"What does that mean?": The content validity of the ISPCAN Child Abuse Screening Tool - Child version (ICAST-C) in Romania, South Africa, and the Philippines

• Main Authors: Neelakantan, Lakshmi, Fry, Deborah A, Florian, Lani, Silion, Doriana, Filip, Madalina, Thabeng, Mildred, Te, Kathlyn, Sunglao, Jun Angelo, Lu, Mengyao, Ward, Catherine L, Baban, Adriana, Jocson, Rosanne M, Alampay, Liane Peña, Meinck, Franziska
• Format: text
• Published: Archīum Ateneo 2022
• Subjects: Child abuse; Child maltreatment; Cognitive interviews; Content validity; ICAST; Measurement; Psychometrics; Child Psychology; Psychiatry and Psychology; Psychology; Social and Behavioral Sciences
• Online Access: https://archium.ateneo.edu/psychology-faculty-pubs/385; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105869
• Institution: Ateneo De Manila University

Background: The International Society for Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect (ISPCAN) Child Abuse Screening Tool (Children's Version), known as the ICAST-C Version 3, is used widely to assess violence against children, but there is limited psychometric evidence, especially on content validity. Objective: This study aimed to assess the content validity of the ICAST-C with adolescents in Romania, South Africa, and the Philippines. Methods: A purposive sample of adolescents (N = 53, 51 % female) were recruited from urban areas in Romania, the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa, and Metro Manila, Philippines. Semi-structured one-on-one in-depth cognitive interviews sought adolescent perspectives on the relevance, comprehensibility, and comprehensiveness of the ICAST-C. Data were analysed using template analysis. Results: The ICAST-C was broadly perceived to be relevant and comprehensive in measuring violence against children in all study locations. However, there were issues with the comprehensibility of the measure, described at three levels: interpreting items, undertaking coherent elaborations of relevant behaviors and places, and generating a coherent response to the questions. Conclusions: Suggestions to revise the ICAST-C include, among others, adding a practice or how-to section on answering the survey, clarifying the intent of questions, especially on neglect and sexual abuse, emphasizing that questions cover all locations, and asking more positive questions. Pilot studies testing the content validity and cultural appropriateness are needed as a matter of practice in large self-report surveys.