Is there scope for expanding the optometrist's scope of practice in Singapore? - a survey of optometrists, opticians in Singapore
Purpose: In Singapore, optometrists’ roles are limited compared to their counterparts elsewhere. The purpose of the survey is to investigate optometrists’ current roles, views on extended roles, self-reported primary eye care knowledge, needs for continuing professional education (CPE) and views o...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/144269 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
Summary: | Purpose: In Singapore, optometrists’ roles are limited compared to their counterparts elsewhere. The purpose of
the survey is to investigate optometrists’ current roles, views on extended roles, self-reported primary eye care
knowledge, needs for continuing professional education (CPE) and views on suitable modes for CPE.
Methods: Members of the Optometrist and Optician Board (OOB) were invited via email to take part in an
anonymous online survey. The survey questions covered the following areas: current scope of practice, self-rated
primary eye care knowledge, confidence in screening, co-managing minor eye conditions, CPE and referral
behavior.
Results: A total of 230 optometrists completed the survey (response rate 30%). Their current roles were limited
to diagnostic refraction (92%), colour vision assessment (65%), contact lens fitting and dispensing (62%)
amongst others. The average self-rated score for primary eye care knowledge was 8.2 ± 1.4; score range 1-10 (1-
Very poor, 10-Excellent). Self-rated confidence scores for screening for cataract, diabetic retinopathy, chronic
glaucoma and age-related macular degeneration were 2.7 ± 1.5, 3.7 ± 1.9, 4.0 ± 1.9 and 3.8 ± 1.8, respectively. 71% of the optometrists felt that they should undertake regular CPE to improve their primary eye care
knowledge. Blended learning (eLearning and traditional face-to-face lectures) (46.1%) was the most preferred
mode for CPE delivery.
Conclusion: Optometrists in Singapore represent a skilled underutilized primary eye care provider. Though their
self-reported primary eye care knowledge is high, their confidence in screening and co-managing chronic eye
conditions is low. Enabling them for extended primary eye care role would require further training.
Significance: Singapore ageing population has led to greater eye care demands. Task-shifting from ophthalmologists to optometrists has been proposed in the literature to handle this growing care demands. At this
juncture, this study provides evidence based answers to issues revolving around optometrists’ readiness for a role
expansion in Singapore. |
---|