Nationalizing a ‘Malaysian’ conflict : konfrontasi in Singapore’s history textbooks, 1966-2015
History education is used to promote a sense of nationalism and patriotism among students. In this paper, I analyze how the state’s socio-political agendas have influenced the treatment of the Indonesian Confrontation (1963-1966) in secondary school history textbooks in Singapore. This researc...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Final Year Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nanyang Technological University
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/137447 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Summary: | History education is used to promote a sense of nationalism and patriotism among
students. In this paper, I analyze how the state’s socio-political agendas have influenced the
treatment of the Indonesian Confrontation (1963-1966) in secondary school history
textbooks in Singapore. This research reveals how the state has gradually incorporated the
Indonesian Confrontation as part of its nationalistic narrative in the history education
curriculum during the late 1990s. Before 1999, there was no emphasis on the Indonesian Confrontation in textbooks about Singapore’s history and it continued to be studied only as part of Malaysian history
because the state sought to preserve friendly bilateral relations with Indonesia. After 1999,
state anxieties about declining support for National Service and diplomatic tensions with
Indonesia and Malaysia prompted the state leaders to modify the history syllabus to include
the Indonesian Confrontation in the curriculum. The Indonesian Confrontation was therefore
harnessed as part of the state’s survivalist discourse to remind students that Singapore’s
security cannot be taken for granted. As such this research is an important contribution to
the scholarship as it examines how state hegemony and interstate relations shape the
production of historical knowledge and discursive formations in the history education
curriculum. |
---|