On Bootstrap inconsistency and Bonferroni-based size-correction for the subset Anderson-Rubin test under conditional homoskedasticity
We focus on the linear instrumental variable model with two endogenous regressors under conditional homoskedasticity, and study the subset Anderson and Rubin (1949, AR) test when the nuisance structural parameter, the unrestricted slope coefficient of endogenous regressor, may be weakly identified....
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/140714 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-140714 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1407142020-06-01T09:01:54Z On Bootstrap inconsistency and Bonferroni-based size-correction for the subset Anderson-Rubin test under conditional homoskedasticity Wang, Wenjie Doko Tchatoka, Firmin School of Social Sciences Social sciences::Economic development Subvector Inference Linear IV Model We focus on the linear instrumental variable model with two endogenous regressors under conditional homoskedasticity, and study the subset Anderson and Rubin (1949, AR) test when the nuisance structural parameter, the unrestricted slope coefficient of endogenous regressor, may be weakly identified. Weak identification leads to nonstandard null limiting distributions, and alternative to the usual chi-squared critical value is needed. We first investigate the bootstrap validity for the subset AR test based on various plug-in estimators, and show that the bootstrap provides asymptotic refinement when the nuisance structural parameter is strongly identified, but is inconsistent when it is weakly identified. This is in contrast to the result of bootstrap validity in Moreira et al. (2009). Then, we propose a Bonferroni-based size-correction method that yields correct asymptotic size for all the test statistics considered. The power performance of size-corrected tests can be further improved by applying the mapping between structural and endogenous parameters in the model. Monte Carlo experiments confirm the bootstrap inconsistency and demonstrate that all the subset tests based on our correction technique control the size. 2020-06-01T09:01:54Z 2020-06-01T09:01:54Z 2018 Journal Article Wang, W., & Doko Tchatoka, F. (2018). On Bootstrap inconsistency and Bonferroni-based size-correction for the subset Anderson-Rubin test under conditional homoskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 207(1), 188-211. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2018.07.003 0304-4076 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/140714 10.1016/j.jeconom.2018.07.003 2-s2.0-85052730802 1 207 188 211 en Journal of Econometrics © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
country |
Singapore |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Social sciences::Economic development Subvector Inference Linear IV Model |
spellingShingle |
Social sciences::Economic development Subvector Inference Linear IV Model Wang, Wenjie Doko Tchatoka, Firmin On Bootstrap inconsistency and Bonferroni-based size-correction for the subset Anderson-Rubin test under conditional homoskedasticity |
description |
We focus on the linear instrumental variable model with two endogenous regressors under conditional homoskedasticity, and study the subset Anderson and Rubin (1949, AR) test when the nuisance structural parameter, the unrestricted slope coefficient of endogenous regressor, may be weakly identified. Weak identification leads to nonstandard null limiting distributions, and alternative to the usual chi-squared critical value is needed. We first investigate the bootstrap validity for the subset AR test based on various plug-in estimators, and show that the bootstrap provides asymptotic refinement when the nuisance structural parameter is strongly identified, but is inconsistent when it is weakly identified. This is in contrast to the result of bootstrap validity in Moreira et al. (2009). Then, we propose a Bonferroni-based size-correction method that yields correct asymptotic size for all the test statistics considered. The power performance of size-corrected tests can be further improved by applying the mapping between structural and endogenous parameters in the model. Monte Carlo experiments confirm the bootstrap inconsistency and demonstrate that all the subset tests based on our correction technique control the size. |
author2 |
School of Social Sciences |
author_facet |
School of Social Sciences Wang, Wenjie Doko Tchatoka, Firmin |
format |
Article |
author |
Wang, Wenjie Doko Tchatoka, Firmin |
author_sort |
Wang, Wenjie |
title |
On Bootstrap inconsistency and Bonferroni-based size-correction for the subset Anderson-Rubin test under conditional homoskedasticity |
title_short |
On Bootstrap inconsistency and Bonferroni-based size-correction for the subset Anderson-Rubin test under conditional homoskedasticity |
title_full |
On Bootstrap inconsistency and Bonferroni-based size-correction for the subset Anderson-Rubin test under conditional homoskedasticity |
title_fullStr |
On Bootstrap inconsistency and Bonferroni-based size-correction for the subset Anderson-Rubin test under conditional homoskedasticity |
title_full_unstemmed |
On Bootstrap inconsistency and Bonferroni-based size-correction for the subset Anderson-Rubin test under conditional homoskedasticity |
title_sort |
on bootstrap inconsistency and bonferroni-based size-correction for the subset anderson-rubin test under conditional homoskedasticity |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/140714 |
_version_ |
1681058685883777024 |