Complementary and competitive framing of driverless cars : framing effects, attitude volatility, or attitude resistance?
This study answers two research questions regarding framing theory. First, what happens when frames are challenged? Second, how resistant are the opinions that initial frames induce? 1,006 participants completed an online experiment where they were randomly assigned to first view a blog post with ei...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/146768 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-146768 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1467682023-03-05T15:57:39Z Complementary and competitive framing of driverless cars : framing effects, attitude volatility, or attitude resistance? Ho, Shirley S. Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information Social sciences::Communication Driverless Cars Framing This study answers two research questions regarding framing theory. First, what happens when frames are challenged? Second, how resistant are the opinions that initial frames induce? 1,006 participants completed an online experiment where they were randomly assigned to first view a blog post with either complementary or competitive framing on driverless cars. Participants also viewed a blog post that challenged the stance of the first blog post. Results revealed that complementary frames polarized opinions, while competitive frames neutralized framing effects. Competitive frames induced more resistant opinions than complementary frames did. Attitude and support were susceptible to new, antagonistic information. This study concludes that framing effects are ephemeral and easily challenged by different information. Ministry of Education (MOE) Accepted version This study is funded by the Singapore Ministry of Education Tier 1 grant (Grant Award Number: 04MNP000243C440). 2021-03-10T02:23:02Z 2021-03-10T02:23:02Z 2021 Journal Article Ho, S. S. (2021). Complementary and competitive framing of driverless cars : framing effects, attitude volatility, or attitude resistance? International Journal of Public Opinion Research. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edab001 1471-6909 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/146768 10.1093/ijpor/edab001 en 04MNP000243C440 International Journal of Public Opinion Research © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The World Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. This paper was published in International Journal of Public Opinion Research and is made available with permission of The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The World Association for Public Opinion Research. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Social sciences::Communication Driverless Cars Framing |
spellingShingle |
Social sciences::Communication Driverless Cars Framing Ho, Shirley S. Complementary and competitive framing of driverless cars : framing effects, attitude volatility, or attitude resistance? |
description |
This study answers two research questions regarding framing theory. First, what happens when frames are challenged? Second, how resistant are the opinions that initial frames induce? 1,006 participants completed an online experiment where they were randomly assigned to first view a blog post with either complementary or competitive framing on driverless cars. Participants also viewed a blog post that challenged the stance of the first blog post. Results revealed that complementary frames polarized opinions, while competitive frames neutralized framing effects. Competitive frames induced more resistant opinions than complementary frames did. Attitude and support were susceptible to new, antagonistic information. This study concludes that framing effects are ephemeral and easily challenged by different information. |
author2 |
Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information |
author_facet |
Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information Ho, Shirley S. |
format |
Article |
author |
Ho, Shirley S. |
author_sort |
Ho, Shirley S. |
title |
Complementary and competitive framing of driverless cars : framing effects, attitude volatility, or attitude resistance? |
title_short |
Complementary and competitive framing of driverless cars : framing effects, attitude volatility, or attitude resistance? |
title_full |
Complementary and competitive framing of driverless cars : framing effects, attitude volatility, or attitude resistance? |
title_fullStr |
Complementary and competitive framing of driverless cars : framing effects, attitude volatility, or attitude resistance? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Complementary and competitive framing of driverless cars : framing effects, attitude volatility, or attitude resistance? |
title_sort |
complementary and competitive framing of driverless cars : framing effects, attitude volatility, or attitude resistance? |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/146768 |
_version_ |
1759853734942212096 |