A novel, five-marker alternative to CD16-CD14 gating to identify the three human monocyte subsets

Human primary monocytes are heterogeneous in terms of phenotype and function, but are sub-divided only based on CD16 and CD14 expression. CD16 expression distinguishes a subset of monocytes with highly pro-inflammatory properties from non-CD16 expressing "classical" monocytes. CD14 express...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ong, Siew-Min, Teng, Karen, Newell, Evan, Chen, Hao, Chen, Jinmiao, Loy, Thomas, Yeo, Tsin-Wen, Fink, Katja, Wong, Siew Cheng
Other Authors: School of Biological Sciences
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/142475
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-142475
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1424752023-02-28T17:07:36Z A novel, five-marker alternative to CD16-CD14 gating to identify the three human monocyte subsets Ong, Siew-Min Teng, Karen Newell, Evan Chen, Hao Chen, Jinmiao Loy, Thomas Yeo, Tsin-Wen Fink, Katja Wong, Siew Cheng School of Biological Sciences Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine) Singapore Immunology Network, A∗STAR Science::Biological sciences Monocyte Subsets CD16 Human primary monocytes are heterogeneous in terms of phenotype and function, but are sub-divided only based on CD16 and CD14 expression. CD16 expression distinguishes a subset of monocytes with highly pro-inflammatory properties from non-CD16 expressing "classical" monocytes. CD14 expression further subdivides the CD16+ monocytes into non-classical CD14low and intermediate CD14high subsets. This long-standing CD16-CD14 classification system, however, has limitations as CD14 is expressed in a continuum, leading to subjectivity in delineating the non-classical and intermediate subsets; in addition, CD16 expression is unstable, making identification of the subsets impossible after in vitro culture or during inflammatory conditions in vivo. Hence, we aimed to identify the three monocyte subsets using an alternative combination of markers. Additionally, we wanted to address whether the monocyte subset perturbations observed during infection is real or an artifact of differential CD16 and/or CD14 regulation. Using cytometry by time-of-flight (CyTOF), we studied the simultaneous expression of 34 monocyte markers on total monocytes, and derived a combination of five markers (CD33, CD86, CD64, HLA-DR, and CCR2), that could objectively delineate the three subsets. Using these markers, we could also distinguish CD16+ monocytes from CD16- monocytes after in vitro stimulation. Finally, we found that the observed expansion of intermediate (CD14high) monocytes in dengue virus-infected patients was due to up-regulated CD16 expression on classical monocytes. With our new combination of markers, we can now identify monocyte subsets without CD16 and CD14, and accurately re-examine monocyte subset perturbations in diseases. ASTAR (Agency for Sci., Tech. and Research, S’pore) Published version 2020-06-22T09:18:09Z 2020-06-22T09:18:09Z 2019 Journal Article Ong, S.-M., Teng, K., Newell, E., Chen, H., Chen, J., Loy, T., . . . Wong, S. C. (2019). A novel, five-marker alternative to CD16–CD14 gating to identify the three human monocyte subsets. Frontiers in Immunology, 10, 1761-. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.01761 1664-3224 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/142475 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01761 31402918 2-s2.0-85071282448 10 en Frontiers in Immunology © 2019 Ong, Teng, Newell, Chen, Chen, Loy, Yeo, Fink and Wong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Science::Biological sciences
Monocyte Subsets
CD16
spellingShingle Science::Biological sciences
Monocyte Subsets
CD16
Ong, Siew-Min
Teng, Karen
Newell, Evan
Chen, Hao
Chen, Jinmiao
Loy, Thomas
Yeo, Tsin-Wen
Fink, Katja
Wong, Siew Cheng
A novel, five-marker alternative to CD16-CD14 gating to identify the three human monocyte subsets
description Human primary monocytes are heterogeneous in terms of phenotype and function, but are sub-divided only based on CD16 and CD14 expression. CD16 expression distinguishes a subset of monocytes with highly pro-inflammatory properties from non-CD16 expressing "classical" monocytes. CD14 expression further subdivides the CD16+ monocytes into non-classical CD14low and intermediate CD14high subsets. This long-standing CD16-CD14 classification system, however, has limitations as CD14 is expressed in a continuum, leading to subjectivity in delineating the non-classical and intermediate subsets; in addition, CD16 expression is unstable, making identification of the subsets impossible after in vitro culture or during inflammatory conditions in vivo. Hence, we aimed to identify the three monocyte subsets using an alternative combination of markers. Additionally, we wanted to address whether the monocyte subset perturbations observed during infection is real or an artifact of differential CD16 and/or CD14 regulation. Using cytometry by time-of-flight (CyTOF), we studied the simultaneous expression of 34 monocyte markers on total monocytes, and derived a combination of five markers (CD33, CD86, CD64, HLA-DR, and CCR2), that could objectively delineate the three subsets. Using these markers, we could also distinguish CD16+ monocytes from CD16- monocytes after in vitro stimulation. Finally, we found that the observed expansion of intermediate (CD14high) monocytes in dengue virus-infected patients was due to up-regulated CD16 expression on classical monocytes. With our new combination of markers, we can now identify monocyte subsets without CD16 and CD14, and accurately re-examine monocyte subset perturbations in diseases.
author2 School of Biological Sciences
author_facet School of Biological Sciences
Ong, Siew-Min
Teng, Karen
Newell, Evan
Chen, Hao
Chen, Jinmiao
Loy, Thomas
Yeo, Tsin-Wen
Fink, Katja
Wong, Siew Cheng
format Article
author Ong, Siew-Min
Teng, Karen
Newell, Evan
Chen, Hao
Chen, Jinmiao
Loy, Thomas
Yeo, Tsin-Wen
Fink, Katja
Wong, Siew Cheng
author_sort Ong, Siew-Min
title A novel, five-marker alternative to CD16-CD14 gating to identify the three human monocyte subsets
title_short A novel, five-marker alternative to CD16-CD14 gating to identify the three human monocyte subsets
title_full A novel, five-marker alternative to CD16-CD14 gating to identify the three human monocyte subsets
title_fullStr A novel, five-marker alternative to CD16-CD14 gating to identify the three human monocyte subsets
title_full_unstemmed A novel, five-marker alternative to CD16-CD14 gating to identify the three human monocyte subsets
title_sort novel, five-marker alternative to cd16-cd14 gating to identify the three human monocyte subsets
publishDate 2020
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/142475
_version_ 1759856151441178624