Benchmarking money manager performance : issues and evidence

Academic and practitioner research yields a proliferation of methods using size and value/growth attributes or factors to evaluate portfolio performance. We assess the relative merits of several of the most widely-used procedures, including variants of matched-characteristic benchmark portfolios and...

全面介紹

Saved in:
書目詳細資料
Main Authors: Chan, Louis K. C., Dimmock, Stephen G., Lakonishok, Josef
其他作者: Nanyang Business School
格式: Article
語言:English
出版: 2013
主題:
在線閱讀:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/100242
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/17808
標簽: 添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
機構: Nanyang Technological University
語言: English
實物特徵
總結:Academic and practitioner research yields a proliferation of methods using size and value/growth attributes or factors to evaluate portfolio performance. We assess the relative merits of several of the most widely-used procedures, including variants of matched-characteristic benchmark portfolios and time-series return regressions, by applying them to a sample of active money managers and passive indexes. Estimated abnormal returns display large variation across approaches. The benchmarks most widely used in academic research - attribute-matched portfolios from independent sorts, the conventional three-factor time series model, and cross-sectional regressions of returns on stock characteristics - have poor ability to track returns. Simple alterations are provided that improve the performance of the methods.