Dynamic fiscal competition with public infrastructure investment : austerity and attracting capital inflow
In a global economy characterised by austerity, regionalisation and bidding for mobile capital, fiscal competition models have a major contribution to make to the economic development debate. With labour proving immobile, even within borderless regions like the European Union, our extension of s...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/144933 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-144933 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1449332023-03-05T15:34:36Z Dynamic fiscal competition with public infrastructure investment : austerity and attracting capital inflow Chen, Yang Huang, Weihong Rudkin, Simon School of Social Sciences Social sciences::Economic theory Dynamic Fiscal Competition Infrastructure Investment In a global economy characterised by austerity, regionalisation and bidding for mobile capital, fiscal competition models have a major contribution to make to the economic development debate. With labour proving immobile, even within borderless regions like the European Union, our extension of static models into a dynamic setting offers invaluable advice for policymakers. This paper presents the effects of fiscal competition, considering the inter-temporal interactions among the economic activity of firms, capital taxation and public infrastructure investment in a small-open economy. Four cases emerge, but most interestingly public and private capital being substitutes allows reductions in the net tax burden alongside infrastructure accumulation provided public capital is not too productive. We also review factor complementarity, where subsidies become attractive. Transitional impacts depend on the marginal product of public capital. Hence, from the first case, our model addresses the apparent puzzle of high infrastructure accompanying low taxation, and does so without imposing limitations on competition. Published version We sincerely acknowledge the funding support RDF-13-03-07 and RDF-14-03-19 from Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University. 2020-12-03T07:27:32Z 2020-12-03T07:27:32Z 2018 Journal Article Chen, Y., Huang, W., & Rudkin, S. (2018). Dynamic fiscal competition with public infrastructure investment : austerity and attracting capital inflow. Theoretical Economics Letters, 8(11), 2460-2478. doi:10.4236/tel.2018.811159 2162-2078 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/144933 10.4236/tel.2018.811159 11 8 2460 2478 en Theoretical Economics Letters © 2018 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Social sciences::Economic theory Dynamic Fiscal Competition Infrastructure Investment |
spellingShingle |
Social sciences::Economic theory Dynamic Fiscal Competition Infrastructure Investment Chen, Yang Huang, Weihong Rudkin, Simon Dynamic fiscal competition with public infrastructure investment : austerity and attracting capital inflow |
description |
In a global economy characterised by austerity, regionalisation and bidding
for mobile capital, fiscal competition models have a major contribution to
make to the economic development debate. With labour proving immobile,
even within borderless regions like the European Union, our extension of
static models into a dynamic setting offers invaluable advice for policymakers. This paper presents the effects of fiscal competition, considering the inter-temporal interactions among the economic activity of firms, capital taxation and public infrastructure investment in a small-open economy. Four
cases emerge, but most interestingly public and private capital being substitutes allows reductions in the net tax burden alongside infrastructure accumulation provided public capital is not too productive. We also review factor
complementarity, where subsidies become attractive. Transitional impacts
depend on the marginal product of public capital. Hence, from the first case,
our model addresses the apparent puzzle of high infrastructure accompanying low taxation, and does so without imposing limitations on competition. |
author2 |
School of Social Sciences |
author_facet |
School of Social Sciences Chen, Yang Huang, Weihong Rudkin, Simon |
format |
Article |
author |
Chen, Yang Huang, Weihong Rudkin, Simon |
author_sort |
Chen, Yang |
title |
Dynamic fiscal competition with public infrastructure investment : austerity and attracting capital inflow |
title_short |
Dynamic fiscal competition with public infrastructure investment : austerity and attracting capital inflow |
title_full |
Dynamic fiscal competition with public infrastructure investment : austerity and attracting capital inflow |
title_fullStr |
Dynamic fiscal competition with public infrastructure investment : austerity and attracting capital inflow |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dynamic fiscal competition with public infrastructure investment : austerity and attracting capital inflow |
title_sort |
dynamic fiscal competition with public infrastructure investment : austerity and attracting capital inflow |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/144933 |
_version_ |
1759857517596246016 |