National Multisectoral Governance Challenges of Implementing the Philippines' Reproductive Health Law

• Main Authors: Siy Van, Vanessa T, Uy, Jhanna, Bagas, Joy, Ulep, Valerie Gilbert T
• Format: text
• Published: Archīum Ateneo 2021
• Subjects: Philippines; Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Law; multi-sectoral governance; decentralization; civil society organizations; Health Law and Policy; Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration
• Online Access: https://archium.ateneo.edu/hs-faculty-pubs/10; https://academic.oup.com/heapol/advance-article/doi/10.1093/heapol/czab092/6338609
• Institution: Ateneo De Manila University

In recognition of the role of reproductive health in individual and national development; the Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health (RPRH) Law of 2012 was passed in the Philippines after 30 years of opposition and debate. Seven years later; this article examined the cohesiveness of national multi-sectoral governance among state and non-state actors and identified challenges in coordination as part of the first comprehensive evaluation of the landmark policy. Using a qualitative intrinsic case study design and guided by the World Health Organization's systems checklist for governing health equity as our theoretical perspective; we conducted 20 semi-structured interviews with national implementers from health agencies (n=11); non-health agencies (n=6) and non-state actors (n=3) that included civil society organizations (CSOs). Key themes identified through thematic analysis were supported with document reviews of policy issuances; accomplishment reports and meeting transcripts of the RPRH National Implementation Team (NIT). The study found that despite aspirations for vibrant multi-sectoral coordination; the implementation of the RPRH Law in the Philippines was incohesive. National leaders; particularly the health sector; were unable to rally non-health sector actors around RPRH nor strategically harness the power of CSOs. Local resource limitations associated with decentralization were exacerbated by paternalistic financing; coordination; and monitoring. The absence of multi-agency plans fostered a culture of siloed opportunism; without consideration to integrated implementation. This case study shows that even for neutral policies; the interest and buy-in of non-health state actors cannot be assumed. Moreover; possible conflicts in interests and perspectives between state and civil society actors must be managed. Overall; there is need for participatory policymaking and health-sector advocacy to set health equity as an intersectoral goal; involving subnational leaders in developing concrete action plans; and strengthening NIT's accountability systems.