Urban innovation policy in the postdevelopmental era : lessons from Singapore and Seoul

This article examines the impact of policies for start‐up and entrepreneurship on the developmental model that remains a policy legacy in many Asian countries. The main argument is that the influence of central planning is deeply embedded in the institutions of the Four Asian Tigers, but globalisati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hartley, Kris, Woo, Jun Jie, Chung, Sun Kyo
Other Authors: School of Social Sciences
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/106817
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/49647
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-106817
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1068172020-10-08T08:09:58Z Urban innovation policy in the postdevelopmental era : lessons from Singapore and Seoul Hartley, Kris Woo, Jun Jie Chung, Sun Kyo School of Social Sciences Social sciences::Political science Urban Innovation Policy This article examines the impact of policies for start‐up and entrepreneurship on the developmental model that remains a policy legacy in many Asian countries. The main argument is that the influence of central planning is deeply embedded in the institutions of the Four Asian Tigers, but globalisation and economic liberalisation are disrupting the old developmentalism by incentivising innovation and structural adaptability. In practice, although developmentalism once focused on infrastructure and industrial policy, softer strategies such as attracting educated millennials through urban amenities and creative clustering mimic those of the postindustrial West. Either this trend represents the end of developmentalism or top‐down industrial policy is being rebranded to embrace knowledge and service industries. This article examines this issue at the urban scale, examining policies used by Singapore and Seoul to encourage start‐ups and entrepreneurship in the context of innovation. Government documents are examined and findings compared. Published version 2019-08-15T05:02:05Z 2019-12-06T22:19:00Z 2019-08-15T05:02:05Z 2019-12-06T22:19:00Z 2018 Journal Article Hartley, K., Woo, J. J., & Chung, S. K. (2018). Urban innovation policy in the postdevelopmental era : lessons from Singapore and Seoul. Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, 5(3), 599-614. doi:10.1002/app5.255 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/106817 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/49647 10.1002/app5.255 en Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies © 2018 The Author(s). Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd and Crawford School of Public Policy at The Australian National University. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. 16 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Social sciences::Political science
Urban
Innovation Policy
spellingShingle Social sciences::Political science
Urban
Innovation Policy
Hartley, Kris
Woo, Jun Jie
Chung, Sun Kyo
Urban innovation policy in the postdevelopmental era : lessons from Singapore and Seoul
description This article examines the impact of policies for start‐up and entrepreneurship on the developmental model that remains a policy legacy in many Asian countries. The main argument is that the influence of central planning is deeply embedded in the institutions of the Four Asian Tigers, but globalisation and economic liberalisation are disrupting the old developmentalism by incentivising innovation and structural adaptability. In practice, although developmentalism once focused on infrastructure and industrial policy, softer strategies such as attracting educated millennials through urban amenities and creative clustering mimic those of the postindustrial West. Either this trend represents the end of developmentalism or top‐down industrial policy is being rebranded to embrace knowledge and service industries. This article examines this issue at the urban scale, examining policies used by Singapore and Seoul to encourage start‐ups and entrepreneurship in the context of innovation. Government documents are examined and findings compared.
author2 School of Social Sciences
author_facet School of Social Sciences
Hartley, Kris
Woo, Jun Jie
Chung, Sun Kyo
format Article
author Hartley, Kris
Woo, Jun Jie
Chung, Sun Kyo
author_sort Hartley, Kris
title Urban innovation policy in the postdevelopmental era : lessons from Singapore and Seoul
title_short Urban innovation policy in the postdevelopmental era : lessons from Singapore and Seoul
title_full Urban innovation policy in the postdevelopmental era : lessons from Singapore and Seoul
title_fullStr Urban innovation policy in the postdevelopmental era : lessons from Singapore and Seoul
title_full_unstemmed Urban innovation policy in the postdevelopmental era : lessons from Singapore and Seoul
title_sort urban innovation policy in the postdevelopmental era : lessons from singapore and seoul
publishDate 2019
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/106817
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/49647
_version_ 1681059381045624832