A Critique on the Practice of Filial Piety in Confucian Culture

The concept of filial piety has initially served as a social ethic in order to sustain the hierarchical family relationships in Confucian culture. Filial piety has also been implemented as an ideological weapon in an attempt to inculcate broader political virtue into the minds of people in Confucian...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kim, Donghyun
Format: text
Published: Archīum Ateneo 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://archium.ateneo.edu/kk/vol1/iss39/22
https://archium.ateneo.edu/context/kk/article/2001/viewcontent/KK_2039_2C_202022_2021_20Forum_20Kritika_20in_20Honor_20of_20Edel_20E._20Garcellano_20__20Kim.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Ateneo De Manila University
id ph-ateneo-arc.kk-2001
record_format eprints
spelling ph-ateneo-arc.kk-20012024-12-19T05:24:02Z A Critique on the Practice of Filial Piety in Confucian Culture Kim, Donghyun The concept of filial piety has initially served as a social ethic in order to sustain the hierarchical family relationships in Confucian culture. Filial piety has also been implemented as an ideological weapon in an attempt to inculcate broader political virtue into the minds of people in Confucian culture. In essence, the everyday practice of filial piety denotes a mode of concrete ethical life, which fundamentally binds participants’ way of thinking to a particular tradition. However, such binding is not the result of a discursive procedure that provides a rational grounding to social and political authority. Given the difficulties with accepting the taken-for- granted ethical value in a particular culture—namely, that the practice of filial piety is an implicit rejection of the reciprocal and free relationship between parents and their children—the critical examination of ethical life through the application of moral standards (the universal principle) should be reconsidered. Thus, the structure of social hierarchy is a common phenomenon in Confucian culture that has had a profound influence on people’s perceptions. The practical purpose of critique depends on human emancipation, which suggests possibilities for social change in terms of how human beings live a free life in society. To this end, this paper critically analyzes the efficacy of filial piety in Confucian culture by observing Habermas’s theories of communicative action and discourse ethics. Ultimately, this paper argues that the tenet of filial piety in Confucian culture, in general, and the practice of South Korean Confucian culture, in particular, amounts to a rejection of the “iron cage” of the taken-for-granted tradition by virtue of the normative grounding of justification. 2024-12-19T06:08:05Z text application/pdf https://archium.ateneo.edu/kk/vol1/iss39/22 info:doi/10.13185/1656-152x.2001 https://archium.ateneo.edu/context/kk/article/2001/viewcontent/KK_2039_2C_202022_2021_20Forum_20Kritika_20in_20Honor_20of_20Edel_20E._20Garcellano_20__20Kim.pdf Kritika Kultura Archīum Ateneo Confucianism filial piety ideology critique Jürgen Habermas South Korean Confucian culture validity claim
institution Ateneo De Manila University
building Ateneo De Manila University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider Ateneo De Manila University Library
collection archium.Ateneo Institutional Repository
topic Confucianism
filial piety
ideology critique
Jürgen Habermas
South Korean Confucian culture
validity claim
spellingShingle Confucianism
filial piety
ideology critique
Jürgen Habermas
South Korean Confucian culture
validity claim
Kim, Donghyun
A Critique on the Practice of Filial Piety in Confucian Culture
description The concept of filial piety has initially served as a social ethic in order to sustain the hierarchical family relationships in Confucian culture. Filial piety has also been implemented as an ideological weapon in an attempt to inculcate broader political virtue into the minds of people in Confucian culture. In essence, the everyday practice of filial piety denotes a mode of concrete ethical life, which fundamentally binds participants’ way of thinking to a particular tradition. However, such binding is not the result of a discursive procedure that provides a rational grounding to social and political authority. Given the difficulties with accepting the taken-for- granted ethical value in a particular culture—namely, that the practice of filial piety is an implicit rejection of the reciprocal and free relationship between parents and their children—the critical examination of ethical life through the application of moral standards (the universal principle) should be reconsidered. Thus, the structure of social hierarchy is a common phenomenon in Confucian culture that has had a profound influence on people’s perceptions. The practical purpose of critique depends on human emancipation, which suggests possibilities for social change in terms of how human beings live a free life in society. To this end, this paper critically analyzes the efficacy of filial piety in Confucian culture by observing Habermas’s theories of communicative action and discourse ethics. Ultimately, this paper argues that the tenet of filial piety in Confucian culture, in general, and the practice of South Korean Confucian culture, in particular, amounts to a rejection of the “iron cage” of the taken-for-granted tradition by virtue of the normative grounding of justification.
format text
author Kim, Donghyun
author_facet Kim, Donghyun
author_sort Kim, Donghyun
title A Critique on the Practice of Filial Piety in Confucian Culture
title_short A Critique on the Practice of Filial Piety in Confucian Culture
title_full A Critique on the Practice of Filial Piety in Confucian Culture
title_fullStr A Critique on the Practice of Filial Piety in Confucian Culture
title_full_unstemmed A Critique on the Practice of Filial Piety in Confucian Culture
title_sort critique on the practice of filial piety in confucian culture
publisher Archīum Ateneo
publishDate 2024
url https://archium.ateneo.edu/kk/vol1/iss39/22
https://archium.ateneo.edu/context/kk/article/2001/viewcontent/KK_2039_2C_202022_2021_20Forum_20Kritika_20in_20Honor_20of_20Edel_20E._20Garcellano_20__20Kim.pdf
_version_ 1819113830491357184