Evolution of protest art in Singapore : examining protest tactics in Brother Cane and Don’t Give Money to the Arts

This paper contributes to our study of art as political discourse through its focus on protest art in Singapore. Its aims are to produce the first definition of the art form and identify how protest art evolved throughout 1990s Singapore. This is achieved through a comparative analysis of two protes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Goh, Wei Hao
Other Authors: Walid Jumblatt Bin Abdullah
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: Nanyang Technological University 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/138850
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-138850
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1388502020-05-13T06:17:53Z Evolution of protest art in Singapore : examining protest tactics in Brother Cane and Don’t Give Money to the Arts Goh, Wei Hao Walid Jumblatt Bin Abdullah School of Social Sciences walid@ntu.edu.sg Social sciences::Political science::Political institutions::Asia::Singapore Visual arts and music::Art history This paper contributes to our study of art as political discourse through its focus on protest art in Singapore. Its aims are to produce the first definition of the art form and identify how protest art evolved throughout 1990s Singapore. This is achieved through a comparative analysis of two protest artworks, Brother Cane (1994) by Josef Ng and Don’t Give Money to the Arts (1995) by Tang Da Wu, that is split into two sections. First, I established the political and art historical context for our study of the artworks by examining how cultural hegemony is created and maintained in Singapore in the 1990s. I found that the four key hegemony-making apparatuses used by the Singapore government are cultural institutions, physical spaces, public funding and censorship tools. Next, I identified the different tactics used in both artworks, focusing on how Tang managed to escape penalisation for dissenting performance. I argue that Tang’s performance differed in three important ways: the aesthetic techniques used, the site of resistance, and the control of documentation. The methods and findings in this paper present a novel framework for future research on the intersection between politics and the arts in Singapore. Bachelor of Arts in Public Policy and Global Affairs 2020-05-13T06:17:53Z 2020-05-13T06:17:53Z 2020 Final Year Project (FYP) https://hdl.handle.net/10356/138850 en application/pdf Nanyang Technological University
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Social sciences::Political science::Political institutions::Asia::Singapore
Visual arts and music::Art history
spellingShingle Social sciences::Political science::Political institutions::Asia::Singapore
Visual arts and music::Art history
Goh, Wei Hao
Evolution of protest art in Singapore : examining protest tactics in Brother Cane and Don’t Give Money to the Arts
description This paper contributes to our study of art as political discourse through its focus on protest art in Singapore. Its aims are to produce the first definition of the art form and identify how protest art evolved throughout 1990s Singapore. This is achieved through a comparative analysis of two protest artworks, Brother Cane (1994) by Josef Ng and Don’t Give Money to the Arts (1995) by Tang Da Wu, that is split into two sections. First, I established the political and art historical context for our study of the artworks by examining how cultural hegemony is created and maintained in Singapore in the 1990s. I found that the four key hegemony-making apparatuses used by the Singapore government are cultural institutions, physical spaces, public funding and censorship tools. Next, I identified the different tactics used in both artworks, focusing on how Tang managed to escape penalisation for dissenting performance. I argue that Tang’s performance differed in three important ways: the aesthetic techniques used, the site of resistance, and the control of documentation. The methods and findings in this paper present a novel framework for future research on the intersection between politics and the arts in Singapore.
author2 Walid Jumblatt Bin Abdullah
author_facet Walid Jumblatt Bin Abdullah
Goh, Wei Hao
format Final Year Project
author Goh, Wei Hao
author_sort Goh, Wei Hao
title Evolution of protest art in Singapore : examining protest tactics in Brother Cane and Don’t Give Money to the Arts
title_short Evolution of protest art in Singapore : examining protest tactics in Brother Cane and Don’t Give Money to the Arts
title_full Evolution of protest art in Singapore : examining protest tactics in Brother Cane and Don’t Give Money to the Arts
title_fullStr Evolution of protest art in Singapore : examining protest tactics in Brother Cane and Don’t Give Money to the Arts
title_full_unstemmed Evolution of protest art in Singapore : examining protest tactics in Brother Cane and Don’t Give Money to the Arts
title_sort evolution of protest art in singapore : examining protest tactics in brother cane and don’t give money to the arts
publisher Nanyang Technological University
publishDate 2020
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/138850
_version_ 1681056344713461760