Can user choice alter experimental findings in human–computer interaction? : similarity attraction versus cognitive dissonance in social responses to synthetic speech

In this study, the effect of the user choice on social responses to computer-synthesized speech is investigated. Three previous findings about social responses to computer-synthesized speech (i.e., social identification, proximate source orientation, and similarity attraction) were tested using the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lee, Kwan Min, Jung, Younbo, Nass, Clifford
Other Authors: Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/100909
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/18221
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-100909
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1009092020-03-07T12:15:51Z Can user choice alter experimental findings in human–computer interaction? : similarity attraction versus cognitive dissonance in social responses to synthetic speech Lee, Kwan Min Jung, Younbo Nass, Clifford Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information DRNTU::Engineering::Computer science and engineering::Computer applications::Social and behavioral sciences In this study, the effect of the user choice on social responses to computer-synthesized speech is investigated. Three previous findings about social responses to computer-synthesized speech (i.e., social identification, proximate source orientation, and similarity attraction) were tested using the choice paradigm. Social identification and proximate source orientation effects were found even when users had chosen a computer voice at their discretion. In addition, the primacy effect in the user choice prevailed: Participants were more likely to select whatever voice that they heard first between two options. The similarity attraction effect, however, was negated by the cognitive dissonance effect after user choices. The robustness of social responses, its implications for human–computer interaction, and the importance of the user choice in voice-interface designs are discussed. Accepted version 2013-12-12T02:38:48Z 2019-12-06T20:30:28Z 2013-12-12T02:38:48Z 2019-12-06T20:30:28Z 2011 2011 Journal Article Lee, K. M., Jung, Y., & Nass, C. (2011). Can user choice alter experimental findings in human–computer interaction? : similarity attraction versus cognitive dissonance in social responses to synthetic speech. International journal of human-computer interaction, 27(4), 307-322. 1044-7318 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/100909 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/18221 10.1080/10447318.2011.540473 en International journal of human-computer interaction © 2011 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2011.540473 ]. 31 pages application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Engineering::Computer science and engineering::Computer applications::Social and behavioral sciences
spellingShingle DRNTU::Engineering::Computer science and engineering::Computer applications::Social and behavioral sciences
Lee, Kwan Min
Jung, Younbo
Nass, Clifford
Can user choice alter experimental findings in human–computer interaction? : similarity attraction versus cognitive dissonance in social responses to synthetic speech
description In this study, the effect of the user choice on social responses to computer-synthesized speech is investigated. Three previous findings about social responses to computer-synthesized speech (i.e., social identification, proximate source orientation, and similarity attraction) were tested using the choice paradigm. Social identification and proximate source orientation effects were found even when users had chosen a computer voice at their discretion. In addition, the primacy effect in the user choice prevailed: Participants were more likely to select whatever voice that they heard first between two options. The similarity attraction effect, however, was negated by the cognitive dissonance effect after user choices. The robustness of social responses, its implications for human–computer interaction, and the importance of the user choice in voice-interface designs are discussed.
author2 Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
author_facet Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
Lee, Kwan Min
Jung, Younbo
Nass, Clifford
format Article
author Lee, Kwan Min
Jung, Younbo
Nass, Clifford
author_sort Lee, Kwan Min
title Can user choice alter experimental findings in human–computer interaction? : similarity attraction versus cognitive dissonance in social responses to synthetic speech
title_short Can user choice alter experimental findings in human–computer interaction? : similarity attraction versus cognitive dissonance in social responses to synthetic speech
title_full Can user choice alter experimental findings in human–computer interaction? : similarity attraction versus cognitive dissonance in social responses to synthetic speech
title_fullStr Can user choice alter experimental findings in human–computer interaction? : similarity attraction versus cognitive dissonance in social responses to synthetic speech
title_full_unstemmed Can user choice alter experimental findings in human–computer interaction? : similarity attraction versus cognitive dissonance in social responses to synthetic speech
title_sort can user choice alter experimental findings in human–computer interaction? : similarity attraction versus cognitive dissonance in social responses to synthetic speech
publishDate 2013
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/100909
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/18221
_version_ 1681039287177445376