One Peace for You, One Peace for Me: Pacification Versus Territorial Rights
Through the world’s colonial history, pacification campaigns established political and economic control by foreign countries over domestic populations struggling for sovereignty. In contemporary post-colonial times, pacification patterns may be reproduced by central governments of new states, to sub...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Published: |
Archīum Ateneo
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://archium.ateneo.edu/psychology-faculty-pubs/324 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-72220-3_12 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Ateneo De Manila University |
id |
ph-ateneo-arc.psychology-faculty-pubs-1322 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
ph-ateneo-arc.psychology-faculty-pubs-13222022-01-27T06:17:13Z One Peace for You, One Peace for Me: Pacification Versus Territorial Rights Montiel, Cristina Jayme Dela Paz, Erwine Through the world’s colonial history, pacification campaigns established political and economic control by foreign countries over domestic populations struggling for sovereignty. In contemporary post-colonial times, pacification patterns may be reproduced by central governments of new states, to subdue marginalized ethnic groups. We first explain pacification by reviewing the US-Filipino colonial era. We then unpack post-colonial pacification in its modern-day form, using as a case in point peace negotiations between Philippine Government and Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF). Analyzing speeches delivered by both sides, we show that the Philippine Government expresses a pacification storyline by calls for disarmament and economic development, while the MILF pushes for territorial sovereignty. In conclusion, we address peace negotiations in the global and domestic arenas. We caution that attending solely to pacification narratives may re-subjugate indigenous peoples, contribute to the breakdown of peace agreements, and bring about new liberation factions which demand territorial sovereignty. 2021-09-21T07:00:00Z text https://archium.ateneo.edu/psychology-faculty-pubs/324 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-72220-3_12 Psychology Department Faculty Publications Archīum Ateneo pacification peace talks social computing positioning theory territorial rights Community Psychology Indigenous Studies Multicultural Psychology Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies |
institution |
Ateneo De Manila University |
building |
Ateneo De Manila University Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Philippines Philippines |
content_provider |
Ateneo De Manila University Library |
collection |
archium.Ateneo Institutional Repository |
topic |
pacification peace talks social computing positioning theory territorial rights Community Psychology Indigenous Studies Multicultural Psychology Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies |
spellingShingle |
pacification peace talks social computing positioning theory territorial rights Community Psychology Indigenous Studies Multicultural Psychology Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies Montiel, Cristina Jayme Dela Paz, Erwine One Peace for You, One Peace for Me: Pacification Versus Territorial Rights |
description |
Through the world’s colonial history, pacification campaigns established political and economic control by foreign countries over domestic populations struggling for sovereignty. In contemporary post-colonial times, pacification patterns may be reproduced by central governments of new states, to subdue marginalized ethnic groups. We first explain pacification by reviewing the US-Filipino colonial era. We then unpack post-colonial pacification in its modern-day form, using as a case in point peace negotiations between Philippine Government and Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF). Analyzing speeches delivered by both sides, we show that the Philippine Government expresses a pacification storyline by calls for disarmament and economic development, while the MILF pushes for territorial sovereignty. In conclusion, we address peace negotiations in the global and domestic arenas. We caution that attending solely to pacification narratives may re-subjugate indigenous peoples, contribute to the breakdown of peace agreements, and bring about new liberation factions which demand territorial sovereignty. |
format |
text |
author |
Montiel, Cristina Jayme Dela Paz, Erwine |
author_facet |
Montiel, Cristina Jayme Dela Paz, Erwine |
author_sort |
Montiel, Cristina Jayme |
title |
One Peace for You, One Peace for Me: Pacification Versus Territorial Rights |
title_short |
One Peace for You, One Peace for Me: Pacification Versus Territorial Rights |
title_full |
One Peace for You, One Peace for Me: Pacification Versus Territorial Rights |
title_fullStr |
One Peace for You, One Peace for Me: Pacification Versus Territorial Rights |
title_full_unstemmed |
One Peace for You, One Peace for Me: Pacification Versus Territorial Rights |
title_sort |
one peace for you, one peace for me: pacification versus territorial rights |
publisher |
Archīum Ateneo |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://archium.ateneo.edu/psychology-faculty-pubs/324 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-72220-3_12 |
_version_ |
1724079152481435648 |