Like what?

The study comprehensively analyses the interpersonal functions of like, to reflect the attitudes or thoughts of speakers. The subjects of the study were Singaporean Influencers. Their videos that they posted on YouTube, a public video-sharing website were analysed in a multimodal discourse analysis....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tan, Rachel Jiayi
Other Authors: Randy John LaPolla
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: Nanyang Technological University 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/136934
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-136934
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1369342020-06-22T17:10:05Z Like what? Tan, Rachel Jiayi Randy John LaPolla School of Humanities RandyLaPolla@ntu.edu.sg Humanities::General The study comprehensively analyses the interpersonal functions of like, to reflect the attitudes or thoughts of speakers. The subjects of the study were Singaporean Influencers. Their videos that they posted on YouTube, a public video-sharing website were analysed in a multimodal discourse analysis. Like was analysed taking into account its two forms: discourse marker (DM) and quotative like (be+like). Within the study, interpersonal functions in its essence led to inexactness. Like let the hearers know that the influencers do not necessarily mean what they say or used the idea of inexactness to dramatise speech and express attitudes and opinions. In the case of quotative like (be+like), viewers were actively engaged through narrative performances which reflected the attitudes and opinions of the influencers. Events were narrated to be similar but dramatized to capture viewers and develop a greater sense of intimacy from understanding their feelings and values. DM like marked uncertainty, reduced the responsibility of the influencer and acted as a politeness device. In a follow-up frequency analysis, DM like was also found to be used most frequently by the influencers. Bachelor of Arts in Linguistics and Multilingual Studies 2020-02-06T02:57:21Z 2020-02-06T02:57:21Z 2019 Final Year Project (FYP) https://hdl.handle.net/10356/136934 en application/pdf Nanyang Technological University
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Humanities::General
spellingShingle Humanities::General
Tan, Rachel Jiayi
Like what?
description The study comprehensively analyses the interpersonal functions of like, to reflect the attitudes or thoughts of speakers. The subjects of the study were Singaporean Influencers. Their videos that they posted on YouTube, a public video-sharing website were analysed in a multimodal discourse analysis. Like was analysed taking into account its two forms: discourse marker (DM) and quotative like (be+like). Within the study, interpersonal functions in its essence led to inexactness. Like let the hearers know that the influencers do not necessarily mean what they say or used the idea of inexactness to dramatise speech and express attitudes and opinions. In the case of quotative like (be+like), viewers were actively engaged through narrative performances which reflected the attitudes and opinions of the influencers. Events were narrated to be similar but dramatized to capture viewers and develop a greater sense of intimacy from understanding their feelings and values. DM like marked uncertainty, reduced the responsibility of the influencer and acted as a politeness device. In a follow-up frequency analysis, DM like was also found to be used most frequently by the influencers.
author2 Randy John LaPolla
author_facet Randy John LaPolla
Tan, Rachel Jiayi
format Final Year Project
author Tan, Rachel Jiayi
author_sort Tan, Rachel Jiayi
title Like what?
title_short Like what?
title_full Like what?
title_fullStr Like what?
title_full_unstemmed Like what?
title_sort like what?
publisher Nanyang Technological University
publishDate 2020
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/136934
_version_ 1681056433370562560