Performance comparison of heat exchangers with different circuitry arrangements for active chilled beam applications

This paper presents a performance comparison study of heat exchangers with different circuitry arrangements for active chilled beam (ACB) applications. Supported by a two-way discharge ACB terminal unit and a performance test pilot plant, four 2-rows plain fin and tube heat exchangers, namely, 1-cir...

وصف كامل

محفوظ في:
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلفون الرئيسيون: Chen, Can, Cai, Wenjian, Wang, Youyi, Lin, Chen
مؤلفون آخرون: School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
التنسيق: مقال
اللغة:English
منشور في: 2014
الموضوعات:
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/105902
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/20952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.04.048
الوسوم: إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
المؤسسة: Nanyang Technological University
اللغة: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-105902
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1059022019-12-06T22:00:25Z Performance comparison of heat exchangers with different circuitry arrangements for active chilled beam applications Chen, Can Cai, Wenjian Wang, Youyi Lin, Chen School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering DRNTU::Engineering::Electrical and electronic engineering::Control and instrumentation This paper presents a performance comparison study of heat exchangers with different circuitry arrangements for active chilled beam (ACB) applications. Supported by a two-way discharge ACB terminal unit and a performance test pilot plant, four 2-rows plain fin and tube heat exchangers, namely, 1-circuit, 2-circuits, 4-circuits, and 8-circuits, are investigated under a wide range of chilled water volume flow rates. The chilled water side thermal and hydraulic characteristics are evaluated. The heat transfer rates are compared under three sets of criteria: identical water volume flow rate, identical pressure drop, and identical pumping energy consumption. Meanwhile, the comparisons are also performed in terms of two non-dimensional parameters: heat exchanger effectiveness and performance index. The study shows that different circuitry arrangements should be preferred in different operation conditions and under different evaluation criteria, while the 2-circuits arrangement is the most comprehensive and reasonable option rather than the 1-circuit one that is widely used in all available ACB products. ASTAR (Agency for Sci., Tech. and Research, S’pore) Accepted version 2014-09-22T09:02:47Z 2019-12-06T22:00:25Z 2014-09-22T09:02:47Z 2019-12-06T22:00:25Z 2014 2014 Journal Article Chen, C., Cai, W., Wang, Y., & Lin, C. (2014). Performance comparison of heat exchangers with different circuitry arrangements for active chilled beam applications. Energy and buildings, 79, 164-172. 0378-7788 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/105902 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/20952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.04.048 en Energy and buildings © 2014 Elsevier. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by Energy and Buildings, Elsevier. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.04.048]. 26 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Engineering::Electrical and electronic engineering::Control and instrumentation
spellingShingle DRNTU::Engineering::Electrical and electronic engineering::Control and instrumentation
Chen, Can
Cai, Wenjian
Wang, Youyi
Lin, Chen
Performance comparison of heat exchangers with different circuitry arrangements for active chilled beam applications
description This paper presents a performance comparison study of heat exchangers with different circuitry arrangements for active chilled beam (ACB) applications. Supported by a two-way discharge ACB terminal unit and a performance test pilot plant, four 2-rows plain fin and tube heat exchangers, namely, 1-circuit, 2-circuits, 4-circuits, and 8-circuits, are investigated under a wide range of chilled water volume flow rates. The chilled water side thermal and hydraulic characteristics are evaluated. The heat transfer rates are compared under three sets of criteria: identical water volume flow rate, identical pressure drop, and identical pumping energy consumption. Meanwhile, the comparisons are also performed in terms of two non-dimensional parameters: heat exchanger effectiveness and performance index. The study shows that different circuitry arrangements should be preferred in different operation conditions and under different evaluation criteria, while the 2-circuits arrangement is the most comprehensive and reasonable option rather than the 1-circuit one that is widely used in all available ACB products.
author2 School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
author_facet School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Chen, Can
Cai, Wenjian
Wang, Youyi
Lin, Chen
format Article
author Chen, Can
Cai, Wenjian
Wang, Youyi
Lin, Chen
author_sort Chen, Can
title Performance comparison of heat exchangers with different circuitry arrangements for active chilled beam applications
title_short Performance comparison of heat exchangers with different circuitry arrangements for active chilled beam applications
title_full Performance comparison of heat exchangers with different circuitry arrangements for active chilled beam applications
title_fullStr Performance comparison of heat exchangers with different circuitry arrangements for active chilled beam applications
title_full_unstemmed Performance comparison of heat exchangers with different circuitry arrangements for active chilled beam applications
title_sort performance comparison of heat exchangers with different circuitry arrangements for active chilled beam applications
publishDate 2014
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/105902
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/20952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.04.048
_version_ 1681035192251187200