Comparing the effect of Mn substitution in sulfide and sulfoselenide‐based kesterite solar cells

Cation substitution is one of the effective ways to improve Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 (CZTSSe) photovoltaic performance. However, the commonly reported substitutes, Ag and Cd, are not ideal as they detract from the earth‐abundant and nontoxic motivation of CZTSSe. Herein, the role of Mn substitution in sulfide...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lie, Stener, Li, Wenjie, Leow, Shin Woei, Bishop, Douglas M., Gunawan, Oki, Wong, Lydia Helena
Other Authors: School of Materials Science and Engineering
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/145743
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-145743
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1457432023-07-14T16:02:07Z Comparing the effect of Mn substitution in sulfide and sulfoselenide‐based kesterite solar cells Lie, Stener Li, Wenjie Leow, Shin Woei Bishop, Douglas M. Gunawan, Oki Wong, Lydia Helena School of Materials Science and Engineering Engineering::Materials::Energy materials Cation Substitution Thin Films Cation substitution is one of the effective ways to improve Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 (CZTSSe) photovoltaic performance. However, the commonly reported substitutes, Ag and Cd, are not ideal as they detract from the earth‐abundant and nontoxic motivation of CZTSSe. Herein, the role of Mn substitution in sulfide and sulfoselenide films are compared in terms of optoelectronic properties and device performance. CZT(S,Se) + CMZT(S,Se) double‐layered structures are fabricated by a sol–gel spin‐coating method with variations in the CMZT(S,Se) layer thickness. It is found that a smaller amount of Mn is required to achieve the highest photovoltaic performance in sulfoselenide films in comparison with sulfide‐based films. All device parameters (particularly Voc and fill factor) of the sulfoselenide films are improved as compared with the sulfide system. Using a combination of capacitance–voltage, drive‐level capacitance profiling, and photoluminescence (PL), it is found that the sulfoselenide film has a smaller interface defect density and higher hole mobility and PL intensity, which suggest much more effective charge separation and transport. In contrast, in double‐layer sulfide films, Mn reduces the acceptor defect level of the absorber. Ministry of Education (MOE) National Research Foundation (NRF) Accepted version This research is partially supported by grants from the National Research Foundation, Prime Minister’s Office, Singapore under its Campus of Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE) programme and Ministry of Education (MOE) Tier 2 Project (MOE2016-T2-1-030). 2021-01-06T09:00:45Z 2021-01-06T09:00:45Z 2020 Journal Article Lie, S., Li, W., Leow, S. W., Bishop, D. M., Gunawan, O., & Wong, L. H. (2020). Comparing the effect of Mn substitution in sulfide and sulfoselenide‐based kesterite solar cells. Solar RRL, 4(4), 1900521-. doi:10.1002/solr.201900521 2367-198X https://hdl.handle.net/10356/145743 10.1002/solr.201900521 4 4 1900521 en Solar RRL 10.21979/N9/23P0WU This is the accepted version of the following article: Lie, S., Li, W., Leow, S. W., Bishop, D. M., Gunawan, O., & Wong, L. H. (2020). Comparing the effect of Mn substitution in sulfide and sulfoselenide‐based kesterite solar cells. Solar RRL, 4(4), 1900521-. doi:10.1002/solr.201900521, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/solr.201900521. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with the Wiley Self-Archiving Policy [https://authorservices.wiley.com/authorresources/Journal-Authors/licensing/self-archiving.html]. application/pdf application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Engineering::Materials::Energy materials
Cation Substitution
Thin Films
spellingShingle Engineering::Materials::Energy materials
Cation Substitution
Thin Films
Lie, Stener
Li, Wenjie
Leow, Shin Woei
Bishop, Douglas M.
Gunawan, Oki
Wong, Lydia Helena
Comparing the effect of Mn substitution in sulfide and sulfoselenide‐based kesterite solar cells
description Cation substitution is one of the effective ways to improve Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 (CZTSSe) photovoltaic performance. However, the commonly reported substitutes, Ag and Cd, are not ideal as they detract from the earth‐abundant and nontoxic motivation of CZTSSe. Herein, the role of Mn substitution in sulfide and sulfoselenide films are compared in terms of optoelectronic properties and device performance. CZT(S,Se) + CMZT(S,Se) double‐layered structures are fabricated by a sol–gel spin‐coating method with variations in the CMZT(S,Se) layer thickness. It is found that a smaller amount of Mn is required to achieve the highest photovoltaic performance in sulfoselenide films in comparison with sulfide‐based films. All device parameters (particularly Voc and fill factor) of the sulfoselenide films are improved as compared with the sulfide system. Using a combination of capacitance–voltage, drive‐level capacitance profiling, and photoluminescence (PL), it is found that the sulfoselenide film has a smaller interface defect density and higher hole mobility and PL intensity, which suggest much more effective charge separation and transport. In contrast, in double‐layer sulfide films, Mn reduces the acceptor defect level of the absorber.
author2 School of Materials Science and Engineering
author_facet School of Materials Science and Engineering
Lie, Stener
Li, Wenjie
Leow, Shin Woei
Bishop, Douglas M.
Gunawan, Oki
Wong, Lydia Helena
format Article
author Lie, Stener
Li, Wenjie
Leow, Shin Woei
Bishop, Douglas M.
Gunawan, Oki
Wong, Lydia Helena
author_sort Lie, Stener
title Comparing the effect of Mn substitution in sulfide and sulfoselenide‐based kesterite solar cells
title_short Comparing the effect of Mn substitution in sulfide and sulfoselenide‐based kesterite solar cells
title_full Comparing the effect of Mn substitution in sulfide and sulfoselenide‐based kesterite solar cells
title_fullStr Comparing the effect of Mn substitution in sulfide and sulfoselenide‐based kesterite solar cells
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the effect of Mn substitution in sulfide and sulfoselenide‐based kesterite solar cells
title_sort comparing the effect of mn substitution in sulfide and sulfoselenide‐based kesterite solar cells
publishDate 2021
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/145743
_version_ 1773551217510711296