Marcos’ Agrarian Reform: Promises, Contradictions, and Lessons
The paper is a reexamination of Presidential Decree 27, the agrarian reform law signed by Pres. Ferdinand Marcos on October 21, 1972. Previous studies of the topic proved to be critical of its outcomes but failed to mention the innovations made by Marcos’ agrarian reform program. A month earlier, Ma...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Published: |
Archīum Ateneo
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://archium.ateneo.edu/history-faculty-pubs/56 https://unitasust.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/UNITAS-94-1-Mendoza-Marcos-Agrarian-Reform.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Ateneo De Manila University |
id |
ph-ateneo-arc.history-faculty-pubs-1054 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
ph-ateneo-arc.history-faculty-pubs-10542022-02-14T02:56:24Z Marcos’ Agrarian Reform: Promises, Contradictions, and Lessons Mendoza, Meynardo P The paper is a reexamination of Presidential Decree 27, the agrarian reform law signed by Pres. Ferdinand Marcos on October 21, 1972. Previous studies of the topic proved to be critical of its outcomes but failed to mention the innovations made by Marcos’ agrarian reform program. A month earlier, Marcos signed Presidential Decree 2 which abolished sharecropping or tenancy in rice and corn lands in the country and Presidential Decree 27 further advanced tenurial relations by introducing the concept of land ownership to peasants. In addition, the program included technical and financial support to ensure productivity and the program’s viability. Moreover, the program required peasants to bond themselves into cooperatives as a way of weaning them from dependence on landowners. Notwithstanding the beneficial intent and design of the program, it was hobbled by succeeding laws and directives that contradicted its aims and objectives. Finally, the non-inclusion of coconut and sugar farms in agrarian reform only highlighted the disparity between these groups of farmers with those in rice and corn areas, a stark difference that became a rallying issue against the Marcos regime as well as an advocacy in the post-Marcos era that aspired for a more inclusive agrarian reform coverage. 2021-05-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://archium.ateneo.edu/history-faculty-pubs/56 https://unitasust.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/UNITAS-94-1-Mendoza-Marcos-Agrarian-Reform.pdf History Department Faculty Publications Archīum Ateneo Agrarian reform Presidential Decree 27 Marcos land reform Masagana 99 Samahang Nayon Agriculture History Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration |
institution |
Ateneo De Manila University |
building |
Ateneo De Manila University Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Philippines Philippines |
content_provider |
Ateneo De Manila University Library |
collection |
archium.Ateneo Institutional Repository |
topic |
Agrarian reform Presidential Decree 27 Marcos land reform Masagana 99 Samahang Nayon Agriculture History Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration |
spellingShingle |
Agrarian reform Presidential Decree 27 Marcos land reform Masagana 99 Samahang Nayon Agriculture History Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Mendoza, Meynardo P Marcos’ Agrarian Reform: Promises, Contradictions, and Lessons |
description |
The paper is a reexamination of Presidential Decree 27, the agrarian reform law signed by Pres. Ferdinand Marcos on October 21, 1972. Previous studies of the topic proved to be critical of its outcomes but failed to mention the innovations made by Marcos’ agrarian reform program. A month earlier, Marcos signed Presidential Decree 2 which abolished sharecropping or tenancy in rice and corn lands in the country and Presidential Decree 27 further advanced tenurial relations by introducing the concept of land ownership to peasants. In addition, the program included technical and financial support to ensure productivity and the program’s viability. Moreover, the program required peasants to bond themselves into cooperatives as a way of weaning them from dependence on landowners. Notwithstanding the beneficial intent and design of the program, it was hobbled by succeeding laws and directives that contradicted its aims and objectives. Finally, the non-inclusion of coconut and sugar farms in agrarian reform only highlighted the disparity between these groups of farmers with those in rice and corn areas, a stark difference that became a rallying issue against the Marcos regime as well as an advocacy in the post-Marcos era that aspired for a more inclusive agrarian reform coverage. |
format |
text |
author |
Mendoza, Meynardo P |
author_facet |
Mendoza, Meynardo P |
author_sort |
Mendoza, Meynardo P |
title |
Marcos’ Agrarian Reform: Promises, Contradictions, and Lessons |
title_short |
Marcos’ Agrarian Reform: Promises, Contradictions, and Lessons |
title_full |
Marcos’ Agrarian Reform: Promises, Contradictions, and Lessons |
title_fullStr |
Marcos’ Agrarian Reform: Promises, Contradictions, and Lessons |
title_full_unstemmed |
Marcos’ Agrarian Reform: Promises, Contradictions, and Lessons |
title_sort |
marcos’ agrarian reform: promises, contradictions, and lessons |
publisher |
Archīum Ateneo |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://archium.ateneo.edu/history-faculty-pubs/56 https://unitasust.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/UNITAS-94-1-Mendoza-Marcos-Agrarian-Reform.pdf |
_version_ |
1726158612733100032 |