Humanizing Corporeal Spectacle: Humor and Resistance in Indra Sinha's Animal's People

This article examines Indra Sinha’s Animal’s People and the comments it makes about the long- term corporeal effects of environmental catastrophes. Sinha’s choice of a first person narrative strategy strongly sharpens the visceral impact of the story. The narrator is a lovably unlovable misfit who h...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Estok, Simon C.
Format: text
Published: Archīum Ateneo 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://archium.ateneo.edu/kk/vol1/iss38/20
https://archium.ateneo.edu/context/kk/article/1923/viewcontent/KK_2038_2C_202022_2020_20Forum_20Kritika_20on_20Theorizing_20Corporeality_20in_20the_20Climate_20Change_20Era_20__20Estok.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Ateneo De Manila University
id ph-ateneo-arc.kk-1923
record_format eprints
spelling ph-ateneo-arc.kk-19232024-12-19T04:00:04Z Humanizing Corporeal Spectacle: Humor and Resistance in Indra Sinha's Animal's People Estok, Simon C. This article examines Indra Sinha’s Animal’s People and the comments it makes about the long- term corporeal effects of environmental catastrophes. Sinha’s choice of a first person narrative strategy strongly sharpens the visceral impact of the story. The narrator is a lovably unlovable misfit who has been deformed and crippled by an industrial disaster that claimed thousands of lives. While the effects of the disaster play out through the body of the narrator himself (he calls himself “Animal” because he is so deformed), they are more than merely bodily effects: they are psychological, social, economic, developmental, sexual, and so on. Animal is a spectacle, and his very existence calls into question the boundary between what is human and what is not. The story he tells reveals the effects of capitalist racism and greed and raises questions about environmental justice issues and corporate responsibility. These are important questions that are inseparable from the material facts of Animal’s broken body. It is a deadly serious topic that Animal narrates, but he does it with humor (often self-deprecating), and it is precisely this humor that ultimately both humanizes him and intensifies the impact of the narrative itself. 2024-12-19T06:07:30Z text application/pdf https://archium.ateneo.edu/kk/vol1/iss38/20 info:doi/10.13185/1656-152x.1923 https://archium.ateneo.edu/context/kk/article/1923/viewcontent/KK_2038_2C_202022_2020_20Forum_20Kritika_20on_20Theorizing_20Corporeality_20in_20the_20Climate_20Change_20Era_20__20Estok.pdf Kritika Kultura Archīum Ateneo corporeal theory; monstrosity; disability studies; ecocriticism; narrative method
institution Ateneo De Manila University
building Ateneo De Manila University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider Ateneo De Manila University Library
collection archium.Ateneo Institutional Repository
topic corporeal theory; monstrosity; disability studies; ecocriticism; narrative method
spellingShingle corporeal theory; monstrosity; disability studies; ecocriticism; narrative method
Estok, Simon C.
Humanizing Corporeal Spectacle: Humor and Resistance in Indra Sinha's Animal's People
description This article examines Indra Sinha’s Animal’s People and the comments it makes about the long- term corporeal effects of environmental catastrophes. Sinha’s choice of a first person narrative strategy strongly sharpens the visceral impact of the story. The narrator is a lovably unlovable misfit who has been deformed and crippled by an industrial disaster that claimed thousands of lives. While the effects of the disaster play out through the body of the narrator himself (he calls himself “Animal” because he is so deformed), they are more than merely bodily effects: they are psychological, social, economic, developmental, sexual, and so on. Animal is a spectacle, and his very existence calls into question the boundary between what is human and what is not. The story he tells reveals the effects of capitalist racism and greed and raises questions about environmental justice issues and corporate responsibility. These are important questions that are inseparable from the material facts of Animal’s broken body. It is a deadly serious topic that Animal narrates, but he does it with humor (often self-deprecating), and it is precisely this humor that ultimately both humanizes him and intensifies the impact of the narrative itself.
format text
author Estok, Simon C.
author_facet Estok, Simon C.
author_sort Estok, Simon C.
title Humanizing Corporeal Spectacle: Humor and Resistance in Indra Sinha's Animal's People
title_short Humanizing Corporeal Spectacle: Humor and Resistance in Indra Sinha's Animal's People
title_full Humanizing Corporeal Spectacle: Humor and Resistance in Indra Sinha's Animal's People
title_fullStr Humanizing Corporeal Spectacle: Humor and Resistance in Indra Sinha's Animal's People
title_full_unstemmed Humanizing Corporeal Spectacle: Humor and Resistance in Indra Sinha's Animal's People
title_sort humanizing corporeal spectacle: humor and resistance in indra sinha's animal's people
publisher Archīum Ateneo
publishDate 2024
url https://archium.ateneo.edu/kk/vol1/iss38/20
https://archium.ateneo.edu/context/kk/article/1923/viewcontent/KK_2038_2C_202022_2020_20Forum_20Kritika_20on_20Theorizing_20Corporeality_20in_20the_20Climate_20Change_20Era_20__20Estok.pdf
_version_ 1819113820885352448