Responsibility to protect : how should Southeast Asia respond?
The emerging doctrine of Responsibility to Protect may have been endorsed by world leaders. But the primary challenge remains how to get it implemented. RtoP may mean different things to different states. There are fundamental issues that have yet to be fully reconciled.
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Nur Azha Putra, Yang Razali Kassim |
---|---|
Other Authors: | S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies |
Format: | Commentary |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2011
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/104669 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/6547 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Responsibility to protect in Southeast Asia and the role of civil society organizations as norm entrepreneurs
by: Tana, Maria Thaemar
Published: (2013) -
US Turn to Protectionism : How Should Asia Respond?
by: Kikuchi, Tomoo, et al.
Published: (2018) -
China's rise and how Taiwan should respond.
by: Ong, Choon Beng.
Published: (2008) -
Feeding Asia: How Should the Region Respond to Production Challenges?
by: Teng, Paul, et al.
Published: (2017) -
UAE nuclear agreement : a model for Southeast Asia?
by: Chew, Alvin
Published: (2011)