Object individuation and physical reasoning in infancy : an integrative account

Much of the research on object individuation in infancy has used a task in which two different objects emerge in alternation from behind a large screen, which is then removed to reveal either one or two objects. In their seminal work, Xu and Carey (1996) found that it is typically not until the end...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Baillargeon, Renée, Stavans, Maayan, Wu, Di, Gertner, Yael, Setoh, Peipei, Kittredge, Audrey K., Bernard, Amélie
Other Authors: School of Humanities and Social Sciences
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/107285
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/25474
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-107285
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1072852022-02-16T16:29:22Z Object individuation and physical reasoning in infancy : an integrative account Baillargeon, Renée Stavans, Maayan Wu, Di Gertner, Yael Setoh, Peipei Kittredge, Audrey K. Bernard, Amélie School of Humanities and Social Sciences DRNTU::Humanities::Language Much of the research on object individuation in infancy has used a task in which two different objects emerge in alternation from behind a large screen, which is then removed to reveal either one or two objects. In their seminal work, Xu and Carey (1996) found that it is typically not until the end of the first year that infants detect a violation when a single object is revealed. Since then, a large number of investigations have modified the standard task in various ways and found that young infants succeed with some but not with other modifications, yielding a complex and unwieldy picture. In this article, we argue that this confusing picture can be better understood by bringing to bear insights from a related subfield of infancy research, physical reasoning. By considering how infants reason about object information within and across physical events, we can make sense of apparently inconsistent findings from different object-individuation tasks. In turn, object-individuation findings deepen our understanding of how physical reasoning develops in infancy. Integrating the insights from physical-reasoning and object-individuation investigations thus enriches both subfields and brings about a clearer account of how infants represent objects and events. Accepted version 2015-04-30T01:30:38Z 2019-12-06T22:28:05Z 2015-04-30T01:30:38Z 2019-12-06T22:28:05Z 2012 2012 Journal Article Baillargeon, R., Stavans, M., Wu, D., Gertner, Y., Setoh, P., Kittredge, A. K. et al. (2012). Object individuation and physical reasoning in infancy : an integrative account. Language learning and development, 8(1), 4-46. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/107285 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/25474 10.1080/15475441.2012.630610 23204946 184816 en Language learning and development © 2012 Taylor & Francis. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by Language Learning and Development, Taylor & Francis. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [Article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2012.630610]. 44 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Humanities::Language
spellingShingle DRNTU::Humanities::Language
Baillargeon, Renée
Stavans, Maayan
Wu, Di
Gertner, Yael
Setoh, Peipei
Kittredge, Audrey K.
Bernard, Amélie
Object individuation and physical reasoning in infancy : an integrative account
description Much of the research on object individuation in infancy has used a task in which two different objects emerge in alternation from behind a large screen, which is then removed to reveal either one or two objects. In their seminal work, Xu and Carey (1996) found that it is typically not until the end of the first year that infants detect a violation when a single object is revealed. Since then, a large number of investigations have modified the standard task in various ways and found that young infants succeed with some but not with other modifications, yielding a complex and unwieldy picture. In this article, we argue that this confusing picture can be better understood by bringing to bear insights from a related subfield of infancy research, physical reasoning. By considering how infants reason about object information within and across physical events, we can make sense of apparently inconsistent findings from different object-individuation tasks. In turn, object-individuation findings deepen our understanding of how physical reasoning develops in infancy. Integrating the insights from physical-reasoning and object-individuation investigations thus enriches both subfields and brings about a clearer account of how infants represent objects and events.
author2 School of Humanities and Social Sciences
author_facet School of Humanities and Social Sciences
Baillargeon, Renée
Stavans, Maayan
Wu, Di
Gertner, Yael
Setoh, Peipei
Kittredge, Audrey K.
Bernard, Amélie
format Article
author Baillargeon, Renée
Stavans, Maayan
Wu, Di
Gertner, Yael
Setoh, Peipei
Kittredge, Audrey K.
Bernard, Amélie
author_sort Baillargeon, Renée
title Object individuation and physical reasoning in infancy : an integrative account
title_short Object individuation and physical reasoning in infancy : an integrative account
title_full Object individuation and physical reasoning in infancy : an integrative account
title_fullStr Object individuation and physical reasoning in infancy : an integrative account
title_full_unstemmed Object individuation and physical reasoning in infancy : an integrative account
title_sort object individuation and physical reasoning in infancy : an integrative account
publishDate 2015
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/107285
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/25474
_version_ 1725985764932583424