Evolution of protest art in Singapore : examining protest tactics in Brother Cane and Don’t Give Money to the Arts
This paper contributes to our study of art as political discourse through its focus on protest art in Singapore. Its aims are to produce the first definition of the art form and identify how protest art evolved throughout 1990s Singapore. This is achieved through a comparative analysis of two protes...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Final Year Project |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nanyang Technological University
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/138850 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-138850 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1388502020-05-13T06:17:53Z Evolution of protest art in Singapore : examining protest tactics in Brother Cane and Don’t Give Money to the Arts Goh, Wei Hao Walid Jumblatt Bin Abdullah School of Social Sciences walid@ntu.edu.sg Social sciences::Political science::Political institutions::Asia::Singapore Visual arts and music::Art history This paper contributes to our study of art as political discourse through its focus on protest art in Singapore. Its aims are to produce the first definition of the art form and identify how protest art evolved throughout 1990s Singapore. This is achieved through a comparative analysis of two protest artworks, Brother Cane (1994) by Josef Ng and Don’t Give Money to the Arts (1995) by Tang Da Wu, that is split into two sections. First, I established the political and art historical context for our study of the artworks by examining how cultural hegemony is created and maintained in Singapore in the 1990s. I found that the four key hegemony-making apparatuses used by the Singapore government are cultural institutions, physical spaces, public funding and censorship tools. Next, I identified the different tactics used in both artworks, focusing on how Tang managed to escape penalisation for dissenting performance. I argue that Tang’s performance differed in three important ways: the aesthetic techniques used, the site of resistance, and the control of documentation. The methods and findings in this paper present a novel framework for future research on the intersection between politics and the arts in Singapore. Bachelor of Arts in Public Policy and Global Affairs 2020-05-13T06:17:53Z 2020-05-13T06:17:53Z 2020 Final Year Project (FYP) https://hdl.handle.net/10356/138850 en application/pdf Nanyang Technological University |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
country |
Singapore |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Social sciences::Political science::Political institutions::Asia::Singapore Visual arts and music::Art history |
spellingShingle |
Social sciences::Political science::Political institutions::Asia::Singapore Visual arts and music::Art history Goh, Wei Hao Evolution of protest art in Singapore : examining protest tactics in Brother Cane and Don’t Give Money to the Arts |
description |
This paper contributes to our study of art as political discourse through its focus on protest art in Singapore. Its aims are to produce the first definition of the art form and identify how protest art evolved throughout 1990s Singapore. This is achieved through a comparative analysis of two protest artworks, Brother Cane (1994) by Josef Ng and Don’t Give Money to the Arts (1995) by Tang Da Wu, that is split into two sections. First, I established the political and art historical context for our study of the artworks by examining how cultural hegemony is created and maintained in Singapore in the 1990s. I found that the four key hegemony-making apparatuses used by the Singapore government are cultural institutions, physical spaces, public funding and censorship tools. Next, I identified the different tactics used in both artworks, focusing on how Tang managed to escape penalisation for dissenting performance. I argue that Tang’s performance differed in three important ways: the aesthetic techniques used, the site of resistance, and the control of documentation. The methods and findings in this paper present a novel framework for future research on the intersection between politics and the arts in Singapore. |
author2 |
Walid Jumblatt Bin Abdullah |
author_facet |
Walid Jumblatt Bin Abdullah Goh, Wei Hao |
format |
Final Year Project |
author |
Goh, Wei Hao |
author_sort |
Goh, Wei Hao |
title |
Evolution of protest art in Singapore : examining protest tactics in Brother Cane and Don’t Give Money to the Arts |
title_short |
Evolution of protest art in Singapore : examining protest tactics in Brother Cane and Don’t Give Money to the Arts |
title_full |
Evolution of protest art in Singapore : examining protest tactics in Brother Cane and Don’t Give Money to the Arts |
title_fullStr |
Evolution of protest art in Singapore : examining protest tactics in Brother Cane and Don’t Give Money to the Arts |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evolution of protest art in Singapore : examining protest tactics in Brother Cane and Don’t Give Money to the Arts |
title_sort |
evolution of protest art in singapore : examining protest tactics in brother cane and don’t give money to the arts |
publisher |
Nanyang Technological University |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/138850 |
_version_ |
1681056344713461760 |