Selective immigration policies as screening devices and the immigrant–native educational achievement gap

The literature on the immigrant–native educational achievement gap is suggestive of a better performance of immigrant students in countries practising selective immigration policies. However, the origin of such differences has not been investigated. I considered both important observed characteristi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sakellariou, Christos
Other Authors: School of Social Sciences
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/145699
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-145699
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1456992023-03-05T15:33:56Z Selective immigration policies as screening devices and the immigrant–native educational achievement gap Sakellariou, Christos School of Social Sciences Social sciences::Economic development Educational Achievement Gap Selective Immigration Policies The literature on the immigrant–native educational achievement gap is suggestive of a better performance of immigrant students in countries practising selective immigration policies. However, the origin of such differences has not been investigated. I considered both important observed characteristics as well as the role of unobservables in the formation of immigrant–native achievement differences in 4 selective immigration countries. I found that, if the comparison is between selective immigration countries as a group and other European/Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries, immigrant students in selective immigration countries perform better. However, the results are heterogeneous and different conclusions apply to each of the 4 countries. The findings are discussed in the context of successful immigration policies as screening devices, which induce a self-selection of immigrants with transferable and adaptive skills. Potentially important are also institutional differences with respect to how inclusionary and conducive to the integration of immigrants into the host country policies are. Accepted version 2021-01-05T04:49:27Z 2021-01-05T04:49:27Z 2018 Journal Article Sakellariou, C. (2018). Selective immigration policies as screening devices and the immigrant–native educational achievement gap. Educational Research and Evaluation, 24(6-7), 394-416. doi:10.1080/13803611.2018.1549998 1380-3611 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/145699 10.1080/13803611.2018.1549998 6-7 24 394 416 en Educational Research and Evaluation This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor and Francis in Educational Research and Evaluation on 26 Dec 2018, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/13803611.2018.1549998. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Social sciences::Economic development
Educational Achievement Gap
Selective Immigration Policies
spellingShingle Social sciences::Economic development
Educational Achievement Gap
Selective Immigration Policies
Sakellariou, Christos
Selective immigration policies as screening devices and the immigrant–native educational achievement gap
description The literature on the immigrant–native educational achievement gap is suggestive of a better performance of immigrant students in countries practising selective immigration policies. However, the origin of such differences has not been investigated. I considered both important observed characteristics as well as the role of unobservables in the formation of immigrant–native achievement differences in 4 selective immigration countries. I found that, if the comparison is between selective immigration countries as a group and other European/Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries, immigrant students in selective immigration countries perform better. However, the results are heterogeneous and different conclusions apply to each of the 4 countries. The findings are discussed in the context of successful immigration policies as screening devices, which induce a self-selection of immigrants with transferable and adaptive skills. Potentially important are also institutional differences with respect to how inclusionary and conducive to the integration of immigrants into the host country policies are.
author2 School of Social Sciences
author_facet School of Social Sciences
Sakellariou, Christos
format Article
author Sakellariou, Christos
author_sort Sakellariou, Christos
title Selective immigration policies as screening devices and the immigrant–native educational achievement gap
title_short Selective immigration policies as screening devices and the immigrant–native educational achievement gap
title_full Selective immigration policies as screening devices and the immigrant–native educational achievement gap
title_fullStr Selective immigration policies as screening devices and the immigrant–native educational achievement gap
title_full_unstemmed Selective immigration policies as screening devices and the immigrant–native educational achievement gap
title_sort selective immigration policies as screening devices and the immigrant–native educational achievement gap
publishDate 2021
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/145699
_version_ 1759856844080152576