Outcome measurements used in randomized controlled trials of teledermatology : a systematic mapping review

Assessment of the effectiveness of teledermatology has been hampered by the variety of outcome measures used, limiting the possibility for meta-analysis. This systematic mapping review classified the outcome measurement instruments used in randomized controlled trials of teledermatology conducted be...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chow, Aloysius, Soon, Charlene, Smith, Helen Elizabeth, Apfelbacher, Christian
Other Authors: Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/142223
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-142223
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1422232020-11-01T05:10:37Z Outcome measurements used in randomized controlled trials of teledermatology : a systematic mapping review Chow, Aloysius Soon, Charlene Smith, Helen Elizabeth Apfelbacher, Christian Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine) Family Medicine and Primary Care Science::Medicine Outcome Measure Outcomes Research Assessment of the effectiveness of teledermatology has been hampered by the variety of outcome measures used, limiting the possibility for meta-analysis. This systematic mapping review classified the outcome measurement instruments used in randomized controlled trials of teledermatology conducted between 2008 and 2018 using the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials taxonomy. Sixteen articles describing 12 studies were identified. Each trial used a mean of 3.7 outcome measurements (range 2-7) , with a total of 55 different instruments employed. Most instruments mapped on the "skin and subcutaneous tissue outcomes" domain. The most frequently used instrument (Dermatology Life Quality Index) was used in only 3 studies. Over 60% of the instruments used did not cite any evidence of validation. This mapping review provides a list of outcome measurement instruments that can be used as a resource when designing teledermatology trials in the future and provides the foundation for the development of a core outcome set. Published version 2020-06-17T07:58:28Z 2020-06-17T07:58:28Z 2019 Journal Article Chow, A., Soon, C., Smith, H. E., & Apfelbacher, C. (2019). Outcome measurements used in randomized controlled trials of teledermatology : a systematic mapping review. Acta Dermato-Venereologica, 99(13), 1210-1217. doi:10.2340/00015555-3312 0001-5555 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/142223 10.2340/00015555-3312 31502650 2-s2.0-85076585775 13 99 1210 1217 en Acta Dermato-Venereologica © 2019 Acta Dermato-Venereologica. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license. www.medicaljournals.se/acta application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Science::Medicine
Outcome Measure
Outcomes Research
spellingShingle Science::Medicine
Outcome Measure
Outcomes Research
Chow, Aloysius
Soon, Charlene
Smith, Helen Elizabeth
Apfelbacher, Christian
Outcome measurements used in randomized controlled trials of teledermatology : a systematic mapping review
description Assessment of the effectiveness of teledermatology has been hampered by the variety of outcome measures used, limiting the possibility for meta-analysis. This systematic mapping review classified the outcome measurement instruments used in randomized controlled trials of teledermatology conducted between 2008 and 2018 using the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials taxonomy. Sixteen articles describing 12 studies were identified. Each trial used a mean of 3.7 outcome measurements (range 2-7) , with a total of 55 different instruments employed. Most instruments mapped on the "skin and subcutaneous tissue outcomes" domain. The most frequently used instrument (Dermatology Life Quality Index) was used in only 3 studies. Over 60% of the instruments used did not cite any evidence of validation. This mapping review provides a list of outcome measurement instruments that can be used as a resource when designing teledermatology trials in the future and provides the foundation for the development of a core outcome set.
author2 Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine)
author_facet Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine)
Chow, Aloysius
Soon, Charlene
Smith, Helen Elizabeth
Apfelbacher, Christian
format Article
author Chow, Aloysius
Soon, Charlene
Smith, Helen Elizabeth
Apfelbacher, Christian
author_sort Chow, Aloysius
title Outcome measurements used in randomized controlled trials of teledermatology : a systematic mapping review
title_short Outcome measurements used in randomized controlled trials of teledermatology : a systematic mapping review
title_full Outcome measurements used in randomized controlled trials of teledermatology : a systematic mapping review
title_fullStr Outcome measurements used in randomized controlled trials of teledermatology : a systematic mapping review
title_full_unstemmed Outcome measurements used in randomized controlled trials of teledermatology : a systematic mapping review
title_sort outcome measurements used in randomized controlled trials of teledermatology : a systematic mapping review
publishDate 2020
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/142223
_version_ 1683493005736017920