A state-space thermal model incorporating humidity and thermal comfort for model predictive control in buildings
A major challenge in applying Model Predictive Control (MPC) to building automation and control (BAC) is the development of a simplified mathematical model of the building for real-time control with fast response times. However, building models are highly complex due to nonlinearities in heat and ma...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/105751 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/48732 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Summary: | A major challenge in applying Model Predictive Control (MPC) to building automation and control (BAC) is the development of a simplified mathematical model of the building for real-time control with fast response times. However, building models are highly complex due to nonlinearities in heat and mass transfer processes of the building itself and the accompanying air-conditioning and mechanical ventilation systems. This paper proposes a method to develop an integrated state-space model (SSM) for indoor air temperature, radiant temperature, humidity and Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) index suitable for fast real-time multiple objectives optimization. Using the model, a multi-objective MPC controller is developed and its performance is evaluated through a case study on the BCA SkyLab test bed facility in Singapore. The runtime of the MPC controller is less than 0.1 s per optimization, which is suitable for real-time BAC applications. Compared to the conventional ON/OFF control, the MPC controller can achieve up to 19.4% energy savings while keeping the PMV index within the acceptable comfort range. When the MPC controller is adjusted to be thermal-comfort-dominant that achieves a neutral PMV index at most office hours, the system can still bring about 6% in energy savings as compared to the conventional ON/OFF control. |
---|