Performance comparison of heat exchangers with different circuitry arrangements for active chilled beam applications
This paper presents a performance comparison study of heat exchangers with different circuitry arrangements for active chilled beam (ACB) applications. Supported by a two-way discharge ACB terminal unit and a performance test pilot plant, four 2-rows plain fin and tube heat exchangers, namely, 1-cir...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/105902 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/20952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.04.048 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-105902 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1059022019-12-06T22:00:25Z Performance comparison of heat exchangers with different circuitry arrangements for active chilled beam applications Chen, Can Cai, Wenjian Wang, Youyi Lin, Chen School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering DRNTU::Engineering::Electrical and electronic engineering::Control and instrumentation This paper presents a performance comparison study of heat exchangers with different circuitry arrangements for active chilled beam (ACB) applications. Supported by a two-way discharge ACB terminal unit and a performance test pilot plant, four 2-rows plain fin and tube heat exchangers, namely, 1-circuit, 2-circuits, 4-circuits, and 8-circuits, are investigated under a wide range of chilled water volume flow rates. The chilled water side thermal and hydraulic characteristics are evaluated. The heat transfer rates are compared under three sets of criteria: identical water volume flow rate, identical pressure drop, and identical pumping energy consumption. Meanwhile, the comparisons are also performed in terms of two non-dimensional parameters: heat exchanger effectiveness and performance index. The study shows that different circuitry arrangements should be preferred in different operation conditions and under different evaluation criteria, while the 2-circuits arrangement is the most comprehensive and reasonable option rather than the 1-circuit one that is widely used in all available ACB products. ASTAR (Agency for Sci., Tech. and Research, S’pore) Accepted version 2014-09-22T09:02:47Z 2019-12-06T22:00:25Z 2014-09-22T09:02:47Z 2019-12-06T22:00:25Z 2014 2014 Journal Article Chen, C., Cai, W., Wang, Y., & Lin, C. (2014). Performance comparison of heat exchangers with different circuitry arrangements for active chilled beam applications. Energy and buildings, 79, 164-172. 0378-7788 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/105902 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/20952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.04.048 en Energy and buildings © 2014 Elsevier. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by Energy and Buildings, Elsevier. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.04.048]. 26 p. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
country |
Singapore |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
DRNTU::Engineering::Electrical and electronic engineering::Control and instrumentation |
spellingShingle |
DRNTU::Engineering::Electrical and electronic engineering::Control and instrumentation Chen, Can Cai, Wenjian Wang, Youyi Lin, Chen Performance comparison of heat exchangers with different circuitry arrangements for active chilled beam applications |
description |
This paper presents a performance comparison study of heat exchangers with different circuitry arrangements for active chilled beam (ACB) applications. Supported by a two-way discharge ACB terminal unit and a performance test pilot plant, four 2-rows plain fin and tube heat exchangers, namely, 1-circuit, 2-circuits, 4-circuits, and 8-circuits, are investigated under a wide range of chilled water volume flow rates. The chilled water side thermal and hydraulic characteristics are evaluated. The heat transfer rates are compared under three sets of criteria: identical water volume flow rate, identical pressure drop, and identical pumping energy consumption. Meanwhile, the comparisons are also performed in terms of two non-dimensional parameters: heat exchanger effectiveness and performance index. The study shows that different circuitry arrangements should be preferred in different operation conditions and under different evaluation criteria, while the 2-circuits arrangement is the most comprehensive and reasonable option rather than the 1-circuit one that is widely used in all available ACB products. |
author2 |
School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering |
author_facet |
School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Chen, Can Cai, Wenjian Wang, Youyi Lin, Chen |
format |
Article |
author |
Chen, Can Cai, Wenjian Wang, Youyi Lin, Chen |
author_sort |
Chen, Can |
title |
Performance comparison of heat exchangers with different circuitry arrangements for active chilled beam applications |
title_short |
Performance comparison of heat exchangers with different circuitry arrangements for active chilled beam applications |
title_full |
Performance comparison of heat exchangers with different circuitry arrangements for active chilled beam applications |
title_fullStr |
Performance comparison of heat exchangers with different circuitry arrangements for active chilled beam applications |
title_full_unstemmed |
Performance comparison of heat exchangers with different circuitry arrangements for active chilled beam applications |
title_sort |
performance comparison of heat exchangers with different circuitry arrangements for active chilled beam applications |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/105902 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/20952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.04.048 |
_version_ |
1681035192251187200 |