Decentralization and Development Outcomes: What Does the Empirical Literature Really Say?

This article critically reviews the empirical literature on decentralization and its relationship with development outcomes. The analysis suggests that revenue decentralization and fiscal independence, or the ability of local governments to raise their own revenue rather than relying on transfers fr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Canare, Tristan A
Format: text
Published: Archīum Ateneo 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://archium.ateneo.edu/economics-faculty-pubs/155
https://hpe-rpe.org/wpfd_file/decentralization-and-development-outcomes-what-does-the-empirical-literature-really-say-2/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Ateneo De Manila University
Description
Summary:This article critically reviews the empirical literature on decentralization and its relationship with development outcomes. The analysis suggests that revenue decentralization and fiscal independence, or the ability of local governments to raise their own revenue rather than relying on transfers from the national government, are the decentralization types most positively associated with development outcomes. Expenditure decentralization has no clear trend. In terms of development outcomes, most of the studies reviewed found evidence that good governance is positively associated with decentralization; but the evidence is mixed on economic growth. Some suggestions were also made for future decentralization studies.