Empirical analysis of investors' reaction to individual vs group-written research reports

The objective of this research is to investigate whether investors perceive that research reports written by a team of analysts is of higher quality than those written by an individual analyst. The statistical tests show that investors react more strongly to team-analyst reports than individual-anal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chow, Cheong Yean, Fong, Pak Ho, Loh, Hui Min
Other Authors: Kang Soon Lee, Eugene
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: Nanyang Technological University 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10356/10544
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
Description
Summary:The objective of this research is to investigate whether investors perceive that research reports written by a team of analysts is of higher quality than those written by an individual analyst. The statistical tests show that investors react more strongly to team-analyst reports than individual-analyst reports. Specifically, the abnormal returns on publication of individual-analyst reports are significantly lower than those for team-analyst reports, thus supporting our hypothesis and the behavioural decision-making theory.