Outcome measurements used in randomized controlled trials of teledermatology : a systematic mapping review
Assessment of the effectiveness of teledermatology has been hampered by the variety of outcome measures used, limiting the possibility for meta-analysis. This systematic mapping review classified the outcome measurement instruments used in randomized controlled trials of teledermatology conducted be...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/142223 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-142223 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1422232020-11-01T05:10:37Z Outcome measurements used in randomized controlled trials of teledermatology : a systematic mapping review Chow, Aloysius Soon, Charlene Smith, Helen Elizabeth Apfelbacher, Christian Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine) Family Medicine and Primary Care Science::Medicine Outcome Measure Outcomes Research Assessment of the effectiveness of teledermatology has been hampered by the variety of outcome measures used, limiting the possibility for meta-analysis. This systematic mapping review classified the outcome measurement instruments used in randomized controlled trials of teledermatology conducted between 2008 and 2018 using the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials taxonomy. Sixteen articles describing 12 studies were identified. Each trial used a mean of 3.7 outcome measurements (range 2-7) , with a total of 55 different instruments employed. Most instruments mapped on the "skin and subcutaneous tissue outcomes" domain. The most frequently used instrument (Dermatology Life Quality Index) was used in only 3 studies. Over 60% of the instruments used did not cite any evidence of validation. This mapping review provides a list of outcome measurement instruments that can be used as a resource when designing teledermatology trials in the future and provides the foundation for the development of a core outcome set. Published version 2020-06-17T07:58:28Z 2020-06-17T07:58:28Z 2019 Journal Article Chow, A., Soon, C., Smith, H. E., & Apfelbacher, C. (2019). Outcome measurements used in randomized controlled trials of teledermatology : a systematic mapping review. Acta Dermato-Venereologica, 99(13), 1210-1217. doi:10.2340/00015555-3312 0001-5555 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/142223 10.2340/00015555-3312 31502650 2-s2.0-85076585775 13 99 1210 1217 en Acta Dermato-Venereologica © 2019 Acta Dermato-Venereologica. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license. www.medicaljournals.se/acta application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Science::Medicine Outcome Measure Outcomes Research |
spellingShingle |
Science::Medicine Outcome Measure Outcomes Research Chow, Aloysius Soon, Charlene Smith, Helen Elizabeth Apfelbacher, Christian Outcome measurements used in randomized controlled trials of teledermatology : a systematic mapping review |
description |
Assessment of the effectiveness of teledermatology has been hampered by the variety of outcome measures used, limiting the possibility for meta-analysis. This systematic mapping review classified the outcome measurement instruments used in randomized controlled trials of teledermatology conducted between 2008 and 2018 using the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials taxonomy. Sixteen articles describing 12 studies were identified. Each trial used a mean of 3.7 outcome measurements (range 2-7) , with a total of 55 different instruments employed. Most instruments mapped on the "skin and subcutaneous tissue outcomes" domain. The most frequently used instrument (Dermatology Life Quality Index) was used in only 3 studies. Over 60% of the instruments used did not cite any evidence of validation. This mapping review provides a list of outcome measurement instruments that can be used as a resource when designing teledermatology trials in the future and provides the foundation for the development of a core outcome set. |
author2 |
Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine) |
author_facet |
Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine) Chow, Aloysius Soon, Charlene Smith, Helen Elizabeth Apfelbacher, Christian |
format |
Article |
author |
Chow, Aloysius Soon, Charlene Smith, Helen Elizabeth Apfelbacher, Christian |
author_sort |
Chow, Aloysius |
title |
Outcome measurements used in randomized controlled trials of teledermatology : a systematic mapping review |
title_short |
Outcome measurements used in randomized controlled trials of teledermatology : a systematic mapping review |
title_full |
Outcome measurements used in randomized controlled trials of teledermatology : a systematic mapping review |
title_fullStr |
Outcome measurements used in randomized controlled trials of teledermatology : a systematic mapping review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Outcome measurements used in randomized controlled trials of teledermatology : a systematic mapping review |
title_sort |
outcome measurements used in randomized controlled trials of teledermatology : a systematic mapping review |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/142223 |
_version_ |
1683493005736017920 |