Support for the habitat amount hypothesis from a global synthesis of species density studies

Decades of research suggest that species richness depends on spatial characteristics of habitat patches, especially their size and isolation. In contrast, the habitat amount hypothesis predicts that (1) species richness in plots of fixed size (species density) is more strongly and positively related...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Watling, James I., Arroyo-Rodríguez, Victor, Pfeifer, Marion, Baeten, Lander, Banks-Leite, Cristina, Cisneros, Laura M., Fang, Rebecca, Hamel-Leigue, A. Caroli, Lachat, Thibault, Leal, Inara R., Lens, Luc, Possingham, Hugh P., Raheem, Dinarzarde C., Ribeiro, Danilo B., Slade, Eleanor M., Urbina-Cardona, J. Nicolas, Wood, Eric M., Fahrig, Lenore
Other Authors: Asian School of the Environment
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/145970
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-145970
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1459702021-01-19T01:42:50Z Support for the habitat amount hypothesis from a global synthesis of species density studies Watling, James I. Arroyo-Rodríguez, Victor Pfeifer, Marion Baeten, Lander Banks-Leite, Cristina Cisneros, Laura M. Fang, Rebecca Hamel-Leigue, A. Caroli Lachat, Thibault Leal, Inara R. Lens, Luc Possingham, Hugh P. Raheem, Dinarzarde C. Ribeiro, Danilo B. Slade, Eleanor M. Urbina-Cardona, J. Nicolas Wood, Eric M. Fahrig, Lenore Asian School of the Environment Science::Biological sciences::Ecology Forest Loss Patch Size Decades of research suggest that species richness depends on spatial characteristics of habitat patches, especially their size and isolation. In contrast, the habitat amount hypothesis predicts that (1) species richness in plots of fixed size (species density) is more strongly and positively related to the amount of habitat around the plot than to patch size or isolation; (2) habitat amount better predicts species density than patch size and isolation combined, (3) there is no effect of habitat fragmentation per se on species density and (4) patch size and isolation effects do not become stronger with declining habitat amount. Data on eight taxonomic groups from 35 studies around the world support these predictions. Conserving species density requires minimising habitat loss, irrespective of the configuration of the patches in which that habitat is contained. 2021-01-19T01:42:49Z 2021-01-19T01:42:49Z 2020 Journal Article Watling, J. I., Arroyo-Rodríguez, V., Pfeifer, M., Baeten, L., Banks-Leite, C., Cisneros, L. M., ... Fahrig, L. (2020). Ecology Letters, 23(4), 674-681. doi:10.1111/ele.13471 1461-023X 0000-0003-4445-4808 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/145970 10.1111/ele.13471 32043741 2-s2.0-85079460166 4 23 674 681 en Ecology Letters © 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. All rights reserved.
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Science::Biological sciences::Ecology
Forest Loss
Patch Size
spellingShingle Science::Biological sciences::Ecology
Forest Loss
Patch Size
Watling, James I.
Arroyo-Rodríguez, Victor
Pfeifer, Marion
Baeten, Lander
Banks-Leite, Cristina
Cisneros, Laura M.
Fang, Rebecca
Hamel-Leigue, A. Caroli
Lachat, Thibault
Leal, Inara R.
Lens, Luc
Possingham, Hugh P.
Raheem, Dinarzarde C.
Ribeiro, Danilo B.
Slade, Eleanor M.
Urbina-Cardona, J. Nicolas
Wood, Eric M.
Fahrig, Lenore
Support for the habitat amount hypothesis from a global synthesis of species density studies
description Decades of research suggest that species richness depends on spatial characteristics of habitat patches, especially their size and isolation. In contrast, the habitat amount hypothesis predicts that (1) species richness in plots of fixed size (species density) is more strongly and positively related to the amount of habitat around the plot than to patch size or isolation; (2) habitat amount better predicts species density than patch size and isolation combined, (3) there is no effect of habitat fragmentation per se on species density and (4) patch size and isolation effects do not become stronger with declining habitat amount. Data on eight taxonomic groups from 35 studies around the world support these predictions. Conserving species density requires minimising habitat loss, irrespective of the configuration of the patches in which that habitat is contained.
author2 Asian School of the Environment
author_facet Asian School of the Environment
Watling, James I.
Arroyo-Rodríguez, Victor
Pfeifer, Marion
Baeten, Lander
Banks-Leite, Cristina
Cisneros, Laura M.
Fang, Rebecca
Hamel-Leigue, A. Caroli
Lachat, Thibault
Leal, Inara R.
Lens, Luc
Possingham, Hugh P.
Raheem, Dinarzarde C.
Ribeiro, Danilo B.
Slade, Eleanor M.
Urbina-Cardona, J. Nicolas
Wood, Eric M.
Fahrig, Lenore
format Article
author Watling, James I.
Arroyo-Rodríguez, Victor
Pfeifer, Marion
Baeten, Lander
Banks-Leite, Cristina
Cisneros, Laura M.
Fang, Rebecca
Hamel-Leigue, A. Caroli
Lachat, Thibault
Leal, Inara R.
Lens, Luc
Possingham, Hugh P.
Raheem, Dinarzarde C.
Ribeiro, Danilo B.
Slade, Eleanor M.
Urbina-Cardona, J. Nicolas
Wood, Eric M.
Fahrig, Lenore
author_sort Watling, James I.
title Support for the habitat amount hypothesis from a global synthesis of species density studies
title_short Support for the habitat amount hypothesis from a global synthesis of species density studies
title_full Support for the habitat amount hypothesis from a global synthesis of species density studies
title_fullStr Support for the habitat amount hypothesis from a global synthesis of species density studies
title_full_unstemmed Support for the habitat amount hypothesis from a global synthesis of species density studies
title_sort support for the habitat amount hypothesis from a global synthesis of species density studies
publishDate 2021
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/145970
_version_ 1690658428255469568