ASEAN’s evolving institutional strategy : managing great power politics in South China Sea disputes
This article argues that a change in institutional strategy enables The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) to manage its great power relations and prevent their abrupt political intrusion into the region by providing the policy options of pursuing institutional balancing, bandwagoning, h...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/143761 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-143761 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1437612020-09-22T08:09:37Z ASEAN’s evolving institutional strategy : managing great power politics in South China Sea disputes Koga, Kei School of Social Sciences Social sciences ASEAN Institutional Strategy This article argues that a change in institutional strategy enables The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) to manage its great power relations and prevent their abrupt political intrusion into the region by providing the policy options of pursuing institutional balancing, bandwagoning, hedging, or co-option. ASEAN’s strategy is not only to choose optimal policy under a changing security environment, but also to create an institutional division of labour by proliferating ASEAN-led institutions to ensure, as far as possible, regional autonomy and Member States’ security. Changes in ASEAN’s institutional strategy occur when its Member States expect a change in the regional distribution of power. However, due to constraints created by the existing institutional design it is difficult to make any drastic alteration to the institutional strategy unless a radical change in the regional power configuration occurs. This article examines the cases of East Asia Summit and ASEAN Defence Ministers Meeting (ADMM)/ADMM-Plus during the period 2005–2016, the comparison of which illuminates the causes and processes of their strategy change and helps to deepen our understanding of the roles of regional security institutions. Published version 2020-09-22T07:59:44Z 2020-09-22T07:59:44Z 2018 Journal Article Koga, K. (2018). ASEAN’s evolving institutional strategy : managing great power politics in South China Sea disputes. Chinese Journal of International Politics, 11(1), 49–80. doi:10.1093/cjip/pox016 1750-8916 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/143761 10.1093/cjip/pox016 1 11 49 80 en Chinese Journal of International Politics © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Institute of International Relations, Tsinghua University. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
country |
Singapore |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Social sciences ASEAN Institutional Strategy |
spellingShingle |
Social sciences ASEAN Institutional Strategy Koga, Kei ASEAN’s evolving institutional strategy : managing great power politics in South China Sea disputes |
description |
This article argues that a change in institutional strategy enables The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) to manage its great power relations and prevent their abrupt political intrusion into the region by providing the policy options of pursuing institutional balancing, bandwagoning, hedging, or co-option. ASEAN’s strategy is not only to choose optimal policy under a changing security environment, but also to create an institutional division of labour by proliferating ASEAN-led institutions to ensure, as far as possible, regional autonomy and Member States’ security. Changes in ASEAN’s institutional strategy occur when its Member States expect a change in the regional distribution of power. However, due to constraints created by the existing institutional design it is difficult to make any drastic alteration to the institutional strategy unless a radical change in the regional power configuration occurs. This article examines the cases of East Asia Summit and ASEAN Defence Ministers Meeting (ADMM)/ADMM-Plus during the period 2005–2016, the comparison of which illuminates the causes and processes of their strategy change and helps to deepen our understanding of the roles of regional security institutions. |
author2 |
School of Social Sciences |
author_facet |
School of Social Sciences Koga, Kei |
format |
Article |
author |
Koga, Kei |
author_sort |
Koga, Kei |
title |
ASEAN’s evolving institutional strategy : managing great power politics in South China Sea disputes |
title_short |
ASEAN’s evolving institutional strategy : managing great power politics in South China Sea disputes |
title_full |
ASEAN’s evolving institutional strategy : managing great power politics in South China Sea disputes |
title_fullStr |
ASEAN’s evolving institutional strategy : managing great power politics in South China Sea disputes |
title_full_unstemmed |
ASEAN’s evolving institutional strategy : managing great power politics in South China Sea disputes |
title_sort |
asean’s evolving institutional strategy : managing great power politics in south china sea disputes |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/143761 |
_version_ |
1681058899550011392 |