Discursive Construction of Political Categories and Moral Fields: God Versus Rights and Access in a Reproductive Health Legislative Debate

Using a discursive lens, we argue that politicians rhetorically construct categories, storylines, and moral fields. We further claim that such discursive products are action‐oriented toward gaining popular support in a public sphere that is politically fault lined along similar moral orders. As a ca...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Montiel, Cristina Jayme, Umel, Audris, de Leon, Marlene
Format: text
Published: Archīum Ateneo 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://archium.ateneo.edu/psychology-faculty-pubs/3
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/pops.12308
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Ateneo De Manila University
id ph-ateneo-arc.psychology-faculty-pubs-1002
record_format eprints
spelling ph-ateneo-arc.psychology-faculty-pubs-10022020-02-11T05:24:21Z Discursive Construction of Political Categories and Moral Fields: God Versus Rights and Access in a Reproductive Health Legislative Debate Montiel, Cristina Jayme Umel, Audris de Leon, Marlene Using a discursive lens, we argue that politicians rhetorically construct categories, storylines, and moral fields. We further claim that such discursive products are action‐oriented toward gaining popular support in a public sphere that is politically fault lined along similar moral orders. As a case in point, we analyze speeches delivered during congressional voting on a Reproductive Health bill (RH bill). Employing a mixed methods strategy, we first implement a quantitative lexical analysis of frequently used words, followed by a qualitative detection of cohering storylines on both sides of the debate. Results show that oppositionists mark their speeches with a deployment of the word God, while bill supporters use the word access conspicuously. One storyline claims that The RH bill stands against God, while the other purports that The RH bill advocates rights and access. Although both storylines assert moral righteousness, they invoke two different moral orders backed by power blocs and the public at large. The God story appeals to a Catholic discourse and the moral order loudly supported by the politically powerful Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines. The rights/access narrative references a liberal morality frame maintained by social liberals and Philippine President Aquino. We end our paper by introducing the idea of an intrastate discursive lens to analyze moral fields constructed by politicians, oriented toward winning support from the public at large. 2015-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://archium.ateneo.edu/psychology-faculty-pubs/3 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/pops.12308 Psychology Department Faculty Publications Archīum Ateneo discourse analysis rhetoric political categories moral field storyline reproductive health religion text mining Psychology Religion
institution Ateneo De Manila University
building Ateneo De Manila University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider Ateneo De Manila University Library
collection archium.Ateneo Institutional Repository
topic discourse analysis
rhetoric
political categories
moral field
storyline
reproductive health
religion
text mining
Psychology
Religion
spellingShingle discourse analysis
rhetoric
political categories
moral field
storyline
reproductive health
religion
text mining
Psychology
Religion
Montiel, Cristina Jayme
Umel, Audris
de Leon, Marlene
Discursive Construction of Political Categories and Moral Fields: God Versus Rights and Access in a Reproductive Health Legislative Debate
description Using a discursive lens, we argue that politicians rhetorically construct categories, storylines, and moral fields. We further claim that such discursive products are action‐oriented toward gaining popular support in a public sphere that is politically fault lined along similar moral orders. As a case in point, we analyze speeches delivered during congressional voting on a Reproductive Health bill (RH bill). Employing a mixed methods strategy, we first implement a quantitative lexical analysis of frequently used words, followed by a qualitative detection of cohering storylines on both sides of the debate. Results show that oppositionists mark their speeches with a deployment of the word God, while bill supporters use the word access conspicuously. One storyline claims that The RH bill stands against God, while the other purports that The RH bill advocates rights and access. Although both storylines assert moral righteousness, they invoke two different moral orders backed by power blocs and the public at large. The God story appeals to a Catholic discourse and the moral order loudly supported by the politically powerful Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines. The rights/access narrative references a liberal morality frame maintained by social liberals and Philippine President Aquino. We end our paper by introducing the idea of an intrastate discursive lens to analyze moral fields constructed by politicians, oriented toward winning support from the public at large.
format text
author Montiel, Cristina Jayme
Umel, Audris
de Leon, Marlene
author_facet Montiel, Cristina Jayme
Umel, Audris
de Leon, Marlene
author_sort Montiel, Cristina Jayme
title Discursive Construction of Political Categories and Moral Fields: God Versus Rights and Access in a Reproductive Health Legislative Debate
title_short Discursive Construction of Political Categories and Moral Fields: God Versus Rights and Access in a Reproductive Health Legislative Debate
title_full Discursive Construction of Political Categories and Moral Fields: God Versus Rights and Access in a Reproductive Health Legislative Debate
title_fullStr Discursive Construction of Political Categories and Moral Fields: God Versus Rights and Access in a Reproductive Health Legislative Debate
title_full_unstemmed Discursive Construction of Political Categories and Moral Fields: God Versus Rights and Access in a Reproductive Health Legislative Debate
title_sort discursive construction of political categories and moral fields: god versus rights and access in a reproductive health legislative debate
publisher Archīum Ateneo
publishDate 2015
url https://archium.ateneo.edu/psychology-faculty-pubs/3
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/pops.12308
_version_ 1722366476042633216