Explicating factual and subjective science knowledge : knowledge as a mediator of news attention and attitudes

Communication scholars have conflicting views on the relationship between exposure to science news and knowledge, and its subsequent influence on attitudes. Such mixed sentiments could arise from the vague definition of knowledge. Therefore, this paper explicates science knowledge into factual knowl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ho, Shirley S., Looi, Jiemin, Leong, Alisius Deon, Leung, Yan Wah
Other Authors: Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/140668
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-140668
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1406682020-06-01T05:17:30Z Explicating factual and subjective science knowledge : knowledge as a mediator of news attention and attitudes Ho, Shirley S. Looi, Jiemin Leong, Alisius Deon Leung, Yan Wah Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information Social sciences::Communication Factual Knowledge Subjective Knowledge Communication scholars have conflicting views on the relationship between exposure to science news and knowledge, and its subsequent influence on attitudes. Such mixed sentiments could arise from the vague definition of knowledge. Therefore, this paper explicates science knowledge into factual knowledge and subjective knowledge. It also compares the mediating roles of both types of knowledge between news attention and public support for science and technology (S&T). A survey of 967 Singaporeans showed that news attention was positively related to both factual and subjective knowledge. The findings revealed a stronger relationship between subjective knowledge and news attention than factual knowledge and news attention. Additionally, factual knowledge was positively related to public support for S&T, but subjective knowledge was negatively related to public support for S&T. The contrasting directions of these associations demonstrate that factual and subjective knowledge are two distinct dimensions of knowledge. Practically, the findings can inform policymakers and communication practitioners about effective public education and engagement initiatives. This study also provided guidelines for newsmakers in news reporting about S&T. MOE (Min. of Education, S’pore) Accepted version 2020-06-01T05:17:30Z 2020-06-01T05:17:30Z 2018 Journal Article Ho, S. S., Looi, J., Leong, A. D., & Leung, Y. W. (2019). Explicating factual and subjective science knowledge : knowledge as a mediator of news attention and attitudes. Asian Journal of Communication, 29(1), 73-91. doi:10.1080/01292986.2018.1518466 0129-2986 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/140668 10.1080/01292986.2018.1518466 2-s2.0-85053248030 1 29 73 91 en Asian Journal of Communication © 2018 AMIC/WKWSCI-NTU. All rights reserved. This paper was published by Taylor & Francis in Asian Journal of Communication and is made available with permission of AMIC/WKWSCI-NTU. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Social sciences::Communication
Factual Knowledge
Subjective Knowledge
spellingShingle Social sciences::Communication
Factual Knowledge
Subjective Knowledge
Ho, Shirley S.
Looi, Jiemin
Leong, Alisius Deon
Leung, Yan Wah
Explicating factual and subjective science knowledge : knowledge as a mediator of news attention and attitudes
description Communication scholars have conflicting views on the relationship between exposure to science news and knowledge, and its subsequent influence on attitudes. Such mixed sentiments could arise from the vague definition of knowledge. Therefore, this paper explicates science knowledge into factual knowledge and subjective knowledge. It also compares the mediating roles of both types of knowledge between news attention and public support for science and technology (S&T). A survey of 967 Singaporeans showed that news attention was positively related to both factual and subjective knowledge. The findings revealed a stronger relationship between subjective knowledge and news attention than factual knowledge and news attention. Additionally, factual knowledge was positively related to public support for S&T, but subjective knowledge was negatively related to public support for S&T. The contrasting directions of these associations demonstrate that factual and subjective knowledge are two distinct dimensions of knowledge. Practically, the findings can inform policymakers and communication practitioners about effective public education and engagement initiatives. This study also provided guidelines for newsmakers in news reporting about S&T.
author2 Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
author_facet Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
Ho, Shirley S.
Looi, Jiemin
Leong, Alisius Deon
Leung, Yan Wah
format Article
author Ho, Shirley S.
Looi, Jiemin
Leong, Alisius Deon
Leung, Yan Wah
author_sort Ho, Shirley S.
title Explicating factual and subjective science knowledge : knowledge as a mediator of news attention and attitudes
title_short Explicating factual and subjective science knowledge : knowledge as a mediator of news attention and attitudes
title_full Explicating factual and subjective science knowledge : knowledge as a mediator of news attention and attitudes
title_fullStr Explicating factual and subjective science knowledge : knowledge as a mediator of news attention and attitudes
title_full_unstemmed Explicating factual and subjective science knowledge : knowledge as a mediator of news attention and attitudes
title_sort explicating factual and subjective science knowledge : knowledge as a mediator of news attention and attitudes
publishDate 2020
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/140668
_version_ 1681057624068456448