Who and why Twitter users tweet on journal articles : a comparative analysis of readers of medicine and political science journal articles

Ever since its launch, Twitter has continued to attract a large base of technology-savvy users who enjoy the ease and convenience of networking, seeking and sharing information online. Scholars and publishers have come to recognize the potential of Twitter to promote, share and discuss scholarly wor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mohd Ismail Hussein
Other Authors: Na Jin Cheon
Format: Thesis-Master by Coursework
Language:English
Published: Nanyang Technological University 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/136624
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-136624
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1366242020-01-08T02:55:14Z Who and why Twitter users tweet on journal articles : a comparative analysis of readers of medicine and political science journal articles Mohd Ismail Hussein Na Jin Cheon Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information TJCNa@ntu.edu.sg Library and information science::Libraries::Technologies Ever since its launch, Twitter has continued to attract a large base of technology-savvy users who enjoy the ease and convenience of networking, seeking and sharing information online. Scholars and publishers have come to recognize the potential of Twitter to promote, share and discuss scholarly work but have not yet fully understood who tweets about scholarly work and why they tweet about research articles. This study aimed to provide an insight on the type of people who tweet about research work and their motivations for doing so. It compared the profiles and purposes of Twitter users who tweet on medicine and political science articles to understand similarities and differences of tweets on two distinctively different disciplines. Tweets that mention scholarly work are extracted from Altmetric and Twitter. Content analysis and machine learning techniques were then applied to classify the type of Twitter users who originate these tweets, and to classify their motivation to tweet. The results from the study revealed that different disciplines attract different profiles of users. Medicine articles had a stronger appeal to the general public, while political science articles attracted a higher percentage of academics. The study also revealed that different user types have different motivations in using Twitter. Academics and publishers tended to capitalize on Twitter to promote their work, while non-academics mainly shared research work and to a lesser extent, expressed their opinions on the research. Master of Science (Information Studies) 2020-01-08T02:55:14Z 2020-01-08T02:55:14Z 2019 Thesis-Master by Coursework https://hdl.handle.net/10356/136624 en application/pdf Nanyang Technological University
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Library and information science::Libraries::Technologies
spellingShingle Library and information science::Libraries::Technologies
Mohd Ismail Hussein
Who and why Twitter users tweet on journal articles : a comparative analysis of readers of medicine and political science journal articles
description Ever since its launch, Twitter has continued to attract a large base of technology-savvy users who enjoy the ease and convenience of networking, seeking and sharing information online. Scholars and publishers have come to recognize the potential of Twitter to promote, share and discuss scholarly work but have not yet fully understood who tweets about scholarly work and why they tweet about research articles. This study aimed to provide an insight on the type of people who tweet about research work and their motivations for doing so. It compared the profiles and purposes of Twitter users who tweet on medicine and political science articles to understand similarities and differences of tweets on two distinctively different disciplines. Tweets that mention scholarly work are extracted from Altmetric and Twitter. Content analysis and machine learning techniques were then applied to classify the type of Twitter users who originate these tweets, and to classify their motivation to tweet. The results from the study revealed that different disciplines attract different profiles of users. Medicine articles had a stronger appeal to the general public, while political science articles attracted a higher percentage of academics. The study also revealed that different user types have different motivations in using Twitter. Academics and publishers tended to capitalize on Twitter to promote their work, while non-academics mainly shared research work and to a lesser extent, expressed their opinions on the research.
author2 Na Jin Cheon
author_facet Na Jin Cheon
Mohd Ismail Hussein
format Thesis-Master by Coursework
author Mohd Ismail Hussein
author_sort Mohd Ismail Hussein
title Who and why Twitter users tweet on journal articles : a comparative analysis of readers of medicine and political science journal articles
title_short Who and why Twitter users tweet on journal articles : a comparative analysis of readers of medicine and political science journal articles
title_full Who and why Twitter users tweet on journal articles : a comparative analysis of readers of medicine and political science journal articles
title_fullStr Who and why Twitter users tweet on journal articles : a comparative analysis of readers of medicine and political science journal articles
title_full_unstemmed Who and why Twitter users tweet on journal articles : a comparative analysis of readers of medicine and political science journal articles
title_sort who and why twitter users tweet on journal articles : a comparative analysis of readers of medicine and political science journal articles
publisher Nanyang Technological University
publishDate 2020
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/136624
_version_ 1681038402491777024