Beyond Instrumentalism: Exploring the Affordance Construal of Technology in Heidegger

Current philosophies of technology derived from and inspired by Heidegger’s—exemplified by Postphenomenology and Critical Constructivism—have favored a focus on technological design issues; succumbing consequently; to an instrumental view of technology. This favored focus had contributed to an obliv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lagdameo, Federico Jose
Format: text
Published: Archīum Ateneo 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://archium.ateneo.edu/philo-faculty-pubs/88
https://archium.ateneo.edu/context/philo-faculty-pubs/article/1087/viewcontent/lagdameo_april2023.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Ateneo De Manila University
id ph-ateneo-arc.philo-faculty-pubs-1087
record_format eprints
spelling ph-ateneo-arc.philo-faculty-pubs-10872023-07-12T07:24:13Z Beyond Instrumentalism: Exploring the Affordance Construal of Technology in Heidegger Lagdameo, Federico Jose Current philosophies of technology derived from and inspired by Heidegger’s—exemplified by Postphenomenology and Critical Constructivism—have favored a focus on technological design issues; succumbing consequently; to an instrumental view of technology. This favored focus had contributed to an obliviousness to technology’s inherent dangers which are precisely immune from technological design modifications. Exploring the construal of technology as affordances; this paper offers a contrasting reading of Heidegger’s technology as embedded and embodied dispositions for specific possibilities for being and doing. Consequently; it argues for a more viable alternative to the often-implicit instrumentalist and artefactual view of technologies that frequently undergird prevalent empirical inquiries on how to design technologies and on how to improve our use of technology. Specifically; the paper argues for the employment of an affordance construal to explain technological phenomena. Opposed to instrumentalism; the affordance construal of technology has the advantage of adopting Heidegger’s relational ontology in viewing technology; hereby eschewing the prevalent reductionist view of technologies as artefacts and instruments. In addition; such an account objects to the uncritical and triumphalist reception of any and all technological innovation and invention; typified by many transhumanist/posthumanist positions. 2023-04-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://archium.ateneo.edu/philo-faculty-pubs/88 https://archium.ateneo.edu/context/philo-faculty-pubs/article/1087/viewcontent/lagdameo_april2023.pdf Philosophy Department Faculty Publications Archīum Ateneo Heidegger philosophy of technology affordance theory postphenomenology critical constructivism instrumentalism Arts and Humanities Philosophy
institution Ateneo De Manila University
building Ateneo De Manila University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider Ateneo De Manila University Library
collection archium.Ateneo Institutional Repository
topic Heidegger
philosophy of technology
affordance theory
postphenomenology
critical constructivism
instrumentalism
Arts and Humanities
Philosophy
spellingShingle Heidegger
philosophy of technology
affordance theory
postphenomenology
critical constructivism
instrumentalism
Arts and Humanities
Philosophy
Lagdameo, Federico Jose
Beyond Instrumentalism: Exploring the Affordance Construal of Technology in Heidegger
description Current philosophies of technology derived from and inspired by Heidegger’s—exemplified by Postphenomenology and Critical Constructivism—have favored a focus on technological design issues; succumbing consequently; to an instrumental view of technology. This favored focus had contributed to an obliviousness to technology’s inherent dangers which are precisely immune from technological design modifications. Exploring the construal of technology as affordances; this paper offers a contrasting reading of Heidegger’s technology as embedded and embodied dispositions for specific possibilities for being and doing. Consequently; it argues for a more viable alternative to the often-implicit instrumentalist and artefactual view of technologies that frequently undergird prevalent empirical inquiries on how to design technologies and on how to improve our use of technology. Specifically; the paper argues for the employment of an affordance construal to explain technological phenomena. Opposed to instrumentalism; the affordance construal of technology has the advantage of adopting Heidegger’s relational ontology in viewing technology; hereby eschewing the prevalent reductionist view of technologies as artefacts and instruments. In addition; such an account objects to the uncritical and triumphalist reception of any and all technological innovation and invention; typified by many transhumanist/posthumanist positions.
format text
author Lagdameo, Federico Jose
author_facet Lagdameo, Federico Jose
author_sort Lagdameo, Federico Jose
title Beyond Instrumentalism: Exploring the Affordance Construal of Technology in Heidegger
title_short Beyond Instrumentalism: Exploring the Affordance Construal of Technology in Heidegger
title_full Beyond Instrumentalism: Exploring the Affordance Construal of Technology in Heidegger
title_fullStr Beyond Instrumentalism: Exploring the Affordance Construal of Technology in Heidegger
title_full_unstemmed Beyond Instrumentalism: Exploring the Affordance Construal of Technology in Heidegger
title_sort beyond instrumentalism: exploring the affordance construal of technology in heidegger
publisher Archīum Ateneo
publishDate 2023
url https://archium.ateneo.edu/philo-faculty-pubs/88
https://archium.ateneo.edu/context/philo-faculty-pubs/article/1087/viewcontent/lagdameo_april2023.pdf
_version_ 1772836126877286400