Arguments for seeing theme- rheme and topic-comment as separate functional structures
In this chapter I would like to talk about aspects of the SFL approach to communication that I think are important to all linguists but have been overlooked or obscured in some other approaches. These include recognition of the importance of Theme-Rheme; the separation of Theme-Rheme and ‘given’-‘ne...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Book Chapter |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Routledge
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/145791 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
| Language: | English |
| Summary: | In this chapter I would like to talk about aspects of the SFL approach to communication that I think are important to all linguists but have been overlooked or obscured in some other approaches. These include recognition of the importance of Theme-Rheme; the separation of Theme-Rheme and ‘given’-‘new’; the separation of interpersonal and ideational meaning; the importance of prosody in understanding grammar; the usefulness of the Token/Value distinction; and explanation in description. I will also point out aspects of Prof. Halliday’s approach that have influenced other approaches, and aspects that relate to concepts in other approaches, such as the importance of Theme to what is called ‘projection’ in Interactional Linguistics, and on the basis of this suggest that Theme-Rheme be seen as a separate functional structure from Topic-Comment. I will also discuss the role of construction in meaning creation. |
|---|