Dynamic fiscal competition with public infrastructure investment : austerity and attracting capital inflow

In a global economy characterised by austerity, regionalisation and bidding for mobile capital, fiscal competition models have a major contribution to make to the economic development debate. With labour proving immobile, even within borderless regions like the European Union, our extension of s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chen, Yang, Huang, Weihong, Rudkin, Simon
Other Authors: School of Social Sciences
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/144933
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-144933
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1449332023-03-05T15:34:36Z Dynamic fiscal competition with public infrastructure investment : austerity and attracting capital inflow Chen, Yang Huang, Weihong Rudkin, Simon School of Social Sciences Social sciences::Economic theory Dynamic Fiscal Competition Infrastructure Investment In a global economy characterised by austerity, regionalisation and bidding for mobile capital, fiscal competition models have a major contribution to make to the economic development debate. With labour proving immobile, even within borderless regions like the European Union, our extension of static models into a dynamic setting offers invaluable advice for policymakers. This paper presents the effects of fiscal competition, considering the inter-temporal interactions among the economic activity of firms, capital taxation and public infrastructure investment in a small-open economy. Four cases emerge, but most interestingly public and private capital being substitutes allows reductions in the net tax burden alongside infrastructure accumulation provided public capital is not too productive. We also review factor complementarity, where subsidies become attractive. Transitional impacts depend on the marginal product of public capital. Hence, from the first case, our model addresses the apparent puzzle of high infrastructure accompanying low taxation, and does so without imposing limitations on competition. Published version We sincerely acknowledge the funding support RDF-13-03-07 and RDF-14-03-19 from Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University. 2020-12-03T07:27:32Z 2020-12-03T07:27:32Z 2018 Journal Article Chen, Y., Huang, W., & Rudkin, S. (2018). Dynamic fiscal competition with public infrastructure investment : austerity and attracting capital inflow. Theoretical Economics Letters, 8(11), 2460-2478. doi:10.4236/tel.2018.811159 2162-2078 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/144933 10.4236/tel.2018.811159 11 8 2460 2478 en Theoretical Economics Letters © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Social sciences::Economic theory
Dynamic Fiscal Competition
Infrastructure Investment
spellingShingle Social sciences::Economic theory
Dynamic Fiscal Competition
Infrastructure Investment
Chen, Yang
Huang, Weihong
Rudkin, Simon
Dynamic fiscal competition with public infrastructure investment : austerity and attracting capital inflow
description In a global economy characterised by austerity, regionalisation and bidding for mobile capital, fiscal competition models have a major contribution to make to the economic development debate. With labour proving immobile, even within borderless regions like the European Union, our extension of static models into a dynamic setting offers invaluable advice for policymakers. This paper presents the effects of fiscal competition, considering the inter-temporal interactions among the economic activity of firms, capital taxation and public infrastructure investment in a small-open economy. Four cases emerge, but most interestingly public and private capital being substitutes allows reductions in the net tax burden alongside infrastructure accumulation provided public capital is not too productive. We also review factor complementarity, where subsidies become attractive. Transitional impacts depend on the marginal product of public capital. Hence, from the first case, our model addresses the apparent puzzle of high infrastructure accompanying low taxation, and does so without imposing limitations on competition.
author2 School of Social Sciences
author_facet School of Social Sciences
Chen, Yang
Huang, Weihong
Rudkin, Simon
format Article
author Chen, Yang
Huang, Weihong
Rudkin, Simon
author_sort Chen, Yang
title Dynamic fiscal competition with public infrastructure investment : austerity and attracting capital inflow
title_short Dynamic fiscal competition with public infrastructure investment : austerity and attracting capital inflow
title_full Dynamic fiscal competition with public infrastructure investment : austerity and attracting capital inflow
title_fullStr Dynamic fiscal competition with public infrastructure investment : austerity and attracting capital inflow
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic fiscal competition with public infrastructure investment : austerity and attracting capital inflow
title_sort dynamic fiscal competition with public infrastructure investment : austerity and attracting capital inflow
publishDate 2020
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/144933
_version_ 1759857517596246016