Probability of major depression diagnostic classification using semi-structured versus fully structured diagnostic interviews

Background: Different diagnostic interviews are used as reference standards for major depression classification in research. Semi-structured interviews involve clinical judgement, whereas fully structured interviews are completely scripted. The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), a...

全面介紹

Saved in:
書目詳細資料
Main Authors: Levis, Brooke, Benedetti, Andrea, Riehm, Kira E., Saadat, Nazanin, Levis, Alexander W., Azar, Marleine, Rice, Danielle B., Chiovitti, Matthew J., Sanchez, Tatiana A., Cuijpers, Pim, Gilbody, Simon, Ioannidis, John P. A., Kloda, Lorie A., McMillan, Dean, Patten, Scott B., Shrier, Ian, Steele, Russell J., Ziegelstein, Roy C., Akena, Dickens H., Arroll, Bruce, Ayalon, Liat, Baradaran, Hamid R., Baron, Murray, Beraldi, Anna, Bombardier, Charles H., Butterworth, Peter, Carter, Gregory, Chagas, Marcos H., Chan, Juliana C. N., Cholera, Rushina, Chowdhary, Neerja, Clover, Kerrie, Conwell, Yeates, de Man-van Ginkel, Janneke M., Delgadillo, Jaime, Fann, Jesse R, Fischer, Felix H, Fischler, Benjamin, Fung, Daniel, Gelaye, Bizu, Goodyear-Smith, Felicity, Greeno, Catherine G., Hall, Brian J., Hambridge, John, Harrison, Patricia A., Hegerl, Ulrich, Hides, Leanne, Hobfoll, Stevan E., Hudson, Marie, Hyphantis, Thomas, Inagaki, Masatoshi, Ismail, Khalida, Jetté, Nathalie, Khamseh, Mohammad E., Kiely, Kim M., Lamers, Femke, Liu, Shen-Ing, Lotrakul, Manote, Loureiro, Sonia R., Löwe, Bernd, Marsh, Laura, McGuire, Anthony, Mohd Sidik, Sherina, Munhoz, Tiago N., Muramatsu, Kumiko, Osório, Flávia L., Patel, Vikram, Pence, Brian W., Persoons, Philippe, Picardi, Angelo, Rooney, Alasdair G., Santos, Iná S., Shaaban, Juwita, Sidebottom, Abbey, Simning, Adam, Stafford, Lesley, Sung, Sharon, Tan, Lynnette Pei Lin, Turner, Alyna, van der Feltz-Cornelis, Christina M., van Weert, Henk C., Vöhringer, Paul A., White, Jennifer, Whooley, Mary A., Winkley, Kirsty, Yamada, Mitsuhiko, Zhang, Yuying, Thombs, Brett D.
其他作者: Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine)
格式: Article
語言:English
出版: 2020
主題:
在線閱讀:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/140079
標簽: 添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
實物特徵
總結:Background: Different diagnostic interviews are used as reference standards for major depression classification in research. Semi-structured interviews involve clinical judgement, whereas fully structured interviews are completely scripted. The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), a brief fully structured interview, is also sometimes used. It is not known whether interview method is associated with probability of major depression classification. Aims: To evaluate the association between interview method and odds of major depression classification, controlling for depressive symptom scores and participant characteristics. Method: Data collected for an individual participant data meta-analysis of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) diagnostic accuracy were analysed and binomial generalised linear mixed models were fit. Results: A total of 17 158 participants (2287 with major depression) from 57 primary studies were analysed. Among fully structured interviews, odds of major depression were higher for the MINI compared with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) (odds ratio (OR) = 2.10; 95% CI = 1.15–3.87). Compared with semi-structured interviews, fully structured interviews (MINI excluded) were non-significantly more likely to classify participants with low-level depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 scores ≤6) as having major depression (OR = 3.13; 95% CI = 0.98–10.00), similarly likely for moderate-level symptoms (PHQ-9 scores 7–15) (OR = 0.96; 95% CI = 0.56–1.66) and significantly less likely for high-level symptoms (PHQ-9 scores ≥16) (OR = 0.50; 95% CI = 0.26–0.97). Conclusions: The MINI may identify more people as depressed than the CIDI, and semi-structured and fully structured interviews may not be interchangeable methods, but these results should be replicated.