Puberty Predicts Approach But Not Avoidance on the Iowa Gambling Task in a Multinational Sample

• Main Authors: Icenogle, Grace, Steinberg, Laurence, Olino, Thomas M, Shulman, Elizabeth P, Chein, Jason, Alampay, Liane Peña, Al-Hassan, Suha M, Takash, Hanan M S, Bacchini, Dario, Chang, Lei, Chaudhary, Nandita, Di Giunta, Laura, Dodge, Kenneth A, Fanti, Kostas A, Lansford, Jennifer E, Malone, Patrick S, Oburu, Paul, Pastorelli, Concetta, Skinner, Ann T, Sorbring, Emma, Tapanya, Sombat, Tirado, Liliana Maria Uribe
• Format: text
• Published: Archīum Ateneo 2017
• Subjects: Child Psychology; Developmental Psychology; Psychology
• Online Access: https://archium.ateneo.edu/psychology-faculty-pubs/59; https://archium.ateneo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1058&context=psychology-faculty-pubs
• Institution: Ateneo De Manila University

According to the dual systems model of adolescent risk taking, sensation seeking and impulse control follow different developmental trajectories across adolescence and are governed by two different brain systems. The authors tested whether different underlying processes also drive age differences in reward approach and cost avoidance. Using a modified Iowa Gambling Task in a multinational, cross‐sectional sample of 3,234 adolescents (ages 9–17; M = 12.87, SD = 2.36), pubertal maturation, but not age, predicted reward approach, mediated through higher sensation seeking. In contrast, age, but not pubertal maturation, predicted increased cost avoidance, mediated through greater impulse control. These findings add to evidence that adolescent behavior is best understood as the product of two interacting, but independently developing, brain systems.