly political explanations it tries to link them to economic outcomes yet it is weak in tracing the mechanisms of the linkage despite using more rigorous methodologies. The paper then proceeds with hypothesizing that the long-term (political) behavior of breaking the country into finer geographical (and political) entities has been inimical to its sustainable long-term (economic) growth. The splitting of provinces, creation of new ones, of legislating more congressional districts, and further break-up of even the lowest government levels clearly fragment markets, raise real financial and transactions costs, bloat government budgets and the bureaucracy, and add burden to the private sector environment. Partial evidence is explored showing this behavior along the country’s long-term development history and some policy directions are suggested. 2015-11-01T07:00:00Z text https://archium.ateneo.edu/economics-faculty-pubs/30 https://ideas.repec.org/p/phs/dpaper/201515.html Economics Department Faculty Publications Archīum Ateneo Economics Growth and Development
institution Ateneo De Manila University
building Ateneo De Manila University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider Ateneo De Manila University Library
collection archium.Ateneo Institutional Repository
topic Economics
Growth and Development
spellingShingle Economics
Growth and Development
Ravago, Majah-Leah V
Roumasset, James
Jandoc, Karl
Risk Management and Coping Strategies
description This paper attempts to explore the use of an OECD Multi-Dimensional Country Review (MDCR) framework in understanding the long-term development history of the Philippines. The MDCR recognizes the multiplicity of development objectives countries usually pursue and therefore the associated multiplicity of challenges and opportunities. Following a conventional dichotomy of explaining the country’s development dynamics into economic and non-economic factors, the paper reviews the historical economic record and examines more recent non-economic hypotheses. While the latter is mostly political explanations it tries to link them to economic outcomes yet it is weak in tracing the mechanisms of the linkage despite using more rigorous methodologies. The paper then proceeds with hypothesizing that the long-term (political) behavior of breaking the country into finer geographical (and political) entities has been inimical to its sustainable long-term (economic) growth. The splitting of provinces, creation of new ones, of legislating more congressional districts, and further break-up of even the lowest government levels clearly fragment markets, raise real financial and transactions costs, bloat government budgets and the bureaucracy, and add burden to the private sector environment. Partial evidence is explored showing this behavior along the country’s long-term development history and some policy directions are suggested.
format text
author Ravago, Majah-Leah V
Roumasset, James
Jandoc, Karl
author_facet Ravago, Majah-Leah V
Roumasset, James
Jandoc, Karl
author_sort Ravago, Majah-Leah V
title Risk Management and Coping Strategies
title_short Risk Management and Coping Strategies
title_full Risk Management and Coping Strategies
title_fullStr Risk Management and Coping Strategies
title_full_unstemmed Risk Management and Coping Strategies
title_sort risk management and coping strategies
publisher Archīum Ateneo
publishDate 2015
url https://archium.ateneo.edu/economics-faculty-pubs/30
https://ideas.repec.org/p/phs/dpaper/201515.html
_version_ 1722366527497306112