Hostile attributional bias and aggressive behavior in global context

We tested a model that children’s tendency to attribute hostile intent to others in response to provocation is a key psychological process that statistically accounts for individual differences in reactive aggressive behavior and that this mechanism contributes to global group differences in childre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dodge, Kenneth A, Malone, Patrick S, Lansford, Jennifer E, Sorbring, Emma, Skinner, Ann T, Tapanya, Sombat, Tirado, Liliana Maria Uribe, Zelli, Arnaldo, Alampay, Liane Peña, Al-Hassan, Suha M, Bacchini, Dario, Bombi, Anna Silvia, Bornstein, Marc H, Chang, Lei, Deater-Deckard, Kirby, Di Giunta, Laura, Oburu, Paul, Pastorelli, Concetta
Format: text
Published: Archīum Ateneo 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://archium.ateneo.edu/psychology-faculty-pubs/155
https://www.pnas.org/content/112/30/9310
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Ateneo De Manila University
id ph-ateneo-arc.psychology-faculty-pubs-1154
record_format eprints
spelling ph-ateneo-arc.psychology-faculty-pubs-11542020-06-27T07:03:09Z Hostile attributional bias and aggressive behavior in global context Dodge, Kenneth A Malone, Patrick S Lansford, Jennifer E Sorbring, Emma Skinner, Ann T Tapanya, Sombat Tirado, Liliana Maria Uribe Zelli, Arnaldo Alampay, Liane Peña Al-Hassan, Suha M Bacchini, Dario Bombi, Anna Silvia Bornstein, Marc H Chang, Lei Deater-Deckard, Kirby Di Giunta, Laura Oburu, Paul Pastorelli, Concetta We tested a model that children’s tendency to attribute hostile intent to others in response to provocation is a key psychological process that statistically accounts for individual differences in reactive aggressive behavior and that this mechanism contributes to global group differences in children’s chronic aggressive behavior problems. Participants were 1,299 children (mean age at year 1 = 8.3 y; 51% girls) from 12 diverse ecological-context groups in nine countries worldwide, followed across 4 y. In year 3, each child was presented with each of 10 hypothetical vignettes depicting an ambiguous provocation toward the child and was asked to attribute the likely intent of the provocateur (coded as benign or hostile) and to predict his or her own behavioral response (coded as nonaggression or reactive aggression). Mothers and children independently rated the child’s chronic aggressive behavior problems in years 2, 3, and 4. In every ecological group, in those situations in which a child attributed hostile intent to a peer, that child was more likely to report that he or she would respond with reactive aggression than in situations when that same child attributed benign intent. Across children, hostile attributional bias scores predicted higher mother- and child-rated chronic aggressive behavior problems, even controlling for prior aggression. Ecological group differences in the tendency for children to attribute hostile intent statistically accounted for a significant portion of group differences in chronic aggressive behavior problems. The findings suggest a psychological mechanism for group differences in aggressive behavior and point to potential interventions to reduce aggressive behavior. 2015-07-13T07:00:00Z text https://archium.ateneo.edu/psychology-faculty-pubs/155 https://www.pnas.org/content/112/30/9310 Psychology Department Faculty Publications Archīum Ateneo aggressive behavior cultural differences hostile attribution interpersonal conflict social cognition Cognition and Perception Cognitive Psychology Psychology
institution Ateneo De Manila University
building Ateneo De Manila University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider Ateneo De Manila University Library
collection archium.Ateneo Institutional Repository
topic aggressive behavior
cultural differences
hostile attribution
interpersonal conflict
social cognition
Cognition and Perception
Cognitive Psychology
Psychology
spellingShingle aggressive behavior
cultural differences
hostile attribution
interpersonal conflict
social cognition
Cognition and Perception
Cognitive Psychology
Psychology
Dodge, Kenneth A
Malone, Patrick S
Lansford, Jennifer E
Sorbring, Emma
Skinner, Ann T
Tapanya, Sombat
Tirado, Liliana Maria Uribe
Zelli, Arnaldo
Alampay, Liane Peña
Al-Hassan, Suha M
Bacchini, Dario
Bombi, Anna Silvia
Bornstein, Marc H
Chang, Lei
Deater-Deckard, Kirby
Di Giunta, Laura
Oburu, Paul
Pastorelli, Concetta
Hostile attributional bias and aggressive behavior in global context
description We tested a model that children’s tendency to attribute hostile intent to others in response to provocation is a key psychological process that statistically accounts for individual differences in reactive aggressive behavior and that this mechanism contributes to global group differences in children’s chronic aggressive behavior problems. Participants were 1,299 children (mean age at year 1 = 8.3 y; 51% girls) from 12 diverse ecological-context groups in nine countries worldwide, followed across 4 y. In year 3, each child was presented with each of 10 hypothetical vignettes depicting an ambiguous provocation toward the child and was asked to attribute the likely intent of the provocateur (coded as benign or hostile) and to predict his or her own behavioral response (coded as nonaggression or reactive aggression). Mothers and children independently rated the child’s chronic aggressive behavior problems in years 2, 3, and 4. In every ecological group, in those situations in which a child attributed hostile intent to a peer, that child was more likely to report that he or she would respond with reactive aggression than in situations when that same child attributed benign intent. Across children, hostile attributional bias scores predicted higher mother- and child-rated chronic aggressive behavior problems, even controlling for prior aggression. Ecological group differences in the tendency for children to attribute hostile intent statistically accounted for a significant portion of group differences in chronic aggressive behavior problems. The findings suggest a psychological mechanism for group differences in aggressive behavior and point to potential interventions to reduce aggressive behavior.
format text
author Dodge, Kenneth A
Malone, Patrick S
Lansford, Jennifer E
Sorbring, Emma
Skinner, Ann T
Tapanya, Sombat
Tirado, Liliana Maria Uribe
Zelli, Arnaldo
Alampay, Liane Peña
Al-Hassan, Suha M
Bacchini, Dario
Bombi, Anna Silvia
Bornstein, Marc H
Chang, Lei
Deater-Deckard, Kirby
Di Giunta, Laura
Oburu, Paul
Pastorelli, Concetta
author_facet Dodge, Kenneth A
Malone, Patrick S
Lansford, Jennifer E
Sorbring, Emma
Skinner, Ann T
Tapanya, Sombat
Tirado, Liliana Maria Uribe
Zelli, Arnaldo
Alampay, Liane Peña
Al-Hassan, Suha M
Bacchini, Dario
Bombi, Anna Silvia
Bornstein, Marc H
Chang, Lei
Deater-Deckard, Kirby
Di Giunta, Laura
Oburu, Paul
Pastorelli, Concetta
author_sort Dodge, Kenneth A
title Hostile attributional bias and aggressive behavior in global context
title_short Hostile attributional bias and aggressive behavior in global context
title_full Hostile attributional bias and aggressive behavior in global context
title_fullStr Hostile attributional bias and aggressive behavior in global context
title_full_unstemmed Hostile attributional bias and aggressive behavior in global context
title_sort hostile attributional bias and aggressive behavior in global context
publisher Archīum Ateneo
publishDate 2015
url https://archium.ateneo.edu/psychology-faculty-pubs/155
https://www.pnas.org/content/112/30/9310
_version_ 1728621347609772032