But for the Apocalypse: Wilfrido Nolledo’s Dark Mirror of Empire

This essay reads Wilfrido Nolledo’s novel, But for the Lovers (1970), across the rocky terrain in which the postcolonial Anglophone novel intersects with the question of postmodernity. Using Paul Ricoeur’s Memory, History, and Forgetting and Fredric Jameson’s exhortation to the critic to “Always his...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Canlas, Ryan
Format: text
Published: Archīum Ateneo 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://archium.ateneo.edu/kk/vol1/iss24/7
https://archium.ateneo.edu/context/kk/article/1614/viewcontent/_5BKKv00n24_2015_5D_202.6_Article_Canlas.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Ateneo De Manila University
id ph-ateneo-arc.kk-1614
record_format eprints
spelling ph-ateneo-arc.kk-16142024-12-18T09:18:02Z But for the Apocalypse: Wilfrido Nolledo’s Dark Mirror of Empire Canlas, Ryan This essay reads Wilfrido Nolledo’s novel, But for the Lovers (1970), across the rocky terrain in which the postcolonial Anglophone novel intersects with the question of postmodernity. Using Paul Ricoeur’s Memory, History, and Forgetting and Fredric Jameson’s exhortation to the critic to “Always historicize!” as my primary theoretical frameworks, I argue against the seemingly common accusation that the “postmodern” Anglophone Filipino novel––of which But for the Lovers is a kind of prototypical example––is incapable of creating a perspective on the political and historical conditions of the Philippines as a postcolonial nation and that it is merely symptomatic of the much larger political, social, and cultural malaise characteristic of the current political economic and cultural moment. My argument is that But for the Lovers forces the critic to resituate her perspective on the problems of Philippine nationalism by linking it to the question of the novel’s style: only by doing so can the way that history and fiction narrate and produce knowledge about the past be interrogated. Ultimately, I argue that But for the Lovers demonstrates that the ultimate horizon for any reading of Anglophone Philippine fiction is not just history, but the unassailable historical condition of US imperialism in the Philippines. The novel’s apocalyptic finale, I suggest, dramatizes the large-scale violence and genocide that founds, as historian Dylan Rodriguez argues, the moment of US-Philippine “contact” in the early twentieth century, and in this way conditions the very possibility of a Filipino literature in English. 2024-12-18T13:12:32Z text application/pdf https://archium.ateneo.edu/kk/vol1/iss24/7 info:doi/10.13185/1656-152x.1614 https://archium.ateneo.edu/context/kk/article/1614/viewcontent/_5BKKv00n24_2015_5D_202.6_Article_Canlas.pdf Kritika Kultura Archīum Ateneo Filipino Novels in English Postmodernity Postcoloniality Genocide Historiography World War II Manifest Destiny Philippine American War Filipino Novels in English
institution Ateneo De Manila University
building Ateneo De Manila University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider Ateneo De Manila University Library
collection archium.Ateneo Institutional Repository
topic Filipino Novels in English
Postmodernity
Postcoloniality
Genocide
Historiography
World War II
Manifest Destiny
Philippine American War
Filipino Novels in English
spellingShingle Filipino Novels in English
Postmodernity
Postcoloniality
Genocide
Historiography
World War II
Manifest Destiny
Philippine American War
Filipino Novels in English
Canlas, Ryan
But for the Apocalypse: Wilfrido Nolledo’s Dark Mirror of Empire
description This essay reads Wilfrido Nolledo’s novel, But for the Lovers (1970), across the rocky terrain in which the postcolonial Anglophone novel intersects with the question of postmodernity. Using Paul Ricoeur’s Memory, History, and Forgetting and Fredric Jameson’s exhortation to the critic to “Always historicize!” as my primary theoretical frameworks, I argue against the seemingly common accusation that the “postmodern” Anglophone Filipino novel––of which But for the Lovers is a kind of prototypical example––is incapable of creating a perspective on the political and historical conditions of the Philippines as a postcolonial nation and that it is merely symptomatic of the much larger political, social, and cultural malaise characteristic of the current political economic and cultural moment. My argument is that But for the Lovers forces the critic to resituate her perspective on the problems of Philippine nationalism by linking it to the question of the novel’s style: only by doing so can the way that history and fiction narrate and produce knowledge about the past be interrogated. Ultimately, I argue that But for the Lovers demonstrates that the ultimate horizon for any reading of Anglophone Philippine fiction is not just history, but the unassailable historical condition of US imperialism in the Philippines. The novel’s apocalyptic finale, I suggest, dramatizes the large-scale violence and genocide that founds, as historian Dylan Rodriguez argues, the moment of US-Philippine “contact” in the early twentieth century, and in this way conditions the very possibility of a Filipino literature in English.
format text
author Canlas, Ryan
author_facet Canlas, Ryan
author_sort Canlas, Ryan
title But for the Apocalypse: Wilfrido Nolledo’s Dark Mirror of Empire
title_short But for the Apocalypse: Wilfrido Nolledo’s Dark Mirror of Empire
title_full But for the Apocalypse: Wilfrido Nolledo’s Dark Mirror of Empire
title_fullStr But for the Apocalypse: Wilfrido Nolledo’s Dark Mirror of Empire
title_full_unstemmed But for the Apocalypse: Wilfrido Nolledo’s Dark Mirror of Empire
title_sort but for the apocalypse: wilfrido nolledo’s dark mirror of empire
publisher Archīum Ateneo
publishDate 2024
url https://archium.ateneo.edu/kk/vol1/iss24/7
https://archium.ateneo.edu/context/kk/article/1614/viewcontent/_5BKKv00n24_2015_5D_202.6_Article_Canlas.pdf
_version_ 1819113730071330816