Mencius and Xunzi on Xing (Human Nature)
This article introduces and analyses the debate between Mencius and Xunzi on xing 性 (human nature). While Mencius claims that xing is good, Xunzi claims that xing is bad. A common way of interpreting these two different claims is to determine the scope of xing. It is generally agreed that, for Menci...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/144894 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-144894 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1448942023-03-11T20:05:54Z Mencius and Xunzi on Xing (Human Nature) Sung, Winnie School of Humanities Humanities::Philosophy Human Nature Confucian Ethics This article introduces and analyses the debate between Mencius and Xunzi on xing 性 (human nature). While Mencius claims that xing is good, Xunzi claims that xing is bad. A common way of interpreting these two different claims is to determine the scope of xing. It is generally agreed that, for Mencius, it is the heart/mind that falls within the scope of xing, for Xunzi, the sensory desires. This article also explores a different way of approaching Mencius's and Xunzi's different claims about xing. It is suggested that Mencius's and Xunzi's different views on xing can be understood in terms of their different views on the heart/mind (xin 心). While Mencius thinks that the heart/mind has a morally good natural tendency, Xunzi thinks that the heart/mind has a morally problematic tendency. Accepted version 2020-12-02T07:22:33Z 2020-12-02T07:22:33Z 2016 Journal Article Sung, W. (2016). Mencius and Xunzi on Xing (Human Nature). Philosophy Compass, 11(11), 632–641. doi:10.1111/phc3.12363 1747-9991 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/144894 10.1111/phc3.12363 11 11 632 641 en Philosophy Compass © 2016 The Author(s). Philosophy Compass © 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. All rights reserved. This paper was published in Philosophy Compass and is made available with permission of The Author(s) and Philosophy Compass, John Wiley & Sons Ltd. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Humanities::Philosophy Human Nature Confucian Ethics |
spellingShingle |
Humanities::Philosophy Human Nature Confucian Ethics Sung, Winnie Mencius and Xunzi on Xing (Human Nature) |
description |
This article introduces and analyses the debate between Mencius and Xunzi on xing 性 (human nature). While Mencius claims that xing is good, Xunzi claims that xing is bad. A common way of interpreting these two different claims is to determine the scope of xing. It is generally agreed that, for Mencius, it is the heart/mind that falls within the scope of xing, for Xunzi, the sensory desires. This article also explores a different way of approaching Mencius's and Xunzi's different claims about xing. It is suggested that Mencius's and Xunzi's different views on xing can be understood in terms of their different views on the heart/mind (xin 心). While Mencius thinks that the heart/mind has a morally good natural tendency, Xunzi thinks that the heart/mind has a morally problematic tendency. |
author2 |
School of Humanities |
author_facet |
School of Humanities Sung, Winnie |
format |
Article |
author |
Sung, Winnie |
author_sort |
Sung, Winnie |
title |
Mencius and Xunzi on Xing (Human Nature) |
title_short |
Mencius and Xunzi on Xing (Human Nature) |
title_full |
Mencius and Xunzi on Xing (Human Nature) |
title_fullStr |
Mencius and Xunzi on Xing (Human Nature) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Mencius and Xunzi on Xing (Human Nature) |
title_sort |
mencius and xunzi on xing (human nature) |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/144894 |
_version_ |
1761781333134147584 |