Marcos’ Agrarian Reform: Promises, Contradictions, and Lessons

The paper is a reexamination of Presidential Decree 27, the agrarian reform law signed by Pres. Ferdinand Marcos on October 21, 1972. Previous studies of the topic proved to be critical of its outcomes but failed to mention the innovations made by Marcos’ agrarian reform program. A month earlier, Ma...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mendoza, Meynardo P
Format: text
Published: Archīum Ateneo 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://archium.ateneo.edu/history-faculty-pubs/56
https://unitasust.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/UNITAS-94-1-Mendoza-Marcos-Agrarian-Reform.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Ateneo De Manila University
id ph-ateneo-arc.history-faculty-pubs-1054
record_format eprints
spelling ph-ateneo-arc.history-faculty-pubs-10542022-02-14T02:56:24Z Marcos’ Agrarian Reform: Promises, Contradictions, and Lessons Mendoza, Meynardo P The paper is a reexamination of Presidential Decree 27, the agrarian reform law signed by Pres. Ferdinand Marcos on October 21, 1972. Previous studies of the topic proved to be critical of its outcomes but failed to mention the innovations made by Marcos’ agrarian reform program. A month earlier, Marcos signed Presidential Decree 2 which abolished sharecropping or tenancy in rice and corn lands in the country and Presidential Decree 27 further advanced tenurial relations by introducing the concept of land ownership to peasants. In addition, the program included technical and financial support to ensure productivity and the program’s viability. Moreover, the program required peasants to bond themselves into cooperatives as a way of weaning them from dependence on landowners. Notwithstanding the beneficial intent and design of the program, it was hobbled by succeeding laws and directives that contradicted its aims and objectives. Finally, the non-inclusion of coconut and sugar farms in agrarian reform only highlighted the disparity between these groups of farmers with those in rice and corn areas, a stark difference that became a rallying issue against the Marcos regime as well as an advocacy in the post-Marcos era that aspired for a more inclusive agrarian reform coverage. 2021-05-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://archium.ateneo.edu/history-faculty-pubs/56 https://unitasust.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/UNITAS-94-1-Mendoza-Marcos-Agrarian-Reform.pdf History Department Faculty Publications Archīum Ateneo Agrarian reform Presidential Decree 27 Marcos land reform Masagana 99 Samahang Nayon Agriculture History Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration
institution Ateneo De Manila University
building Ateneo De Manila University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider Ateneo De Manila University Library
collection archium.Ateneo Institutional Repository
topic Agrarian reform
Presidential Decree 27
Marcos land reform
Masagana 99
Samahang Nayon
Agriculture
History
Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration
spellingShingle Agrarian reform
Presidential Decree 27
Marcos land reform
Masagana 99
Samahang Nayon
Agriculture
History
Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration
Mendoza, Meynardo P
Marcos’ Agrarian Reform: Promises, Contradictions, and Lessons
description The paper is a reexamination of Presidential Decree 27, the agrarian reform law signed by Pres. Ferdinand Marcos on October 21, 1972. Previous studies of the topic proved to be critical of its outcomes but failed to mention the innovations made by Marcos’ agrarian reform program. A month earlier, Marcos signed Presidential Decree 2 which abolished sharecropping or tenancy in rice and corn lands in the country and Presidential Decree 27 further advanced tenurial relations by introducing the concept of land ownership to peasants. In addition, the program included technical and financial support to ensure productivity and the program’s viability. Moreover, the program required peasants to bond themselves into cooperatives as a way of weaning them from dependence on landowners. Notwithstanding the beneficial intent and design of the program, it was hobbled by succeeding laws and directives that contradicted its aims and objectives. Finally, the non-inclusion of coconut and sugar farms in agrarian reform only highlighted the disparity between these groups of farmers with those in rice and corn areas, a stark difference that became a rallying issue against the Marcos regime as well as an advocacy in the post-Marcos era that aspired for a more inclusive agrarian reform coverage.
format text
author Mendoza, Meynardo P
author_facet Mendoza, Meynardo P
author_sort Mendoza, Meynardo P
title Marcos’ Agrarian Reform: Promises, Contradictions, and Lessons
title_short Marcos’ Agrarian Reform: Promises, Contradictions, and Lessons
title_full Marcos’ Agrarian Reform: Promises, Contradictions, and Lessons
title_fullStr Marcos’ Agrarian Reform: Promises, Contradictions, and Lessons
title_full_unstemmed Marcos’ Agrarian Reform: Promises, Contradictions, and Lessons
title_sort marcos’ agrarian reform: promises, contradictions, and lessons
publisher Archīum Ateneo
publishDate 2021
url https://archium.ateneo.edu/history-faculty-pubs/56
https://unitasust.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/UNITAS-94-1-Mendoza-Marcos-Agrarian-Reform.pdf
_version_ 1726158612733100032