Co-chairing Asia-Pacific defence diplomacy : the case ASEAN Defence Ministers’ Meeting Plus
This article assesses co-chairs’ roles in affecting the outcomes of Asia-Pacific defence diplomacy, which have been under-examined. Attempting to mend this intellectual gap, our study examines: ‘What shapes specific agreement details?’ We contend that co-chairs’ effectiveness is not borne out of res...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/142920 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-142920 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1429202020-11-01T08:06:08Z Co-chairing Asia-Pacific defence diplomacy : the case ASEAN Defence Ministers’ Meeting Plus Pitakdumrongkit, Kaewkamol Klaisringoen, Nantasit S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Social sciences::Political science ADMM-Plus Military Medicine This article assesses co-chairs’ roles in affecting the outcomes of Asia-Pacific defence diplomacy, which have been under-examined. Attempting to mend this intellectual gap, our study examines: ‘What shapes specific agreement details?’ We contend that co-chairs’ effectiveness is not borne out of resource possession but in fact derived from their ability to manage the resources. In order to be effective, co-chairpersons must convert the available resources at hands into bargaining leverage. To validate our argument, empirical analysis of military medicine (MM) collaboration under the ASEAN Defence Ministers’ Meeting Plus (ADMM-Plus) framework was conducted. We demonstrate how the Thai and Russian co-chairs altered the bargaining dynamics to shape the outcomes regarding the ASEAN Center of Military Medicine (ACMM). Insights from our analysis not only extends the existing academic literature on Asia-Pacific defence diplomacy and international negotiation, but also provides practitioners with lessons useful for conducting defence diplomacy and enhancing security cooperation in the Asia-Pacific and beyond. Accepted version 2020-07-09T08:36:55Z 2020-07-09T08:36:55Z 2019 Journal Article Pitakdumrongkit, K., & Klaisringoen, N. (2019). Co-chairing Asia-Pacific defence diplomacy : the case ASEAN Defence Ministers’ Meeting Plus. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 73(1), 64-81. doi:10.1080/10357718.2019.1568387 1035-7718 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/142920 10.1080/10357718.2019.1568387 2-s2.0-85060130850 1 73 64 81 en Australian Journal of International Affairs © 2019 Australian Institute of International Affairs. All rights reserved. This paper was published in Australian Journal of International Affairs and is made available with permission of Australian Institute of International Affairs. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Social sciences::Political science ADMM-Plus Military Medicine |
spellingShingle |
Social sciences::Political science ADMM-Plus Military Medicine Pitakdumrongkit, Kaewkamol Klaisringoen, Nantasit Co-chairing Asia-Pacific defence diplomacy : the case ASEAN Defence Ministers’ Meeting Plus |
description |
This article assesses co-chairs’ roles in affecting the outcomes of Asia-Pacific defence diplomacy, which have been under-examined. Attempting to mend this intellectual gap, our study examines: ‘What shapes specific agreement details?’ We contend that co-chairs’ effectiveness is not borne out of resource possession but in fact derived from their ability to manage the resources. In order to be effective, co-chairpersons must convert the available resources at hands into bargaining leverage. To validate our argument, empirical analysis of military medicine (MM) collaboration under the ASEAN Defence Ministers’ Meeting Plus (ADMM-Plus) framework was conducted. We demonstrate how the Thai and Russian co-chairs altered the bargaining dynamics to shape the outcomes regarding the ASEAN Center of Military Medicine (ACMM). Insights from our analysis not only extends the existing academic literature on Asia-Pacific defence diplomacy and international negotiation, but also provides practitioners with lessons useful for conducting defence diplomacy and enhancing security cooperation in the Asia-Pacific and beyond. |
author2 |
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies |
author_facet |
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Pitakdumrongkit, Kaewkamol Klaisringoen, Nantasit |
format |
Article |
author |
Pitakdumrongkit, Kaewkamol Klaisringoen, Nantasit |
author_sort |
Pitakdumrongkit, Kaewkamol |
title |
Co-chairing Asia-Pacific defence diplomacy : the case ASEAN Defence Ministers’ Meeting Plus |
title_short |
Co-chairing Asia-Pacific defence diplomacy : the case ASEAN Defence Ministers’ Meeting Plus |
title_full |
Co-chairing Asia-Pacific defence diplomacy : the case ASEAN Defence Ministers’ Meeting Plus |
title_fullStr |
Co-chairing Asia-Pacific defence diplomacy : the case ASEAN Defence Ministers’ Meeting Plus |
title_full_unstemmed |
Co-chairing Asia-Pacific defence diplomacy : the case ASEAN Defence Ministers’ Meeting Plus |
title_sort |
co-chairing asia-pacific defence diplomacy : the case asean defence ministers’ meeting plus |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/142920 |
_version_ |
1683494581114503168 |