Race of interviewer effects in telephone surveys preceding the 2008 U.S. presidential election
Race of interviewer effects are presumed to occur in surveys because respondents answer questions differently depending on interviewer race. This article explored an alternative explanation: differential respondent recruitment. Data from telephone interviews conducted during the 2008 U.S. Presidenti...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/146321 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-146321 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1463212023-03-05T15:58:11Z Race of interviewer effects in telephone surveys preceding the 2008 U.S. presidential election Kim, Nuri Krosnick, Jon A. Lelkes, Yphtach Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information Social sciences::Communication Race of Interviewer 2008 Presidential Election Race of interviewer effects are presumed to occur in surveys because respondents answer questions differently depending on interviewer race. This article explored an alternative explanation: differential respondent recruitment. Data from telephone interviews conducted during the 2008 U.S. Presidential election campaign by major survey organizations (ABC News/Washington Post, CBS News/New York Times, and Gallup) indicate that African-American interviewers were more likely to elicit statements of the intent to vote for Barack Obama than White interviewers. But this effect occurred because African-American interviewers were more likely than White interviewers to elicit survey participation by African-American respondents, and/or White interviewers were more likely to elicit participation by White respondents. Thus, differences between interviewers in terms of responses obtained are not necessarily because of respondent lying. Accepted version 2021-02-09T06:09:44Z 2021-02-09T06:09:44Z 2018 Journal Article Kim, N., Krosnick, J. A., & Lelkes, Y. (2019). Race of interviewer effects in telephone surveys preceding the 2008 U.S. presidential election. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 31(2), 220-242. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edy005 0954-2892 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/146321 10.1093/ijpor/edy005 2-s2.0-85072381446 2 31 220 242 en International Journal of Public Opinion Research © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The World Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Social sciences::Communication Race of Interviewer 2008 Presidential Election |
spellingShingle |
Social sciences::Communication Race of Interviewer 2008 Presidential Election Kim, Nuri Krosnick, Jon A. Lelkes, Yphtach Race of interviewer effects in telephone surveys preceding the 2008 U.S. presidential election |
description |
Race of interviewer effects are presumed to occur in surveys because respondents answer questions differently depending on interviewer race. This article explored an alternative explanation: differential respondent recruitment. Data from telephone interviews conducted during the 2008 U.S. Presidential election campaign by major survey organizations (ABC News/Washington Post, CBS News/New York Times, and Gallup) indicate that African-American interviewers were more likely to elicit statements of the intent to vote for Barack Obama than White interviewers. But this effect occurred because African-American interviewers were more likely than White interviewers to elicit survey participation by African-American respondents, and/or White interviewers were more likely to elicit participation by White respondents. Thus, differences between interviewers in terms of responses obtained are not necessarily because of respondent lying. |
author2 |
Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information |
author_facet |
Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information Kim, Nuri Krosnick, Jon A. Lelkes, Yphtach |
format |
Article |
author |
Kim, Nuri Krosnick, Jon A. Lelkes, Yphtach |
author_sort |
Kim, Nuri |
title |
Race of interviewer effects in telephone surveys preceding the 2008 U.S. presidential election |
title_short |
Race of interviewer effects in telephone surveys preceding the 2008 U.S. presidential election |
title_full |
Race of interviewer effects in telephone surveys preceding the 2008 U.S. presidential election |
title_fullStr |
Race of interviewer effects in telephone surveys preceding the 2008 U.S. presidential election |
title_full_unstemmed |
Race of interviewer effects in telephone surveys preceding the 2008 U.S. presidential election |
title_sort |
race of interviewer effects in telephone surveys preceding the 2008 u.s. presidential election |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/146321 |
_version_ |
1759855698041110528 |