Review of Evans (2014) : the language myth: why language is not an instinct

This book takes on the question of whether a child’s language acquisition depends on an innate informationally-encapsulated language module in the brain, essentially hard-wired grammar, or depends on general cognitive mechanisms. The former view was presented to a lay audience by Stephen Pinker in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: LaPolla, Randy J.
Other Authors: School of Humanities
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/145761
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-145761
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1457612021-01-07T05:00:16Z Review of Evans (2014) : the language myth: why language is not an instinct LaPolla, Randy J. School of Humanities Humanities::Linguistics Vyvyan Evans Linguistics This book takes on the question of whether a child’s language acquisition depends on an innate informationally-encapsulated language module in the brain, essentially hard-wired grammar, or depends on general cognitive mechanisms. The former view was presented to a lay audience by Stephen Pinker in his 1994 book, The Language Instinct, and other publications. E takes on the task of presenting the latter view to a lay audience, primarily by presenting empirical arguments for why the former view is wrong. The title is of course a reaction to Pinker’s, though I would have preferred The Language Instinct Myth or The Myth of the Language Instinct, as the myth is not language itself, but that language is an instinct, and there is already Harris 1981 with the same title, which unfortunately was not cited in E’s book. 2021-01-07T05:00:16Z 2021-01-07T05:00:16Z 2016 Journal Article LaPolla, R. J. (2016). Review of Evans (2014) : the language myth : why language is not an instinct. Studies in Language, 40(1), 235-252. doi:10.1075/sl.40.1.09lap 0378-4177 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/145761 10.1075/sl.40.1.09lap 1 40 235 252 en Studies in Language © 2016 John Benjamins Publishing Company. All rights reserved.
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Humanities::Linguistics
Vyvyan Evans
Linguistics
spellingShingle Humanities::Linguistics
Vyvyan Evans
Linguistics
LaPolla, Randy J.
Review of Evans (2014) : the language myth: why language is not an instinct
description This book takes on the question of whether a child’s language acquisition depends on an innate informationally-encapsulated language module in the brain, essentially hard-wired grammar, or depends on general cognitive mechanisms. The former view was presented to a lay audience by Stephen Pinker in his 1994 book, The Language Instinct, and other publications. E takes on the task of presenting the latter view to a lay audience, primarily by presenting empirical arguments for why the former view is wrong. The title is of course a reaction to Pinker’s, though I would have preferred The Language Instinct Myth or The Myth of the Language Instinct, as the myth is not language itself, but that language is an instinct, and there is already Harris 1981 with the same title, which unfortunately was not cited in E’s book.
author2 School of Humanities
author_facet School of Humanities
LaPolla, Randy J.
format Article
author LaPolla, Randy J.
author_sort LaPolla, Randy J.
title Review of Evans (2014) : the language myth: why language is not an instinct
title_short Review of Evans (2014) : the language myth: why language is not an instinct
title_full Review of Evans (2014) : the language myth: why language is not an instinct
title_fullStr Review of Evans (2014) : the language myth: why language is not an instinct
title_full_unstemmed Review of Evans (2014) : the language myth: why language is not an instinct
title_sort review of evans (2014) : the language myth: why language is not an instinct
publishDate 2021
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/145761
_version_ 1688665469586767872