Exploring public perceptions of benefits and risks, trust, and acceptance of nuclear energy in Thailand and Vietnam : a qualitative approach

Understanding public perception is critical to developing effective policies for nuclear energy. This study conducted focus group discussions with the Thai and Vietnamese public to understand their trust in potential stakeholders, benefit perception, risk perception, and acceptance of nuclear energy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ho, Shirley S., Oshita, Tsuyoshi, Looi, Jiemin, Leong, Alisius Deon, Chuah, Agnes Soo Fei
Other Authors: Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/140121
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-140121
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1401212024-03-07T00:26:27Z Exploring public perceptions of benefits and risks, trust, and acceptance of nuclear energy in Thailand and Vietnam : a qualitative approach Ho, Shirley S. Oshita, Tsuyoshi Looi, Jiemin Leong, Alisius Deon Chuah, Agnes Soo Fei Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information Social sciences::Communication Nuclear Energy Public Perception Understanding public perception is critical to developing effective policies for nuclear energy. This study conducted focus group discussions with the Thai and Vietnamese public to understand their trust in potential stakeholders, benefit perception, risk perception, and acceptance of nuclear energy. The participants in both countries preferred economic benefits, such as boosting national development to environmental benefits. Participants perceived nuclear accidents as a major risk, but such perceptions were sometimes based on misunderstandings. The findings suggested that participants evaluated trust toward relevant stakeholders based on their expertise, transparency, and empathy. Overall, participants indicated that their respective countries were not ready for nuclear energy: The Thais thought that their government should heighten public education on nuclear energy, while the Vietnamese thought that their country lacked expertise for managing nuclear power plants. This study also highlights the theoretical and policy implications for nuclear energy development in Southeast Asia. Directions for future studies were discussed. NRF (Natl Research Foundation, S’pore) Accepted version 2020-05-26T08:33:50Z 2020-05-26T08:33:50Z 2018 Journal Article Ho, S. S., Oshita, T., Looi, J., Leong, A. D., & Chuah, A. S. F. (2019). Exploring public perceptions of benefits and risks, trust, and acceptance of nuclear energy in Thailand and Vietnam : a qualitative approach. Energy policy, 127, 259-268. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.011 0301-4215 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/140121 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.011 2-s2.0-85058526277 127 259 268 en Energy Policy © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. This paper was published in Energy Policy and is made available with permission of Elsevier Ltd. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Social sciences::Communication
Nuclear Energy
Public Perception
spellingShingle Social sciences::Communication
Nuclear Energy
Public Perception
Ho, Shirley S.
Oshita, Tsuyoshi
Looi, Jiemin
Leong, Alisius Deon
Chuah, Agnes Soo Fei
Exploring public perceptions of benefits and risks, trust, and acceptance of nuclear energy in Thailand and Vietnam : a qualitative approach
description Understanding public perception is critical to developing effective policies for nuclear energy. This study conducted focus group discussions with the Thai and Vietnamese public to understand their trust in potential stakeholders, benefit perception, risk perception, and acceptance of nuclear energy. The participants in both countries preferred economic benefits, such as boosting national development to environmental benefits. Participants perceived nuclear accidents as a major risk, but such perceptions were sometimes based on misunderstandings. The findings suggested that participants evaluated trust toward relevant stakeholders based on their expertise, transparency, and empathy. Overall, participants indicated that their respective countries were not ready for nuclear energy: The Thais thought that their government should heighten public education on nuclear energy, while the Vietnamese thought that their country lacked expertise for managing nuclear power plants. This study also highlights the theoretical and policy implications for nuclear energy development in Southeast Asia. Directions for future studies were discussed.
author2 Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
author_facet Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
Ho, Shirley S.
Oshita, Tsuyoshi
Looi, Jiemin
Leong, Alisius Deon
Chuah, Agnes Soo Fei
format Article
author Ho, Shirley S.
Oshita, Tsuyoshi
Looi, Jiemin
Leong, Alisius Deon
Chuah, Agnes Soo Fei
author_sort Ho, Shirley S.
title Exploring public perceptions of benefits and risks, trust, and acceptance of nuclear energy in Thailand and Vietnam : a qualitative approach
title_short Exploring public perceptions of benefits and risks, trust, and acceptance of nuclear energy in Thailand and Vietnam : a qualitative approach
title_full Exploring public perceptions of benefits and risks, trust, and acceptance of nuclear energy in Thailand and Vietnam : a qualitative approach
title_fullStr Exploring public perceptions of benefits and risks, trust, and acceptance of nuclear energy in Thailand and Vietnam : a qualitative approach
title_full_unstemmed Exploring public perceptions of benefits and risks, trust, and acceptance of nuclear energy in Thailand and Vietnam : a qualitative approach
title_sort exploring public perceptions of benefits and risks, trust, and acceptance of nuclear energy in thailand and vietnam : a qualitative approach
publishDate 2020
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/140121
_version_ 1794549432179490816