Review of 3D printable hydrogels and constructs
Three dimensional (3D) bioprinting technologies with appropriate bioinks are potentially able to fabricate artificial tissues or organs with precise control. A bioink is a mixture of biomaterial and living cells, which is a biomaterial for bioprinting. Hydrogels are the most appealing candidates of...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/142404 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-142404 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1424042020-09-26T22:07:54Z Review of 3D printable hydrogels and constructs Li, Huijun Tan, Cavin Li, Lin School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Singapore Centre for 3D Printing Engineering::Mechanical engineering 3D Bioprinting Considerations Three dimensional (3D) bioprinting technologies with appropriate bioinks are potentially able to fabricate artificial tissues or organs with precise control. A bioink is a mixture of biomaterial and living cells, which is a biomaterial for bioprinting. Hydrogels are the most appealing candidates of biomaterials because they have many similar features of the natural extracellular matrix and could also provide a highly hydrated environment for cell proliferation. In this field of bio-fabrication, particularly in bioprinting, the lack of suitable hydrogels remains a major challenge. Thus, choosing appropriate hydrogels for bioprinting is the key to print self-supporting 3D constructs. Most importantly, the considerations regarding the bioinks and the obtained constructs should be made clear. This review aims to provide the specific considerations regarding the important properties of a potential bioink and the generated 3D construct, including rheological, interfacial, structural, biological, and degradation properties, which are crucial for printing of complex and functional 3D structures. Among all of the above considerations, interfacial bonding is one of the important considerations of successfully obtaining a 3D structure. Unfortunately, it is rarely mentioned in the prior literature. This review also points out, for the first time, the characterization of a potential bioink from a rheological point of view. To provide readers with an understanding of the background, the review will first present current technologies for bioprinting and their limitations. Following this will be a summary and discussion of some frequently used hydrogels for bioprinting, and their respective limitations as well. The readers will be informed on the current limitations and achievements in 3D bioprinting. This review ultimately intends to help researchers to select or develop suitable bioinks for successfully bioprinting 3D constructs. Accepted version 2020-06-22T02:36:21Z 2020-06-22T02:36:21Z 2018 Journal Article Li, H., Tan, C., & Li, L. (2018). Review of 3D printable hydrogels and constructs. Materials and Design, 159, 20-38. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2018.08.023 0264-1275 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/142404 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.08.023 2-s2.0-85052479219 159 20 38 en Materials and Design © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. This paper was published in Materials and Design and is made available with permission of Elsevier Ltd. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
country |
Singapore |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Engineering::Mechanical engineering 3D Bioprinting Considerations |
spellingShingle |
Engineering::Mechanical engineering 3D Bioprinting Considerations Li, Huijun Tan, Cavin Li, Lin Review of 3D printable hydrogels and constructs |
description |
Three dimensional (3D) bioprinting technologies with appropriate bioinks are potentially able to fabricate artificial tissues or organs with precise control. A bioink is a mixture of biomaterial and living cells, which is a biomaterial for bioprinting. Hydrogels are the most appealing candidates of biomaterials because they have many similar features of the natural extracellular matrix and could also provide a highly hydrated environment for cell proliferation. In this field of bio-fabrication, particularly in bioprinting, the lack of suitable hydrogels remains a major challenge. Thus, choosing appropriate hydrogels for bioprinting is the key to print self-supporting 3D constructs. Most importantly, the considerations regarding the bioinks and the obtained constructs should be made clear. This review aims to provide the specific considerations regarding the important properties of a potential bioink and the generated 3D construct, including rheological, interfacial, structural, biological, and degradation properties, which are crucial for printing of complex and functional 3D structures. Among all of the above considerations, interfacial bonding is one of the important considerations of successfully obtaining a 3D structure. Unfortunately, it is rarely mentioned in the prior literature. This review also points out, for the first time, the characterization of a potential bioink from a rheological point of view. To provide readers with an understanding of the background, the review will first present current technologies for bioprinting and their limitations. Following this will be a summary and discussion of some frequently used hydrogels for bioprinting, and their respective limitations as well. The readers will be informed on the current limitations and achievements in 3D bioprinting. This review ultimately intends to help researchers to select or develop suitable bioinks for successfully bioprinting 3D constructs. |
author2 |
School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering |
author_facet |
School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Li, Huijun Tan, Cavin Li, Lin |
format |
Article |
author |
Li, Huijun Tan, Cavin Li, Lin |
author_sort |
Li, Huijun |
title |
Review of 3D printable hydrogels and constructs |
title_short |
Review of 3D printable hydrogels and constructs |
title_full |
Review of 3D printable hydrogels and constructs |
title_fullStr |
Review of 3D printable hydrogels and constructs |
title_full_unstemmed |
Review of 3D printable hydrogels and constructs |
title_sort |
review of 3d printable hydrogels and constructs |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/142404 |
_version_ |
1681059267477504000 |