Comparing the effect of Mn substitution in sulfide and sulfoselenide‐based kesterite solar cells
Cation substitution is one of the effective ways to improve Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 (CZTSSe) photovoltaic performance. However, the commonly reported substitutes, Ag and Cd, are not ideal as they detract from the earth‐abundant and nontoxic motivation of CZTSSe. Herein, the role of Mn substitution in sulfide...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/145743 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-145743 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1457432023-07-14T16:02:07Z Comparing the effect of Mn substitution in sulfide and sulfoselenide‐based kesterite solar cells Lie, Stener Li, Wenjie Leow, Shin Woei Bishop, Douglas M. Gunawan, Oki Wong, Lydia Helena School of Materials Science and Engineering Engineering::Materials::Energy materials Cation Substitution Thin Films Cation substitution is one of the effective ways to improve Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 (CZTSSe) photovoltaic performance. However, the commonly reported substitutes, Ag and Cd, are not ideal as they detract from the earth‐abundant and nontoxic motivation of CZTSSe. Herein, the role of Mn substitution in sulfide and sulfoselenide films are compared in terms of optoelectronic properties and device performance. CZT(S,Se) + CMZT(S,Se) double‐layered structures are fabricated by a sol–gel spin‐coating method with variations in the CMZT(S,Se) layer thickness. It is found that a smaller amount of Mn is required to achieve the highest photovoltaic performance in sulfoselenide films in comparison with sulfide‐based films. All device parameters (particularly Voc and fill factor) of the sulfoselenide films are improved as compared with the sulfide system. Using a combination of capacitance–voltage, drive‐level capacitance profiling, and photoluminescence (PL), it is found that the sulfoselenide film has a smaller interface defect density and higher hole mobility and PL intensity, which suggest much more effective charge separation and transport. In contrast, in double‐layer sulfide films, Mn reduces the acceptor defect level of the absorber. Ministry of Education (MOE) National Research Foundation (NRF) Accepted version This research is partially supported by grants from the National Research Foundation, Prime Minister’s Office, Singapore under its Campus of Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE) programme and Ministry of Education (MOE) Tier 2 Project (MOE2016-T2-1-030). 2021-01-06T09:00:45Z 2021-01-06T09:00:45Z 2020 Journal Article Lie, S., Li, W., Leow, S. W., Bishop, D. M., Gunawan, O., & Wong, L. H. (2020). Comparing the effect of Mn substitution in sulfide and sulfoselenide‐based kesterite solar cells. Solar RRL, 4(4), 1900521-. doi:10.1002/solr.201900521 2367-198X https://hdl.handle.net/10356/145743 10.1002/solr.201900521 4 4 1900521 en Solar RRL 10.21979/N9/23P0WU This is the accepted version of the following article: Lie, S., Li, W., Leow, S. W., Bishop, D. M., Gunawan, O., & Wong, L. H. (2020). Comparing the effect of Mn substitution in sulfide and sulfoselenide‐based kesterite solar cells. Solar RRL, 4(4), 1900521-. doi:10.1002/solr.201900521, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/solr.201900521. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with the Wiley Self-Archiving Policy [https://authorservices.wiley.com/authorresources/Journal-Authors/licensing/self-archiving.html]. application/pdf application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Engineering::Materials::Energy materials Cation Substitution Thin Films |
spellingShingle |
Engineering::Materials::Energy materials Cation Substitution Thin Films Lie, Stener Li, Wenjie Leow, Shin Woei Bishop, Douglas M. Gunawan, Oki Wong, Lydia Helena Comparing the effect of Mn substitution in sulfide and sulfoselenide‐based kesterite solar cells |
description |
Cation substitution is one of the effective ways to improve Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 (CZTSSe) photovoltaic performance. However, the commonly reported substitutes, Ag and Cd, are not ideal as they detract from the earth‐abundant and nontoxic motivation of CZTSSe. Herein, the role of Mn substitution in sulfide and sulfoselenide films are compared in terms of optoelectronic properties and device performance. CZT(S,Se) + CMZT(S,Se) double‐layered structures are fabricated by a sol–gel spin‐coating method with variations in the CMZT(S,Se) layer thickness. It is found that a smaller amount of Mn is required to achieve the highest photovoltaic performance in sulfoselenide films in comparison with sulfide‐based films. All device parameters (particularly Voc and fill factor) of the sulfoselenide films are improved as compared with the sulfide system. Using a combination of capacitance–voltage, drive‐level capacitance profiling, and photoluminescence (PL), it is found that the sulfoselenide film has a smaller interface defect density and higher hole mobility and PL intensity, which suggest much more effective charge separation and transport. In contrast, in double‐layer sulfide films, Mn reduces the acceptor defect level of the absorber. |
author2 |
School of Materials Science and Engineering |
author_facet |
School of Materials Science and Engineering Lie, Stener Li, Wenjie Leow, Shin Woei Bishop, Douglas M. Gunawan, Oki Wong, Lydia Helena |
format |
Article |
author |
Lie, Stener Li, Wenjie Leow, Shin Woei Bishop, Douglas M. Gunawan, Oki Wong, Lydia Helena |
author_sort |
Lie, Stener |
title |
Comparing the effect of Mn substitution in sulfide and sulfoselenide‐based kesterite solar cells |
title_short |
Comparing the effect of Mn substitution in sulfide and sulfoselenide‐based kesterite solar cells |
title_full |
Comparing the effect of Mn substitution in sulfide and sulfoselenide‐based kesterite solar cells |
title_fullStr |
Comparing the effect of Mn substitution in sulfide and sulfoselenide‐based kesterite solar cells |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparing the effect of Mn substitution in sulfide and sulfoselenide‐based kesterite solar cells |
title_sort |
comparing the effect of mn substitution in sulfide and sulfoselenide‐based kesterite solar cells |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/145743 |
_version_ |
1773551217510711296 |