On Bootstrap inconsistency and Bonferroni-based size-correction for the subset Anderson-Rubin test under conditional homoskedasticity

We focus on the linear instrumental variable model with two endogenous regressors under conditional homoskedasticity, and study the subset Anderson and Rubin (1949, AR) test when the nuisance structural parameter, the unrestricted slope coefficient of endogenous regressor, may be weakly identified....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wang, Wenjie, Doko Tchatoka, Firmin
Other Authors: School of Social Sciences
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/140714
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-140714
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1407142020-06-01T09:01:54Z On Bootstrap inconsistency and Bonferroni-based size-correction for the subset Anderson-Rubin test under conditional homoskedasticity Wang, Wenjie Doko Tchatoka, Firmin School of Social Sciences Social sciences::Economic development Subvector Inference Linear IV Model We focus on the linear instrumental variable model with two endogenous regressors under conditional homoskedasticity, and study the subset Anderson and Rubin (1949, AR) test when the nuisance structural parameter, the unrestricted slope coefficient of endogenous regressor, may be weakly identified. Weak identification leads to nonstandard null limiting distributions, and alternative to the usual chi-squared critical value is needed. We first investigate the bootstrap validity for the subset AR test based on various plug-in estimators, and show that the bootstrap provides asymptotic refinement when the nuisance structural parameter is strongly identified, but is inconsistent when it is weakly identified. This is in contrast to the result of bootstrap validity in Moreira et al. (2009). Then, we propose a Bonferroni-based size-correction method that yields correct asymptotic size for all the test statistics considered. The power performance of size-corrected tests can be further improved by applying the mapping between structural and endogenous parameters in the model. Monte Carlo experiments confirm the bootstrap inconsistency and demonstrate that all the subset tests based on our correction technique control the size. 2020-06-01T09:01:54Z 2020-06-01T09:01:54Z 2018 Journal Article Wang, W., & Doko Tchatoka, F. (2018). On Bootstrap inconsistency and Bonferroni-based size-correction for the subset Anderson-Rubin test under conditional homoskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 207(1), 188-211. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2018.07.003 0304-4076 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/140714 10.1016/j.jeconom.2018.07.003 2-s2.0-85052730802 1 207 188 211 en Journal of Econometrics © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Social sciences::Economic development
Subvector Inference
Linear IV Model
spellingShingle Social sciences::Economic development
Subvector Inference
Linear IV Model
Wang, Wenjie
Doko Tchatoka, Firmin
On Bootstrap inconsistency and Bonferroni-based size-correction for the subset Anderson-Rubin test under conditional homoskedasticity
description We focus on the linear instrumental variable model with two endogenous regressors under conditional homoskedasticity, and study the subset Anderson and Rubin (1949, AR) test when the nuisance structural parameter, the unrestricted slope coefficient of endogenous regressor, may be weakly identified. Weak identification leads to nonstandard null limiting distributions, and alternative to the usual chi-squared critical value is needed. We first investigate the bootstrap validity for the subset AR test based on various plug-in estimators, and show that the bootstrap provides asymptotic refinement when the nuisance structural parameter is strongly identified, but is inconsistent when it is weakly identified. This is in contrast to the result of bootstrap validity in Moreira et al. (2009). Then, we propose a Bonferroni-based size-correction method that yields correct asymptotic size for all the test statistics considered. The power performance of size-corrected tests can be further improved by applying the mapping between structural and endogenous parameters in the model. Monte Carlo experiments confirm the bootstrap inconsistency and demonstrate that all the subset tests based on our correction technique control the size.
author2 School of Social Sciences
author_facet School of Social Sciences
Wang, Wenjie
Doko Tchatoka, Firmin
format Article
author Wang, Wenjie
Doko Tchatoka, Firmin
author_sort Wang, Wenjie
title On Bootstrap inconsistency and Bonferroni-based size-correction for the subset Anderson-Rubin test under conditional homoskedasticity
title_short On Bootstrap inconsistency and Bonferroni-based size-correction for the subset Anderson-Rubin test under conditional homoskedasticity
title_full On Bootstrap inconsistency and Bonferroni-based size-correction for the subset Anderson-Rubin test under conditional homoskedasticity
title_fullStr On Bootstrap inconsistency and Bonferroni-based size-correction for the subset Anderson-Rubin test under conditional homoskedasticity
title_full_unstemmed On Bootstrap inconsistency and Bonferroni-based size-correction for the subset Anderson-Rubin test under conditional homoskedasticity
title_sort on bootstrap inconsistency and bonferroni-based size-correction for the subset anderson-rubin test under conditional homoskedasticity
publishDate 2020
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/140714
_version_ 1681058685883777024