Allocation inequality in cost sharing problem
This paper considers the problem of cost sharing, in which a coalition of agents, each endowed with an input, shares the output cost incurred from the total inputs of the coalition. Two allocations--average cost pricing and the Shapley value--are arguably the two most widely studied solution concept...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/143991 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-143991 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1439912023-05-19T07:31:16Z Allocation inequality in cost sharing problem Chen, Zhi Hu, Zhenyu Tang, Qinshen Nanyang Business School Business::Operations management::Supply chain management Cost Sharing Problem Average Cost Pricing This paper considers the problem of cost sharing, in which a coalition of agents, each endowed with an input, shares the output cost incurred from the total inputs of the coalition. Two allocations--average cost pricing and the Shapley value--are arguably the two most widely studied solution concepts to this problem. It is well known in the literature that the two allocations can be respectively characterized by different sets of axioms and they share many properties that are deemed reasonable. We seek to bridge the two allocations from a different angle--allocation inequality. We use the partial order: Lorenz order (or majorization) to characterize allocation inequality and we derive simple conditions under which one allocation Lorenz dominates (or is majorized by) the other. Examples are given to show that the two allocations are not always comparable by Lorenz order. Our proof, built on solving minimization problems of certain Schur-convex or Schur-concave objective functions over input vectors, may be of independent interest. Nanyang Technological University Accepted version The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the City University of Hong Kong [Start-Up Grant 7200646], the National University of Singapore [Project R-314-000-105-133], and the Nanyang Technological University [Start-Up Grant 020022-00001]. 2020-10-07T01:47:51Z 2020-10-07T01:47:51Z 2020 Journal Article Chen, Z., Hu, Z., & Tang, Q. (2020). Allocation inequality in cost sharing problem. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 91, 111-120. doi:10.1016/j.jmateco.2020.09.006 0304-4068 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/143991 10.1016/j.jmateco.2020.09.006 91 111 120 en Start-Up Grant 020022-00001 Journal of Mathematical Economics © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. This paper was published in Journal of Mathematical Economics and is made available with permission of Elsevier B.V. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Business::Operations management::Supply chain management Cost Sharing Problem Average Cost Pricing |
spellingShingle |
Business::Operations management::Supply chain management Cost Sharing Problem Average Cost Pricing Chen, Zhi Hu, Zhenyu Tang, Qinshen Allocation inequality in cost sharing problem |
description |
This paper considers the problem of cost sharing, in which a coalition of agents, each endowed with an input, shares the output cost incurred from the total inputs of the coalition. Two allocations--average cost pricing and the Shapley value--are arguably the two most widely studied solution concepts to this problem. It is well known in the literature that the two allocations can be respectively characterized by different sets of axioms and they share many properties that are deemed reasonable. We seek to bridge the two allocations from a different angle--allocation inequality. We use the partial order: Lorenz order (or majorization) to characterize allocation inequality and we derive simple conditions under which one allocation Lorenz dominates (or is majorized by) the other. Examples are given to show that the two allocations are not always comparable by Lorenz order. Our proof, built on solving minimization problems of certain Schur-convex or Schur-concave objective functions over input vectors, may be of independent interest. |
author2 |
Nanyang Business School |
author_facet |
Nanyang Business School Chen, Zhi Hu, Zhenyu Tang, Qinshen |
format |
Article |
author |
Chen, Zhi Hu, Zhenyu Tang, Qinshen |
author_sort |
Chen, Zhi |
title |
Allocation inequality in cost sharing problem |
title_short |
Allocation inequality in cost sharing problem |
title_full |
Allocation inequality in cost sharing problem |
title_fullStr |
Allocation inequality in cost sharing problem |
title_full_unstemmed |
Allocation inequality in cost sharing problem |
title_sort |
allocation inequality in cost sharing problem |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/143991 |
_version_ |
1772826491650834432 |