Letters of Recommendation: An Evolutionary Psychological Perspective
This article develops a theoretical framework for understanding the appeal and tone of letters of recommendation using an evolutionary psychological perspective. Several hypotheses derived from this framework are developed and tested. The authors’ theoretical argument makes two major points. First,...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Published: |
Archīum Ateneo
2002
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://archium.ateneo.edu/psychology-faculty-pubs/198 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0018726702553002 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Ateneo De Manila University |
id |
ph-ateneo-arc.psychology-faculty-pubs-1197 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
ph-ateneo-arc.psychology-faculty-pubs-11972020-07-11T03:37:35Z Letters of Recommendation: An Evolutionary Psychological Perspective Colarelli, Stephen M Hechanova, Ma. Regina Canali, Kristophor G This article develops a theoretical framework for understanding the appeal and tone of letters of recommendation using an evolutionary psychological perspective. Several hypotheses derived from this framework are developed and tested. The authors’ theoretical argument makes two major points. First, over the course of human evolution, people developed a preference for narrative information about people, and the format of letters of recommendation is compatible with that preference. Second, because recommenders are acquaintances of applicants, the tone of letters should reflect the degree to which the relationship with the applicant favors the recommender’s interests. We hypothesized that, over and above an applicant’s objective qualifications, letters of recommendation will reflect cooperative, status and mating interests of recommenders. We used 532 letters of recommendation written for 169 applicants for faculty positions to test our hypotheses. The results indicated that the strength of the cooperative relationship between recommenders and applicants influenced the favorability and length of letters. In addition, male recommenders wrote more favorable letters for female than male applicants, suggesting that male mating interests may influence letter favorability. We conclude with implications for practice and future research. 2002-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://archium.ateneo.edu/psychology-faculty-pubs/198 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0018726702553002 Psychology Department Faculty Publications Archīum Ateneo evolutionary psychology human resource management letters of recommendation Industrial and Organizational Psychology Psychology |
institution |
Ateneo De Manila University |
building |
Ateneo De Manila University Library |
country |
Philippines |
collection |
archium.Ateneo Institutional Repository |
topic |
evolutionary psychology human resource management letters of recommendation Industrial and Organizational Psychology Psychology |
spellingShingle |
evolutionary psychology human resource management letters of recommendation Industrial and Organizational Psychology Psychology Colarelli, Stephen M Hechanova, Ma. Regina Canali, Kristophor G Letters of Recommendation: An Evolutionary Psychological Perspective |
description |
This article develops a theoretical framework for understanding the appeal and tone of letters of recommendation using an evolutionary psychological perspective. Several hypotheses derived from this framework are developed and tested. The authors’ theoretical argument makes two major points. First, over the course of human evolution, people developed a preference for narrative information about people, and the format of letters of recommendation is compatible with that preference. Second, because recommenders are acquaintances of applicants, the tone of letters should reflect the degree to which the relationship with the applicant favors the recommender’s interests. We hypothesized that, over and above an applicant’s objective qualifications, letters of recommendation will reflect cooperative, status and mating interests of recommenders. We used 532 letters of recommendation written for 169 applicants for faculty positions to test our hypotheses. The results indicated that the strength of the cooperative relationship between recommenders and applicants influenced the favorability and length of letters. In addition, male recommenders wrote more favorable letters for female than male applicants, suggesting that male mating interests may influence letter favorability. We conclude with implications for practice and future research. |
format |
text |
author |
Colarelli, Stephen M Hechanova, Ma. Regina Canali, Kristophor G |
author_facet |
Colarelli, Stephen M Hechanova, Ma. Regina Canali, Kristophor G |
author_sort |
Colarelli, Stephen M |
title |
Letters of Recommendation: An Evolutionary Psychological Perspective |
title_short |
Letters of Recommendation: An Evolutionary Psychological Perspective |
title_full |
Letters of Recommendation: An Evolutionary Psychological Perspective |
title_fullStr |
Letters of Recommendation: An Evolutionary Psychological Perspective |
title_full_unstemmed |
Letters of Recommendation: An Evolutionary Psychological Perspective |
title_sort |
letters of recommendation: an evolutionary psychological perspective |
publisher |
Archīum Ateneo |
publishDate |
2002 |
url |
https://archium.ateneo.edu/psychology-faculty-pubs/198 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0018726702553002 |
_version_ |
1681506748838445056 |