Balancing Paradigms in Climate Change Communication Research to Support Climate Services

Initiatives such as the Global Framework for Climate Services (GFCS) and Future Earth aim for co-design and co-production to create specific climate services, which in turn, require dialogue with stakeholders. Climate change communication research can help enable this dialogue. This paper proposes a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gotangco, Charlotte Kendra Z, Ponce de Leon, Inez Z
Format: text
Published: Archīum Ateneo 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://archium.ateneo.edu/es-faculty-pubs/48
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-69838-0_12
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Ateneo De Manila University
id ph-ateneo-arc.es-faculty-pubs-1047
record_format eprints
spelling ph-ateneo-arc.es-faculty-pubs-10472020-06-25T10:30:12Z Balancing Paradigms in Climate Change Communication Research to Support Climate Services Gotangco, Charlotte Kendra Z Ponce de Leon, Inez Z Initiatives such as the Global Framework for Climate Services (GFCS) and Future Earth aim for co-design and co-production to create specific climate services, which in turn, require dialogue with stakeholders. Climate change communication research can help enable this dialogue. This paper proposes a more explicit articulation of the paradigms grounding climate change communication research to provide more balanced research for climate services. Paradigms or worldviews contain assumptions about the nature of reality and knowledge, and therefore drive the construction of research questions and methodologies. An assessment of peer-reviewed articles between January 2010 and August 2014 using the key phrase “climate change communication” reflects research paradigms that are dominantly post-positivist, seeking large-scale patterns to make generalizations. While these are useful, climate change communication research must also consider what approaches would value and use stakeholders’ differing perspectives towards encouraging dialogue and implementing long-term solutions with purveyors of climate services. Future research should balance the approach by exploring the use of constructivist or critical paradigms to support dialogue-based climate services. Such research is valuable in addressing the need for climate change communication professionals and scholars to (1) localize messages and (2) frame them in terms of values and issues pertinent to specific populations and groups. 2017-12-30T08:00:00Z text https://archium.ateneo.edu/es-faculty-pubs/48 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-69838-0_12 Environmental Science Faculty Publications Archīum Ateneo Climate change communication Paradigms Climate services Climate change communication research Dialogue-based climate services Environmental Sciences Other Environmental Sciences
institution Ateneo De Manila University
building Ateneo De Manila University Library
country Philippines
collection archium.Ateneo Institutional Repository
topic Climate change communication
Paradigms
Climate services
Climate change communication research
Dialogue-based climate services
Environmental Sciences
Other Environmental Sciences
spellingShingle Climate change communication
Paradigms
Climate services
Climate change communication research
Dialogue-based climate services
Environmental Sciences
Other Environmental Sciences
Gotangco, Charlotte Kendra Z
Ponce de Leon, Inez Z
Balancing Paradigms in Climate Change Communication Research to Support Climate Services
description Initiatives such as the Global Framework for Climate Services (GFCS) and Future Earth aim for co-design and co-production to create specific climate services, which in turn, require dialogue with stakeholders. Climate change communication research can help enable this dialogue. This paper proposes a more explicit articulation of the paradigms grounding climate change communication research to provide more balanced research for climate services. Paradigms or worldviews contain assumptions about the nature of reality and knowledge, and therefore drive the construction of research questions and methodologies. An assessment of peer-reviewed articles between January 2010 and August 2014 using the key phrase “climate change communication” reflects research paradigms that are dominantly post-positivist, seeking large-scale patterns to make generalizations. While these are useful, climate change communication research must also consider what approaches would value and use stakeholders’ differing perspectives towards encouraging dialogue and implementing long-term solutions with purveyors of climate services. Future research should balance the approach by exploring the use of constructivist or critical paradigms to support dialogue-based climate services. Such research is valuable in addressing the need for climate change communication professionals and scholars to (1) localize messages and (2) frame them in terms of values and issues pertinent to specific populations and groups.
format text
author Gotangco, Charlotte Kendra Z
Ponce de Leon, Inez Z
author_facet Gotangco, Charlotte Kendra Z
Ponce de Leon, Inez Z
author_sort Gotangco, Charlotte Kendra Z
title Balancing Paradigms in Climate Change Communication Research to Support Climate Services
title_short Balancing Paradigms in Climate Change Communication Research to Support Climate Services
title_full Balancing Paradigms in Climate Change Communication Research to Support Climate Services
title_fullStr Balancing Paradigms in Climate Change Communication Research to Support Climate Services
title_full_unstemmed Balancing Paradigms in Climate Change Communication Research to Support Climate Services
title_sort balancing paradigms in climate change communication research to support climate services
publisher Archīum Ateneo
publishDate 2017
url https://archium.ateneo.edu/es-faculty-pubs/48
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-69838-0_12
_version_ 1681506691793813504